Preview

3 Proofs Of The Unjust By Plato

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
3 Proofs Of The Unjust By Plato
In Plato's Republic, the protagonist Socrates provides three proofs that a just life is more satisfying than an unjust life. Of the three proofs, The third is the focus of our attention today. It states that “ when the entire soul follows the philosophophic part, there is no civil war in it, each part of it does its own work exclusively and is just, and in a particular it enjoys its own pleasures, the best and truest pleasures possible for it...but when one of the other parts gains control, it won't be able to secure its own pleasure and will compel the other parts to pursue an alien and untrue pleasure” 586e-587a. I believe that the third proof is meant to distinguish between genuine pleasure and the relief of pain. Let us take a look at the …show more content…
Clearly the just, for their pleasures are made of what is good and ture. Their pleasures are founded in a world of understanding that can not be taken away. The unjust live their lives looking for the next quick buzz, or the next fast profit. Because of this, they are never satisfied with their lives and what they have acquired. The just man can say he has tasted both desires and victory, but had the drive to pursue more. The just man did not quit at being the best, but allowed himself to keep attaining knowledge, and becoming more speriritchly full than those who chase after the unjust and untrue desires. A strange way of looking at it, is if both men were to die tomorrow. The unjust man would say I never had enough. But the just would say “my soul is at peace”. To me, the just man looks like Janusz Korczak. In 1911 he became a director for a jewish orphanage. Korczak had the option to walk away from the kids, several times throughout the course of World War two, but never once abandoned his virtues or his children. When the unjust man would have worked to saved his life, Korczak give comfort to those who looked up to him. You can destroy the physical body, take away the earthly desires, and even kill a man who is just. But in the end, he will only suffer pain of the body, but his soul will have its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On pages 35-37 of Plato’s philosophical dialogue “Apology” (389 BCE), Socrates argues that if he is wise it’s because he, unlike others, knows that he is not wise and he knows that people can not know when they think they know. In the beginning of the dialogue socrates sets up the question on why he is in trouble with the court(for corrupting the youth) and where did his reputation come from. He explains to the court that the oracle pronounced him as being the most wise and that no one else was wiser than him. Being confused on why the Gods would say this, Socrates explains the stories to the court on how he ventured out to search for wiser man to prove the oracle wrong but along the way he realizes that the politicians, poets, and artisans…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republic Study Guide

    • 2098 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thrasymachus: Justice is defined as might makes right. The advantage of the strong. He is saying that it does not pay to be just. Just behavior works to the advantage of other people, not to the person who behaves justly. Thrasymachus assumes here that justice is the unnatural restraint on our natural desire to have more. Justice is a convention imposed on us, and it does not benefit us to adhere to it. The rational thing to do is ignore justice entirely.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and a fellow interlocutor, Callicles of Acharnae, fervently discuss the relationship between pleasure and good. It is in this philosophical debate that Callicles states a good life as one that consists of having as much unrestricted pleasure as possible; therefore, implying that the pleasant and the good are identical. However, Socrates contends otherwise, and attempts to convince Callicles of the error in his ways by proving that good is ultimately not the same as pleasure. Socrates does so by employing two key arguments that render Callicles case unsupported and fallacious.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Repulic, Book V

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    ABSTRACT: This paper discusses the viability of certain aspects (the sex lottery) of Plato 's Republic, book V. It is college level 'A ' paper.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The real question is whether the man has been justly slain. If justly, then your duty is to let the matter alone; but if unjustly, then even if the murderer is under the same roof with you and eats at the same table, proceed against him” (Plato 3). This quote from The Trial and Death of Socrates demonstrates acts in themselves are neither unjust nor just, and the perception by the person deciding whether the act is unjust or just, is the determining factor in the matter. In this case, Euthyphro, the man who said this, originally believes the act of murder is unjust, and believes he should in fact proceed against his father, even though in most perceptions it is considered impious; and although Socrates it is considered impious, Euthyphro’s…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates an ancient Greek philosopher who arguably set a philosophical president for all modern western theories, though he lived in ___________. Today in the 21st century his trial is still studied and debated. Some belief the trial justified and the Athenians were correct in his prosecution. However, large populations argue that the trial was unjust and Athenians used Socrates as a scapegoat for the troubles that the Athena democracy was facing during that time. Three men brought the charges laid against Socrates. Metetus, a wildly religious man, Anytus, a wealthy business owner and Lycon who was largely unknown and likely only there to fill the Athenian political requirements, there brought fourth two charges, impiety and the corruption of the youth. A…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world there are people who are just or unjust; some might even be both. A person who goes out in the day may be just because he wants people to recognize his good behavior, and praise him for it. But that same person may go out at night, and be completely unjust because no one can see him. Therefore, in his mind his actions don’t matter. In Plato’s The Republic, the view of justice is illustrated by the story of Gyges’ ring, and that view is that if people could turn invisible almost all of them would be unjust.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A: A just individual must respect other individuals in the society to better the society as a whole.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus, a famous Sophist philosopher, shared his theory that injustice has greater advantages than justice. He says that injustice is “superior to justice in strength and freedom and autocratic power.” This is because he believes that a just man always has the worst of it. Thrasymachus defines “just” as those who serve the interest of the stronger at the cost of the subject who obeys, and “injustice” as asserting authority over those innocents so that they may please their master, instead of having their own happiness or gaining an advantage. His bases his idea that the unjust are more successful than the just because the more honest of two competitors never comes off with the larger share and always sacrifices more than they need to. “If there is money to be distributed, the dishonest man will get it all.”He states that they miss out on so many advantageous opportunities that only the unjust man could claim. The unjust man can get the better of other people on a interest not to be just.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Justice is served” is the cliché line heard in courtrooms throughout the world of fantasy. What justice is proves to be more difficult to define. Many definitions state it as an action that is the result or punishment for a negative action. The trouble lies in what defines what is just, the law, society or morality. Plato’s use of Socrates in “Crito” argues that justice is defined as the laws of a city or state as well as what a person’s own perception of justice is. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Molière’s play Tartuffe argues that justice is both a moral concept as well as a way of reprimanding wrongdoing by a higher political power. Antigone is Sophocles’ description of justice which lies in the social repercussions for those who break the laws…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's Essay

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the diagram, Plato gives a discussion of what he thinks is justice and he talks about a Just person. This is a lecture where he compares these theories in political views and psychological views. He wrote a book in the republic where he talks about harmony by applying to a pure person who is justice and with logical reason. The ideas and arguments of Plato is on the social settings of an ideal republic. Since Socrates was his mentor, he uses his discussions to help support his discussion. The idea of the Republic is to draw an analogy between the operation of society as a whole and the life of any individual human being. He draws this into three separate parts in which will be discussed in depth.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics