Preview

3 Landmark Supreme Court Cases- Research Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
3 Landmark Supreme Court Cases- Research Essay
Abraham Lincoln once said, “Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties” (Shmoop.com). On September 17th, 1787 the signing of Constitution of the United States of America took place. The members of the Constitutional Convention met to create a strong, centralized government after the dissatisfaction of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution created a government made by the people, for the people, which includes minors. Every American citizen has undeniable rights that are provided in the Constitution and that should also protect minors while they are at school and at home, where they should be able to express themselves without punishment as well.

Ingraham v. Wright is a Supreme Court case that deals with corporal punishment at school. James Ingraham, a 14 year old boy, was taken to his principal’s office for “rowdy” behavior. As a punishment for misbehaving, the principal decided to give him five swats with a paddle, although he denied doing anything wrong and refused to be punished, so he was repeatedly swatted twenty times (Jacobs, 8). According to the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University, paddling violates the Eighth Amendment, which states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Although, even if paddling is acceptable, students have the right to be heard under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (Cornell University, LII). The majority ruling of court was not in James’ favor. Justice Powell gave the opinion of the court stating that “Reasonable physical discipline doesn’t violate the constitution.” As well as, “The Eighth Amendment was designed to protect convicted criminals from excessive punishment at the hands of the government- not school children who misbehave” (Wilson). As stated by the Bill of Rights Institute, in 1791 James Wilson lectured on justice and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella, n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar, a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at the facility and the determination, customary at that time, was made to have Poddar involuntarily committed. Dr. Moore notified the campus police and requested that Poddar be picked up, warning that Poddar can appear quite rational at times. Campus…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In her open statement on the sexual harassment hearings, Anita Hill recounts the details of how Judge Clarence Thomas took advantage of working relationship between them and conducted inappropriate sexually offensive behaviors toward her. Although Hill does not feel comfortable to reveal her vulnerability, she keeps a very formal and constraining tone while she illustrates in details of the process in which Judge Thomas intentionally ignored her refusal on his innumerable invitations to social outings. Admitting to having poor judgement, Hill is still trying to portray a despicable and heinous character of Judge Clarence, and proves to the court that his illegitimate action deserves punishment.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Landmark case law

    • 1824 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S. 261 (1990) was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990. In a 5-4 court decision, the court found in favor of the Missouri Dept. of Health. The court affirmed the ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri. However, it upheld the legal standard that competent persons are able to exercise the right to refuse medical treatment under the Due Process Clause and its implied right to privacy. Because there was no “clear and convincing evidence” of what Nancy Cruzan wanted, the court upheld the state’s policy.…

    • 1824 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Louisiana placed a law giving separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Plessy- 7/8 Caucasian, sat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train, and refused to move to the car for blacks and was then arrested. The Court had to decide whether the Louisiana law was unconstitutional under the 14th amendment. The Court ruled that the state law was within its constitutional boundaries. The majority of this case supported the state-imposed racial segregation. The Court based their final decision on the separate but equal doctrine and agreed that the state had separate facilities for blacks and whites, which were equal. Brown stated that the 14th amendment was imposed to provide complete equality of races before the law. In…

    • 3484 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the court case of Ingraham vs. Wright, James Ingraham an 8th grade student sued his school for cruel and unusual punishment when he got severely beaten for failing to promptly leave the stage of his school auditorium when told by his teacher. He was sent to the schools principle Willie J. Wright and Ingraham told him he was not guilty of the accusation's against him. Wright Obviously didn’t care and followed to bend James over to hit him with the a paddle but struggled. Wright called in the assistant principle and his personal assistant to help hold his arms and legs down and continued to beat James Ingraham. In the text it said "The paddling was so server that he suffered a hematoma requiring medical attention and keeping him out of school for several days." After the 20+ licks Wright gave to Ingraham he made a complaint in 1971 along with the help of another student named Roosevelt Andrews who had also been beaten badly by Wright. They claimed that the school violated the Eight Amendment that…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In lecture we discovered that the precedent adopted in the State vs. Pendergrass case was Stare Decisis, which stands for “stand by what has been decided”. Stare Decisis, in further detail, means when determining the outcome of a court decision, judges look at similar cases dealt with in the past to help determine the outcome of the case presented. Another precedent that could be appropriate for this case is the maintenance of hierarchical relationships. Thinking that children need discipline is the only way this could be made precedent in this court decision. “one of the most sacred duties of the parents, is to train up and qualify their children,” which may deem whipping necessary. The sole reason to whip a child is in best interest for him/her…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federal district courts handle only a certain type of case in their court. These court cases has to have subject matter jurisdiction, and that’s when the issue at hand arises under the Federal law, or if either of the parties share a state of citizenship and the amount involved in the case exceeds 75,000.…

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May, 31st, 2011, Justice Antonin Sacalia delivered the opinion of The US Supreme Court regarding Ashcroft, John D. V. Al-Kidd, Abdullah case. Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Al-Kidd Abdullah was arrested by Federal agents as a material-witness, after obtaining a warrant from a federal judge. Under the material-statute, in the US, a witness qualified as determinant to the issue of a criminal proceeding could be arrested in order to secure his testimony. Thus, Abdullah Al-Kidd will be arrested as a determinant witness in the trial of another individual (Sami Omar Al-Hussayen) suspected of terrorism on the US territory. Although, Abdullah Al-Kidd will never appear before a court as a suspect, neither as a witness, he will be kept in jail for 13 months. After his release, Abdullah Al-Kidd will file a lawsuit against John D. Ashcroft, the US United States…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, on behalf of Country Wide, seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s property.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roe v. Wade research paper

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the controversial case, Roe v. Wade, a pregnant woman who was given the name Jane Roe to hide her identity attempted to get an abortion but they were illegal in Texas so she sued the state for invasion of privacy. Roe's real name is Norma McCorvey; she was an ex-carnival worker who was raped and became pregnant. In 1969, when she moved back to her home state, she was denied and abortion on grounds that her health was not threatened. She started to look for other options, such as an abortion clinic out of the country, but those were too risky. She had given up searching for a safe, clinical abortion when two lawyers contacted her about her story. These lawyers were Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. Weddington had herself been through the search for an abortion clinic that was decent. She was lucky; she was able to live in Mexico for several weeks and could pay the high price for a safe abortion. Weddington did not want others to go through the insecurity of an illegal abortion like she had. Coffee was a practiced lawyer who was a strong supporter of abortions. John and Mary Doe, a couple that had offered their services in a previous abortion case, approached Coffee and Weddington who quickly included them in the case. Coffee and Wellington made a perfect couple to head up the fight against the District Attorney of Texas, Henry Wade. Wade had been the District Attorney for twenty years and on March 6, 1970 he received the paper that stated Jane Roe and John and Mary Doe were suing him. He had shown many times before his firm beliefs in preserving the Texas abortion laws. Henry Wade chose one of his most capable lawyers, John Tolle, to defend him in this suit.…

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarence Thomas is the second colored male justice to serve on the U.S Supreme Court. I wanted to write about Clarence Thomas because i was fascinated how he overcame racial barriers, why he rarely asked questions in court, also his opinion as a U.S Supreme Court justice.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is the most important election in the history of the United States. Even more important than the elections of 1800, 1860, and 1932. The future of the United States hangs in balance, and this is largely because of the current situation of the Supreme Court. The balance of the Supreme Court is currently three conservative justices and four liberal justices, along with one justice who often votes conservative.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Paper

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I think that the Supreme Court can be considered undemocratic because once they are elected, they are there for good unless Congress votes 2/3 and the President approves then they can be removed from their power. I think they are elected for life because it would not be easy for Congress, the current President, and even the American people to sway their decisions. The Supreme Court is designed to rule only on the constitutionality of both federal and state laws, which is known as judicial review. They are the only federal position that has a great amount power that is appointed by the President is the Supreme Court.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Ingraham, a student from Drew Junior High School in Dade County, Florida, was paddled by his principal twenty times on 6th October,1970 just because he was a few seconds late in coming down from the stage of the auditorium. Ingraham was punished so violently by the principal of the school that later he was admitted to hospital, and had to be away from the school for two weeks (Sterett). Even though this incident happened forty years back, the practice of corporal punishment is still taking place in some parts of the world, and the debate of whether corporal punishment should be legal or not is still a very heated topic. However, corporal punishment should be stopped completely and made illegal for the betterment of the students.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays