3.10 Ethics Case Study
3.10 Research ethics
As the proponents conduct the study, the survey and interview methods were made in a right and brief way to gathered data that will be used in the design and development of the proposed system. Ethical principles were observed with the hope that this would promote trust between the researches and the respondents.
3.11 Evaluation Procedure
This table shows the range and their verbal interpretation of the computed weighted mean of the study.
Table 1: Five Point Scale
RATING RANGE VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
5 4.51 - 5.00 Excellent
4 3.51 - 4.50 Good
3 2.51 - 3.50 Fair
2 1.51 - 2.50 Poor
1 1.00 - 1.50 Needs Improvement
The quality of the system was evaluated based on the software quality proposed by ISO 9126. The software quality …show more content…
Efficiency and Effectiveness, describe its comparison of what can be achieved with the same consumption of resources which include time, effort, or cost for the intended purpose.
Maintainability refers to its ability to identify and fix the bugs within a software component.
Portability refers to how well the software can adopt changes.
3.12 Statistical Treatment of Data
Since the study covers a wide range of target beneficiaries in the time of implementation, the proponents decided to select a specific area where they would conduct its survey to analyze the rate of necessity of the proposed system as well as the evaluation.
After gathering all the data, the proponents tabulated and analyze the data required in the study with the help of mathematical procedures and formulas.
The data gathered was determined by using a SLOVIN’s Formula, Percentage and Weighted Mean.
SLOVIN’S FORMULA, This was the formula used in computing for the sample size of the …show more content…
Statistic about the prospective users will be known by presenting the data that the proponents have gathered with the use of the survey results and different methods used in gathering data like evaluation. The proponents will have to analysed and interpret these gathered data of the respondents. The findings of the study determine if is capable enough to continue.
Table 2: Familiarity in Computer Networking
Factors No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 30 60%
No 20 40%
TOTAL 50 100%
As shown in Table 2, 60 % of students are familiar with computer networking and 40% of them are not.
Table 3: The use of Reviewing Question & Answer method in reviewing
Factors No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 48 96%
No 2 4%
TOTAL 50 100%
As shown in Table 3, 96% of students are using the question-and-answer method in reviewing and 4% does not. Most students are convenient in using question-and-answer method in reviewing their lessons.
Table 4: Having a hard time in memorizing important networking Terminologies
Factors No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 33 66%
No 17 34%
TOTAL 50 100%
As shown in Table 4, 66 % of students are having a hard time in memorizing important networking terminologies and configurations while 34% is
As the proponents conduct the study, the survey and interview methods were made in a right and brief way to gathered data that will be used in the design and development of the proposed system. Ethical principles were observed with the hope that this would promote trust between the researches and the respondents.
3.11 Evaluation Procedure
This table shows the range and their verbal interpretation of the computed weighted mean of the study.
Table 1: Five Point Scale
RATING RANGE VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
5 4.51 - 5.00 Excellent
4 3.51 - 4.50 Good
3 2.51 - 3.50 Fair
2 1.51 - 2.50 Poor
1 1.00 - 1.50 Needs Improvement
The quality of the system was evaluated based on the software quality proposed by ISO 9126. The software quality …show more content…
Efficiency and Effectiveness, describe its comparison of what can be achieved with the same consumption of resources which include time, effort, or cost for the intended purpose.
Maintainability refers to its ability to identify and fix the bugs within a software component.
Portability refers to how well the software can adopt changes.
3.12 Statistical Treatment of Data
Since the study covers a wide range of target beneficiaries in the time of implementation, the proponents decided to select a specific area where they would conduct its survey to analyze the rate of necessity of the proposed system as well as the evaluation.
After gathering all the data, the proponents tabulated and analyze the data required in the study with the help of mathematical procedures and formulas.
The data gathered was determined by using a SLOVIN’s Formula, Percentage and Weighted Mean.
SLOVIN’S FORMULA, This was the formula used in computing for the sample size of the …show more content…
Statistic about the prospective users will be known by presenting the data that the proponents have gathered with the use of the survey results and different methods used in gathering data like evaluation. The proponents will have to analysed and interpret these gathered data of the respondents. The findings of the study determine if is capable enough to continue.
Table 2: Familiarity in Computer Networking
Factors No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 30 60%
No 20 40%
TOTAL 50 100%
As shown in Table 2, 60 % of students are familiar with computer networking and 40% of them are not.
Table 3: The use of Reviewing Question & Answer method in reviewing
Factors No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 48 96%
No 2 4%
TOTAL 50 100%
As shown in Table 3, 96% of students are using the question-and-answer method in reviewing and 4% does not. Most students are convenient in using question-and-answer method in reviewing their lessons.
Table 4: Having a hard time in memorizing important networking Terminologies
Factors No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 33 66%
No 17 34%
TOTAL 50 100%
As shown in Table 4, 66 % of students are having a hard time in memorizing important networking terminologies and configurations while 34% is