INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
International Journal of Project Management 23 (2005) 141–149 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman
What do construction project planners do?
Graham M. Winch
, John Kelsey
Centre for Research in the Management of Projects, University of Manchester, P.O. Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, UK Centre for Research in the Management of Projects, School of Construction and Project Management, The Bartlett University College London, UK Received 8 July 2003; received in revised form 30 January 2004; accepted 15 June 2004
Abstract Construction project planning is receiving growing attention as the limitations of formal deterministic planning are becoming more widely recognised. In particular, the last planner and critical chain approaches are diﬀusing rapidly. However, little of this debate has been informed by empirical examination of what construction project planners actually do. The research reported here draws on three diﬀerent research projects. One on the overall context of construction project planning, and two focused on requirements capture for the virtual construction site system. For the later project, 18 construction planners were interviewed on their daily practice. The results show that construction planning for principal contractors is more about negotiation with other interested parties and rapid decision-making based on heuristics than detailed analysis. Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. All rights reserved. Keywords: Construction project planning: Critical path analysis: Tendering
1. Introduction There has been considerable debate over the last decade or so on the eﬀectiveness of construction project planning. However, there is remarkably little research into what construction project planners actually do. The research reported here was undertaken as part of the requirements capture process for the development of the VIRCON system (VCS) as a strategic decision support tool for construction project planners. This larger research project is reported elsewhere . This paper will explore the evidence on the role and practice of project planners that underpinned the development of the VCS. In so doing, it will address what Laufer and his colleagues  identify as the operation/systems analysis level of construction scheduling. The paper will ﬁrst review some of the recent debates on construction project planning. It will then report the results from our inter*
views with 18 construction planners from ﬁve leading UK ﬁrms before some conclusions are drawn.
2. Recent debates in construction project planning In an early paper, Laufer and Tucker  provide a critique of (US) construction planning. They argue that: The planning and evaluation of planning processes are non-existent. There is over-emphasis on critical path methods. Planners lack construction experience. Planners have poor information gathering methods. Planning is control-oriented instead of actionoriented. Plans are poorly presented with overly-complex information. In a subsequent paper, Laufer and his colleagues  look at the deﬁnition and allocation of planning work.
Corresponding author. E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org (G.M. Winch).
0263-7863/$30.00 Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.002
G.M. Winch, J. Kelsey / International Journal of Project Management 23 (2005) 141–149
They found that there was no clear system used, and planning was done in a multiplicity of ways. Laufer and Tucker  discuss the problem of who should do construction planning and when they should do it. The specialist planner has the time to do the work but incomplete practical knowledge. The line manager has the practical knowledge but does not have the quality time to carry out the task. The specialist planner has better strategic decision-making skills than the short-term decision-making focus of the line manager. Line...
References:  North S, Winch GM, Dawood N, Heesom D, Kelsey J, Sriprasert S, Technical evaluation: VIRCON Task 12 report UMIST, a VIRCON project report, 2003.  Laufer A, Howell GA, Rosenfeld Y. Three modes of short-term construction planning. Constr Manage Econ 1992;10:249–62.  Laufer A, Tucker RL. Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process. Constr Manage Econ 1987;5:243–66.  Laufer A, Tucker RL, Shapira A, Shenhar AJ. The multiplicity concept in construction project planning. Constr Manage Econ 1994;12:53–65.  Laufer A, Tucker RL. Competence and timing dilemma in construction planning. Constr Manage Econ 1988;6:339–55.  Laufer A. A micro view of the project planning process. Constr Manage Econ 1992;10:31–43.  Turner JR. The handbook of project-based management. 2nd ed.. London: McGraw-Hill; 1999.  Winch GM. Managing construction projects: an information processing approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2002.  Goldratt EM. Critical chain great. Barrington: The North River Press; 1997.  Barber P, Tomkins C, Graves A. Decentralised site management – a case study International. J Proj Manage 1999;17:113–20.  Ballard G, Howell G. Shielding production: essential step in production control. J Constr Eng Manage 1998;124:11–7.  Faniran OO, Love PED, Li H. Optimal allocation of construction planning resources. J Constr Eng Manage 1999;125:311–9.  Kelsey J, Winch G, Penn A. Understanding the project planning process: requirements capture for the virtual construction site Bartlett research paper 15, a VIRCON project report: University College London; 2001.  Heesom D, Mahdjoubi L. Technology opportunities and potential volume 2: project planning software, a VIRCON project report: University of Wolverhampton; 2002.  Rummler GA, Brache AP. Improving performance: how to manage the white space on the organization chart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.  Winch GM, Carr B. Processes maps and protocols: understanding the shape of the construction process. Constr Manage Econ 2001;19:519–31.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document