Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

2 To What Extent Were Bismarck S Domest

Better Essays
1236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
2 To What Extent Were Bismarck S Domest
To what extent was Bismarck’s domestic and foreign policy a success?
In the period after German unification (1871-1890), Otto Von Bismarck had to face lots of problems both on the domestic and foreign fronts that proved his political and practical skills. Many historians said when commenting Bismarck’s policies after his death that the ‘Iron Chancellor’- as he was also nicked-named - had many successes in both domestic and foreign policies but also had to face some failures, especially regarding domestic policies. Overall, historians all agree by saying that: ‘during the reign of Kaiser William I, Bismarck was the most powerful man in the Empire and completely dominated the government of the Reich’. There have been various schools of thought in the past few years that have claimed that Bismarck was wrong in probably focusing too much on his domestic policies among which were reducing the power that Church had in southern Germany and trying to strengthen the party of the ‘Free Conservatives’, the closest one to him, party of big business that helped and supported him during the years before unification.
Focusing on his domestic policies it is possible to identify four main events as the most important ones in Bismarck’s attempts to put his credo in practice. They are; the “Kulturkampf”, germanization, economic change and his attempts to curb the growth of socialism.
Bismarck started the Kulturkampf (struggle for Civilisation) because in 1870 the Catholic Centre party (Zentrum) was formed. Its goal was to defend the interests of Catholics within the Reich. Bismarck feared them a lot because he thought that they would give their allegiance to Rome and not to the Reich. That is why he harassed them as a ‘state within a state’. Bismarck began his work to reduce the Zentrum power by introducing the “May laws” that instituted Civil marriage, one of the first countries in the world to do so; candidates for the priesthood had to attend a German University and the laws also extended State control over the education of the clergy. These facts can be seen as a success of his domestic policies but as it was shown by history the Catholic Church reacted against this laws and at the end even Bismarck himself believed that the Zentrum could actually become an ally of his government. This last fact can surely be seen as a big failure of his Kulturkampf policy also as Carr wrote: ”the chancellor had to cut his losses before the Empire was seriously weakened by a campaign that had only succeeded in deepening the confessional divisions in Germany.”
Bismarck tried to Germanize the state 's national minorities, situated mainly in the borders of the empire, examples can be the Danes in the North of Germany, the French of Alsace-Lorraine and the Poles in the East of Germany. Regarding the Poles, he was very hostile against them. He introduced many policies against polish rights and freedom. The policies were motivated by Bismarck 's view that Polish existence was a threat to the German state. Bismarck compared Polish population to animals that need to be shot and privately confessed that he would like to exterminate them. in order to achieve his goal Bismarck made Poles marry to Germans, so that they couldn’t claim themselves as full Poles anymore. It can be said that Bismarck was successful in this policy of Germanizing national minorities in German.
It can be said that the period after unification was one of economic prosperity for Germany. This phase of Bismarck’s domestic policies is absolutely a success because so many innovations were introduced into the German economy and these included: the invention of the internal combustion engine (1876), the electric train (1879), the telephone network introduced into Berlin (1881), four-wheeled cars were patented by Daimler and Benz. As proof of all this, it can be pointed out that Germany in 1900 rivaled British economy as continental Europe’s largest. Railways, coal and iron production quadrupled in less than twenty years. The growth of German economy brought about workers’ development as well and this expanded the consensus that the SPD had in Germany. , Bismarck tried to curb their expansion by introducing the anti-socialist laws, but the Socialist party started to revolt against Bismarck’s rules and this led to the introduction of measures such as the ‘accident insurance law’ or the ‘old age pension scheme’--all of these measures were used by Bismarck to calm down protests all over the country and allowed him as well to recover consensus, such that Massie said: ‘Bismarck had given the German working class the most advanced social legislation in the world.’ This phase of domestic policies can be interpreted both as a success to some extent, if one looks at economic and social legislation but also as a failure if one looks at his goal of defeating the SPD.
Focusing on Bismarck’s foreign policies, one can pick out five main events that occurred: formation of the Dreikaiserbund (1873), the congress of Berlin (1878), the Dual Alliance (1879), the renewal of the Deikaiserbund (1881), the reinsurance treaty (1887).
Bismarck had two main goals after unification: limiting the power of France and preventing a war in Europe. In order to isolate France he formed, along with Russia and Austria, the Dreikaiserbund (league of the three emperors). It also insured co-operation among the three powers rather than rivalry which was Bismarck’s primary objective. This can be seen as a great success in his foreign policies. The congress of Berlin was proposed by Bismarck to settle the revolts that were occurring in the Balkans during the 1870s. Bismarck did not want a war to break out and his goal was to preserve peace. Unfortunately for him the results of the congress disappointed Russia, which withdrew from the Dreikaiserbund. Tensions between the two countries grew vastly, and Bismarck’s introduced tariffs against Russian grain imports. The congress of Berlin was a big failure by Bismarck in his foreign policies.
The Dual Alliance was born as a secret pact between Germany and Austria because Bismarck saw he could reap two benefits out of it: securing the German southern frontier in case of a war with Russia and also frightening Russia from seeking a closer relationship with Germany. In 1882 Bismarck wanted Italy to join it, thus making it become a Triple Alliance so that France could lose a potential ally. The Dual Alliance was one of Bismarck’s successes in foreign policy. The Renewal of the Dreikaiserbund was also a great success in foreign policy because it reunited Germany, Austria and Russia together, and it also reduced tensions in the Balkans between Russia and Austria. This renewal also prevented a big European war between France, Germany and Russia. As Carr said: ’Germany faced the real danger of war on two fronts if she was on bad terms with France and Russia simultaneously.’
After analyzing both domestic and foreign policies and after looking at both successes and failures of Bismarck’s policy, it can be spontaneous to say that Bismarck showed greater political skill in foreign affairs than in domestic affairs. This statement can be strengthened by quoting Joll,who says: ‘In the years between 1870 and 1890 it was German foreign policy that dominated the international scene.’
Simone Sacchetti IB History

Bibliography: http://quizlet.com/19577943/ib-history-bismarcks-domestic-and-foreign-policy-flash-cards/ http://italiangermanuni.wikispaces.com/Bismarck+Domestic+%26+Foreign+Policies http://www.historyhome.co.uk/europe/bisdom.htm http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/notes/bismarck.html

Bibliography: http://quizlet.com/19577943/ib-history-bismarcks-domestic-and-foreign-policy-flash-cards/ http://italiangermanuni.wikispaces.com/Bismarck+Domestic+%26+Foreign+Policies http://www.historyhome.co.uk/europe/bisdom.htm http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/notes/bismarck.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kulturkampf Essay

    • 5167 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to evaluate the anti-Catholic legislation introduced in Germany, during the 1870’s. This evaluation will utilise a selection of works by Bismarckian era historians, and will involve an examination and appliance of the current historical arguments and theories on the Kulturkampf, largely from historians like Ross, Smith, Gross et al. who have written extensively on the factors governing such policies and their consequences. The current historiography suggests that the main impetus of the Kulturkampf was the desire to have a united nation with the full population of a common denomination: their German nationality and their loyalty to the Reich.…

    • 5167 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck had a new enemy; he had set his sights upon The SPD, the Socialists. Carr noted that “Socialism, like Catholicism had allegiances beyond the Nation state which Bismarck could neither understand nor tolerate.” The whole of Europe was already fearful of the events that took place within Paris, and even though the socialists were hastily quashed, they managed to overthrow a major European power albeit for a very short period of time. Socialism was on the rise in Germany, and Bismarck was unhappy with this as the current order was under threat. In order to attack the Socialists, Bismarck now needed to set up ties with a different political party on the spectrum and this was the Conservatives. Bismarck learned to a certain extent that he could not use his “Blood and Iron” approach like he did with the Catholics; he needed to take a much more subtle and less outright oppressive approach. As Germany was becoming more and more…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Launched by Chancellor Bismarck in 1871, the KulturKampf was introduced to destroy the political influence of the Catholic Church in Germany and do similar with other small minorities. As a Lutheran and a Prussian he could not understand how German Catholics could divide their loyalty between their country and their religion. 39% of the German population were catholic, mainly in the southern states of the country. These southern states were the most reluctant to unify as a nation as the catholic population did not want to unite with the 61% protestant north population. This was also the same with other smaller minorities which included the growing polish population and the French in the Ruhr and Alsace-Lorraine area. The KulturKampf was therefore introduced to try to restrain the minorities and mainly the catholic influence, especially in parliament, where seats were growing for the Zentrum party.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto von Bismarck’s government in Germany represented a new kind of conservatism in the nineteenth-century Europe that was willing to change traditional conservative beliefs to better lead modern society. Bismarck was a realpolitik, which means he chose political alliances that would boost Prussia and Germany significantly, rather than morally preferable ones. Bismarck was able to successfully unify and govern the German Empire because he believed in the application of modern-day tactics and the idea that in order to grow an empire, you must be willing to put its’ needs first. In 1869, Bismarck showcased this belief when he issued a legislation that granted “all restrictions on citizenship of civil rights based on differences in religious confession…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck was a man of manipulation, provocation, disdain, and most of all he was a man of change. Otto Von Bismarck was a man of manipulation or the changing of one’s surroundings to better fit their needs and desires. Otto Von Bismarck used his ability to manipulate others so that he could help Germany (Prussia), develop a standing in Europe that would make them the number one power in Europe. Otto Von Bismarck was also a man of provocation or the pushing of others for the intent of angering them to take action for or against something. When Otto Von Bismarck was devising his 3 step plan for Germany, he needed to start a war with France but he needed them to make the first move, to do this, he sent France a very mean letter that was…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, the resurgence of Catholicism stirred an anti-Catholic backlash driven by liberals and Protestants with fervent support from the German Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, who was deeply committed to the success of the campaign. Although the kulterkampf 12 (cultural struggle) was intended to bring German unification, the backlash divided society along the lines of culture, class, gender, religion and politics, thereby creating division and discord in communities throughout the Empire. Liberals exploited the existing political intolerance of Catholicism while capitalizing on past prejudices to eliminate the power and presence of the church in the German…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 1890, Germany was more aggressive. Germany wanted to build up its influence in every part of the world. German foreign policy in these years was best expressed by the term 'Weltpolitik' (World Politics). Because German ambitions were extended to many parts of the globe, Germany came into serious conflicts with all other major powers of Europe (except Austria-Hungary) from 1890 to 1914. Bismarck used wars to cause national unity within Germany but these nationalistic feelings soon disappeared once the country was actually unified. There were several different types of people located in Germany, all of them containing different views on the how the Empire should be ruled. Bismarck was a part of the Junkers or upper class, who supported militarism, and didn't like universal suffrage because it was a threat on their way of life. On the other hand, Southern German states embraced a liberal constitution, and a movement towards democracy grew in this region. Politics were not the only difference; religion broke down nationalism as well. Catholics who lived in the Empire…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is A Founding Father?

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bismarck almost single-handedly unified Germany and brought it to one of its most prosperous points in history. Some may say Bismarck was a diamond in the rough. After all, he came from a very unusual background but that did not stop him from achieving greatness even in his younger years. Otto von Bismarck was born the first of april in 1815 in the german…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal on Bismarck’s ship wheel is shown telling the conservative and ultramontane, who is a Catholic, that he will indeed be on top again when the wind blows Bismarck. This document shows how Bismarck is a new type of conservative who forsakes some traditional values in order to do follow the realpolitik value of doing what’s best for the country. In order to do what’s best for the country, Bismarck sometimes has to change sides in order to keep the peace and unite Germany. In Kaiser Wilhelm I’s speech to the people of Berlin in November 1881 (Document 5), Wilhelm I talks about his support for Bismarck’s new welfare reforms that support Christianity and incorporate socialism. Document 5 shows how Bismarck has had to move away from his goal of suppressing the Church in order to do what’s best for the country, which is supporting Christianity. Nevertheless, Wilhelm I does hold a bias as he is a puppet of Bismarck who lets Bismarck implant his new conservative reforms as long as they keep the peace, which is why he is supporting the reforms and tying God and the country together. Document 6 is Otto von Bismarck’s 1884 speech in support of his new bill that helps socialist, but stays true to conservative values but not forsaking his and the…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays