Preview

1881 Was The Main Cause Of The 1905 Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1881 Was The Main Cause Of The 1905 Revolution
How accurate is it to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years from 1881 was the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

In some ways it is accurate to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years from 1881 was a significant cause of the 1905 revolution because they stirred up discontent amongst industrial workers and peasants. The social revolutionaries’ party was formed from ‘the peoples will’. These were a radical party that came around in the 1860’s. They split from the peoples will to form the SR. The majority of the SR consisted of the educated middle class; their aims were for the control of Russia to be in the hands of the people. Another reformist group is the Social Democrats Party that was also formed from the peoples
…show more content…
In the countryside the living conditions for the peasants were deteriorating due to some failed harvests. These failed harvests (e.g. the famine of 1891) caused there to be economic hardship amongst the peasants. This hardship caused the peasants to start taking notice and listening to the views of some radical and extremist parties and they shared similar views. This caused there to be an increased political participation amongst the peasants. Another factor that caused dissatisfaction among the peasants was the bloody Sunday massacre. On Sunday 9th of January 1905 father Gapon lead a peaceful protest towards the winter palace in St. Petersburg. However, the tsar was not at his palace yet had sent out instructions to crush any opposition towards him and his ruling. As the crowd continued towards the palace the army shot down and killed many protestors. This brutality was inhumane and ghastly causing many more people to question the tsar’s rule as he shot down people who were proudly holding his picture to signify their love for him however wanted to discuss change. This highlighted the futility of …show more content…
The assassination alexander 2nd persuaded his following generations (alexander 3rd and Nicholas 2nd) to follow a way of rule that meant that all reformist groups were repressed. It became a criminal offence to oppose the tsar or/and his government. There were Okhrana spies all over Russia that infiltrated and destroyed reformist and extremist groups. This policy weakened the main reformist groups, the populists, socialist revolutionaries and social democrats, but also forced them underground in any way, a further incentive to the reformists. The reformists hated that they were suppressed by the government and that the government now had power people’s opinions by making it illegal to oppose the tsar. The effects of the Russo-Japanese war and the Potemkin mutiny had a great significance to the 1905 revolution as the Japanese forces defeated the Russian armies which humiliated Russia. This defeat also meant that there was a great unrest within the government and within the faith that the people had in the government. The failure of the war undermined support for the tsar and gave encouragement to revolutionaries. This gave the revolutionaries an incentive to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question is focused on the challenges mounted to Tsarist rule in the given period, and the extent to which divisions among opposition groups contributed to their failure. Answers may consider the four main strands of opposition, their internal divisions and their intolerance of each other. A tradition of revolutionary activity was established by the Populists and their appeal to the peasants, though they were weakened by the assassination of Alexander II and the repression established by Alexander III. The Social Revolutionaries tried to gain support among both peasants and townspeople, but were divided between anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks at the 1903 Congress, while the Liberals did not establish distinctive parties until after the 1905 Revolution. A simple description of some of the revolutionary parties will be marked within Levels 1 and 2, and progression will depend on the range and depth of relevant material.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7: In 1905 a revolt was caused by the loss of the Russo-Japanese war. The Tsar tried to calm the people by reforming but eventually took away rights and the reforms fell apart.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far do you agree that the most important cause of the February 1917 revolution was the Great War?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The divisions in the political opposition to the Tsarist rule were the next most important factor. The Populists were a socialist party, supported by peasants and urban workers, who wanted a socialist democracy for a Russian republic. Their assassination tactic strengthened other revolutionaries who opposed the tsarist government and attracted intelligentsia therefore depriving the government of them. This, it can be argued, delayed…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How accurate is it to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years from 1881 was the main cause of the 1905 revolution…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under many aspects it is arguable that the 1905 Revolution and the March 1917 Revolution in Russia were very similar. Both years found the country still struggling from a war (one bringing humiliation and the other incomprehension and outrage); both found hostility from the streets directed against perceived governmental incompetence. Yet something had changed from 1905 to 1917 for Tsarism not to be able to survive the second revolution like it did the first. The reasons are to be researched in the impact that World War 1 had on the country, the October Manifesto issued by Nicholas II on 1905, and the loyalty that the population and the Armed Forces were not willing to give the Tsar anymore.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia was a huge country with millions of extremely poor farming peasants. These peasants lived horrible lives, many were starting to wonder why the tsar had all the wealth and they had none. In 1905 Russian Revolution was sparked off by a peaceful protest held on January 22nd. Thousands of demonstrators such as students, factory workers, revolutionaries, doctors and teachers marched through the cold and snow covered streets of St Petersburg to Winter Palace to protest about their lifestyle, led by a Russian Orthodox priest, Father Gapon. When the peaceful protestors arrived they were confronted by troops, which they fired on the crowd. After the firing had finished several hundred protestors lay dead, this event was called ‘Bloody Sunday’.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II survived the 1905 revolution because of extensive repression, political and economic reforms and Russification. These combined led to his survival because the reforms appeased some of the opposition, reducing its size, and the weak opposition, combined with extensive repression, led to the silencing of the opposition, and hence Tsar Nicholas’ survival. Furthermore, the Russification helped increase the loyalty of some of Russia’s minorities to the Tsar. Firstly, according to Leo Tolstoy, “One third of Russia is under a regime of reinforced surveillance……

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II came into the throne with a mutual attitude as his grandfather, Alexander II. He listened to ministers who recognised the necessity of economic modernisation, but failed to see the potential degree of political change if implemented. Albeit, Tsar Nicholas II’s idea of Russia’s future was one of modernisation and economic development, however with the combination of the political system that still retained the traditional features of autocracy, it looked potentially slim. The Tsar failed to recognise and adapt to the social and economic changes that had taken place. Expressions such as the emancipation under the great reforms of 1860 that made peasants freer and more prosperous gave birth to various political groups, which could no longer tolerate the Tsar’s unquestionable autocratic obedience as acceptable. These social and economic changes were largely accountable for the great revolutionary outburst in 1905. The defiance wasn’t only coming from the side of peasants and the urban workforce in general, but also from the literate middleclass who could no longer stand the autocratic state, consequenting in the establishment of secret political groups and opposition to the Tsar Nicholas II such as social democrats, comprising of Bolsheviks, Mensheviks as well as Kadets and many other social revolutionaries. The…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How accurate is it to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years from 1881 was the main cause for the 1905 revolution?…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays