After a little while longer, I saw the judge come out of a room in the back, and the bailiff had everybody rise. She then sat down, and had the bailiff go let the jurors out of the room that they were all in. The jurors took their seats, and the court was now in session. The prosecutor then proceeded to call her first witness to the stand. The witness walked up to the stand, and the officer of the court had him place his hand on the Bible and swear to tell the whole truth. The witness took his seat, and the prosecutor began questioning the witness....
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…
- 121 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
She began by explaining that Julie Schenecker sent an email to her mother that made her mother feel uneasy and want to call the police. The Assistant public defender explained that the police would be testifying to the events that happened January 2011. When the police arrived they knocked on the door and no one answered so they looked in through the window to see Schenecker laying outside on the back patio. She notes that the police explain the defendant looked as though she had been sleeping for a very long time and that it was a very cool January morning. To cool for her to be sleeping outside in her robe. That investigation quickly turned from a welfare check into a homicide investigation. Ms. Spradley attempted to paint a picture of the events that happened that day to be one of a loving mother who was mentally unstable. She explained that when the police found Schenecker and woke her to question her that Schenecker was unstable and had to be held up while sitting on the couch. She explained that when the police asked her where her children were Schenecker told them that she tucked her daughter in bed and that she tried to pick her son up and put him in her bed, because thats where he slept the soundest when his father was away, but she could not move him so she left him in the vehicle and tucked a blanket around him. Ms. Spradley attempts to make Schenecker seem like an all…
- 1481 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The case of Jodi Arias (Defendant) Case CR2008-031021-001 ("Criminal Court Case Information - Case History", 2014) vs State of Arizona on the murder of Travis Alexander (Victim), the modern day story of sex, lies, violence, and revenge. The trial of State of Arizona vs Jodi Arias is being tried in the Maricopa County Superior Court ("Criminal Court Case Information - Case History", 2014); the following paper outlines the process that follows in the criminal investigation up to the final stage. I have listened to nearly 12 hours of testimony from the key players that I have listed, from the courthouse in Maricopa County. When this particular case first was reported I remember finding it very interesting and was following the progress for some time. I recently became aware that this trial is still in the final sentencing after numerous jury dismissals, mistrials, hung jury, allegations of perjury, prosecution wrongdoing, and defense cover-ups.…
- 3876 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
trial for murder. On his day in court, there are protesters outside the courthouse are…
- 251 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Both sides gave their opening statements and both were long, but really good. The prosecution side gave their statement first and they did a good job at trying to tell the jury why Friar Lawrence was guilty. The defense side gave their statement next, they had a really good speech about how Friar Lawrence was not guilty. Then came the questioning of the witness and this is the time to get all you can for your case. The prosecution questioned their first witness, then the defense questioned that witness. This happened for all the prosecution witness, then it was the defense’s witness to be questioned. The defense would call up one of their witness to the stand and began questioning him/her, then the prosecution team would get to question the…
- 157 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
For this assignment, you will need to locate and read at least 5 – 8 articles from different professional journals and books. You will provide a correct citation of the article and a brief, three to five sentence summary of each article’s content.…
- 1222 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
You have heard the prosecutor explain as how they believe my client is guilty, but the prosecutor did not tell you all the facts.…
- 124 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The prosecutor’s seemed to think they were above the law, however, Judge Gerald Lee knew otherwise. The prosecutor’s offered no apologies and swore there wasn’t any prosecutorial misconduct and that the judge had no right to investigate them to begin with. It is assumed the reasoning for prosecutor Mellin’s misconduct is because his personal involvement with the…
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
ESTJs thrive on order and continuity. Being extraverted, their focus involves organization of people, which translates into supervision. While ENTJs enjoy organizing and mobilizing people according to their own theories and tactically based agendas, ESTJs are content to enforce "the rules," often dictated by tradition or handed down from a higher authority.…
- 685 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right, many people do not know how the trial process works, or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel of the courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person.…
- 1288 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
We have all gathered here today to bring justice to a poor old man, who was murdered in his own house. Everyone in the court was brought here to decide if this man is guilty of being insane or guilty of murder. The murder confused to stocking this old man and claimed that he killed him because of his eye. The murders cut of all his limbs after killing him and hide him under the floorboard. When police came to his house he confused after a few minutes of silence. After a few days, lawyers, jurors, a judge, an expert, a witness, the murder, and I have all gathered here to bring justice to this old man. From my point of view, as the documenter, this trail seems like a tough decision. As of now I feel like the murder is guilty of 1st degree murder. Now at 1:44 PM the prosecution lawyer begins.…
- 663 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Court I attended was Court of Justice. On March 21 2013 after my classes and I got there on time for the court session at 11:00 a.m. It was my first time entering court, the security was very strict, they looked through my purse and made me take everything out of my pockets. After the security check I started looking for courtrooms with trials going on I entered a very interesting Courtroom 10 on the 6th floor. There was many people waiting in that courtroom including attorneys, but the attorneys were standing by the defendants. The trail was open to the public’ the crown stated the facts about the ( ) this wasn’t a jury trail the judge made the decision.…
- 570 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I was a bit intimated walking in due to how big the courthouse looked, but once I arrived, I went to the help desk and a police officer kindly directed me to the room I was looking for. I was a bit surprised when I walked into the courtroom regarding its size. I expected to be a lot bigger due to the media’s representation of courtrooms on TV shows and movies. The courtroom was very plan looking, but neat. When I first arrived only a few people were present and court was not yet in session. Within fifteen minutes of me arriving, the judge, Rachelle L. Harz, walked in and asked if everyone was ready, however, a juror had not yet arrived, and it took approximately ten more minutes for the juror to arrive, and then court was in session. While waiting for the juror to arrive, the plaintiff’s attorney approached me and he was very pleasant, he asked me what school I attended, what my major was and if I am considering law school. He also pointed out that Montclair State University has a very good paralegal program, which is something that I have been…
- 1664 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
I attended the District Court at 201 West Picacho Ave on March 7, 2011. I sat in on judge Mike Murphy's court. Judge Murphy started court promptly at 9:00 a.m. but before I got into the court I had to wait in a long line of about 30 people. then when I finally got to the court house door I had to go through a metal detector where I had to take off my belt and shoes and everything metal on my persons. Then I asked one of the officers working the metal dictator how I could ask to sit in on a criminal court that was going on this morning. She then directed me to court room four. I asked the bailiff if it was ok for me to sit in on court today for my criminal justice class, and if the case where criminal matters. The bailiff then told me that yes these cases where criminal matters and as long as I am quiet and obey the court house rules I was welcome to come and sit and watch the court proceedings. So I waited until the bailiff called everyone in and I went in as well and took a seat in the back row.…
- 1036 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
On September 27th I went to Branch 6 to watch the criminal trial of the defendant Lord Wilson. It was making out to be a weeklong trial and I made it on the second to last day. All I knew was that it was a case involving drugs and had been in the making for a while. When I arrived at the public safety building to listen to the criminal trial taking place I learned firsthand that things never seem to stay on schedule. A recess was taking place when I walked in. While I was sitting there I overheard another person in the courthouse talking about how they heard testimonies from witnesses the day before. That’s what I was looking forward to and now I was worried that I wouldn’t get to observe anything too interesting. During the recess I had some time to take in what was going on around me. The judge was not in the court room. I assumed he was probably in his chambers going over information from the trial that called for the recess to begin with. The prosecutor and the defense attorney were both present in the courtroom, occasionally talking to one another while they waited for the judge to return. The defendant was in the room as well, sitting next to his lawyer waiting for things to resume. There were also a few police officers sitting behind me and from what I could tell at least one was involved in the case against the defendant. While I was sitting there Thomas Gerleman, the defense attorney came over and told me who the people involved in trying the case were. The judge who presided over this court room was Daniel Bissett and the District attorney was Christian Gosset. The A.D.A was Eric Sparr, which another student informed me he was a “drug expert” and had a lot of experience dealing with cases involving the delivering and manufacturing of drugs. Knowing who everyone was made it a little easier to follow what was going on.…
- 1720 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays