12 Month School Research Paper
All around the world kids are jumping with joy, 2 months of summer vacation away from school. While for a selected few million students it is a normal day at school, like it always is… all year. Why is it that students stay year-round? It all depends on your will to succeed. 10-month school causes kids to lose knowledge during the summer, so we need 12-month school to fix that problem. 12-month school is a smarter and more beneficial way then 10-month school.
As evidence to support this, according to the New York Times they stated,” We cannot afford to spend nearly 10 months of every year devoting enormous amounts of intellect, energy and money to promoting student learning and achievement, and then walk away from that investment every summer.” …show more content…
Studies show through decades of research that learning loss is real. For example, a study from John Hopkins University of Students in Baltimore stated,” That about two-thirds of the achievement gap between lower-and-higher income ninth graders could be explained by summer learning loss during elementary years.” Another example is a study by the RAND Corporation reported that, “the average summer learning loss in math and reading for American students amounts to one month per year. More troubling is that it disproportionately affects low-income students: they lose two months of reading skills, while their higher-income peers – whose parents can send them to enriching camps, take them on educational vacations and surround the with books during the summer – make slight gains.” This shows that kids who actually learn during summer are more knowledgeable in school compared to kids who do nothing educational during summer. With 12-month school those “slight gains” will become colossal advantages. This rolls right too our final example. According to the scope magazine article that was mentioned earlier, they emphasized on how far American students lag behind their peers in other countries, like Germany and South
As evidence to support this, according to the New York Times they stated,” We cannot afford to spend nearly 10 months of every year devoting enormous amounts of intellect, energy and money to promoting student learning and achievement, and then walk away from that investment every summer.” …show more content…
Studies show through decades of research that learning loss is real. For example, a study from John Hopkins University of Students in Baltimore stated,” That about two-thirds of the achievement gap between lower-and-higher income ninth graders could be explained by summer learning loss during elementary years.” Another example is a study by the RAND Corporation reported that, “the average summer learning loss in math and reading for American students amounts to one month per year. More troubling is that it disproportionately affects low-income students: they lose two months of reading skills, while their higher-income peers – whose parents can send them to enriching camps, take them on educational vacations and surround the with books during the summer – make slight gains.” This shows that kids who actually learn during summer are more knowledgeable in school compared to kids who do nothing educational during summer. With 12-month school those “slight gains” will become colossal advantages. This rolls right too our final example. According to the scope magazine article that was mentioned earlier, they emphasized on how far American students lag behind their peers in other countries, like Germany and South