Preview

12 Angry Men: Overview

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men: Overview
Sajed Awwad – 12 Angry Men.
Act 1. Part 1: 1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room. 2. The Twelve jurors are given the job, by the judge, of deciding whether a teenage boy is innocent or guilty of killing his father. They must separate the facts from the fancy and provide a verdict of guilty if there is no reasonable doubt to the claims, or non-guilty if there is reasonable doubt. The decision must be unanimous. The charge against the defendant is Murder in the first degree – premeditated homicide (death sentence). 3. Foreman: The Foreman is responsible for keeping the jury organized. He seems calm and neutral in the way that he does not object or counter anyone’s opinions.
2nd Juror: A shy bank clerk who takes time to feel comfortable enough to participate in the discussion.
3rd Juror: 3rd Juror is a small business owner. He proudly says that he started his business from scratch and now employs thirty-four workers. He has a bad relationship with his own son.
4th Juror: 4th Juror is a stock broker. He seems very serious. He deals with the facts of the case logically and uses facts.
5th Juror: 5th Juror works in a Harlem hospital and has experience in living in slums his whole life.
6th Juror: A house painter. Seems to be a respectful man

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Juror #10 is the character who brings in the most prejudice to the jury room as he has formed his decision…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Juror #1 showcased this style of authority when he decided to take the role of Foreman for the duration of the trial.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 5 lived in slums and could relate to the accused but he chose to vote guilty as he felt attacked by the other jurors…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror #3 came into this trial with a moral dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences, he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict, the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    each juror has there own deficiencies or less than ideal qualities, these emerge through their interactions with eachother or their attitudes towards their trial. juror 10 is predjudice regularly using stereotypes to condemn the defendsant without actually considering if what he is saying is true. such as ‘a very big drinker’ or a born liar’ the third juror is guilty of stereotyping the defendant based on age, and he defends his opinions and stereotypes violently in the jury room, such as his near attack on 8th juror at the end of the first act. the play does not let a single character escape unflawed. even 8th juror,…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Like the 3rd juror, juror 4, a stock broker who presents his points in a logical…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juror 10

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two main characteristics of the 10th juror that influence his verdict. The first is that juror 10 is prejudiced against the defendant (most likely he is racist, but we can not be 100% sure). The second is that he is uncaring and impatient.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juror #10 is the character who brings in the most prejudice to the jury room as he has formed his decision from the moment he saw the young boy and sees no reason for him to waste any time debating on whether the defendant is guilty. His prejudice comes from the fact he used to live in the “slums” and consider people like the defendant to be “trash”. This is established when he states “you can’t believe a word they say…they act different… they don’t need any big excuse to kill someone.” Juror #10 never really considers the facts of the case only using them as a pretext to vote guilty and to leave early. When he found it too difficult to change people’s opinions he simply gave up and voted not guilty. “I couldn’t care less”. This shows just how little he cared for the defendant’s life and the jury system unlike juror #3 who deeply cared about the jury system and the case.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The jury is sent to a hot, crowded room to deliberate. Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.” Only one juror votes “not guilty.” That juror, who is known in the script as Juror #8 is the protagonist of the play. As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury. And slowly but surely, Juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of “Not Guilty.”…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Mine is better thinking: One of the jurors thinks that since he is an influential person in his domain, he knows better because of his higher status in society.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A jury is a body of citizens sworn to give a true verdict according to the evidence provided in a court of law by both parties. This verdict is given by the foreman who is appointed by other members of the jury. Other duties of the foreman involve asking questions on behalf of the jury and facilitating jury discussions. The verdict given by the foreman can be either guilty or not guilty as there is no such verdict as “innocent” and this is given after the hearing of the evidence.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When someone gives their opinion, juror number eight discusses these opinions with them, pointing out various elements in their judgements. Another maintenance role that is fulfilled within the juror’s group is the standard setter. This role is played out by juror number one, who is also the foreman. At the beginning of the meeting, juror number one makes sure to get everyone on track and tells the men exactly…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juror 1 or the Foremen is the leader of all jurors, he handles and has authority to lead discussion or voting, but he is not overly smart and wise. He is an assistant high school football coach.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The juror is a very important body of highly capable and well-trusted individuals that decide the facts a particular case and assists the judge in deliberating on the same.…

    • 3774 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twlve Angry Men

    • 4129 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Juror one seems to take charge and wants to get the case over with. Juror two seems to be very shy and timid and avoids conflict by drinking water as an escapist technique. Juror 3 seems to very negligent and narrow-minded. This is evident in the quote “did you ever hear so much talk about nothing?” which is said momentarily after the trial, illustrating his personal bias on the case. Juror 4 wants to “stick to the facts” and base the discussion on evidence only. Juror 5 seems to have no role in the case, playing a quiet and oblivious character. Juror 6 doesn’t have a lot to say regarding the case and seems to play an unimportant role in the discussion of the trial. Juror 7 seems to be very narrow minded, regarding the case as “a waste of time” and has an important role as a biased character. Juror 8 seems to very considerate and wants to give the defendant a chance as no one else will bother to. Juror 9 plays a quiet role in the discussion, although…

    • 4129 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays