Preview

12 Angry Men - 12

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
781 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men - 12
Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting film. As the evidence is brought up to question by the jurors themselves. The complexity of this case grew as the films went on. Then came the hard part, making the decision, guilty or not guilty. Especially when you have jurors that are over shadowed by prejudice that influence their decision. It is only when prejudice is set aside that the jurors’ are able to make a more logical decision on the case. As the movie continues, all twelve jurors slowly arrive in the room. They take a seat according to their jury numbers and begin to discuss the case. The foreman then reviews the case. You learn that the man is accused of killing his father and all jurors must vote guilty or not guilty for there to be a verdict. As the movie continues, all twelve jurors slowly arrive in the room. They take a seat according to their jury numbers and begin to discuss the case. The foreman then reviews the case. You learn that the man is accused of killing his father and all jurors must vote guilty or not guilty for there to be a verdict.
After going over a few facts of the claim, the foreman gives the men a choice. The choice was to discuss the case more into depth or vote on the spot. Everyone agrees to vote on the verdict right then and there. The foreman instructs the men who are choosing guilty to raise their hands and begins counting off who was voting what. Seven or eight hands go up instantly. A few more hands rise up more slowly. The foreman continues to counts. He then asks who votes not guilty. Only one jury member raises his hand, number eight.
At first, Juror 3 appears to be a successful businessman who owns a messenger service. Yet as time goes on, one may see him as a sour and unhappy man. He wants to base the case solely on the evidence presented at the trial. Throughout the meeting in the jury room, Juror 3 disregards all other evidence brought up by Juror 8 and the others. He says that the evidence revealed may

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. At first it was Juror #1, who was at the end of the table, but then Juror #8 became the leader.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reginald Rose’s play Twelve Angry Men emphasises the importance of seeing things from more than one perspective. Set in a New York jury room in 1957, Rose highlights how important it is that the jury discuss all of the evidence from the case in detail and from multiple angles. Representative of this notion is the 8th Juror who is willing to acknowledge alternative views or interpretations. From the outset of the play he goes against the crowd voting “not guilty”. He then considers all of the details of the evidence including the old man’s testimony and the boy’s inability to remember the movie he saw. In contrast to this character, are Jurors 3 and 10 who are portrayed as the antagonists because of their narrow mindedness and arrogance. They are very rigid in the way they apply their single minded world view and they have a reluctance to recognise the existence of another truth. Rose endorses the 8th Juror’s ability to see things from many perspectives and condemns the 3rd and 10th Juror’s inability to do so. This reveals the significance of looking at the evidence from a variety of perspectives in order to create a just verdict.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the outset, eleven jurors vote in favor of convicting the accused without even discussing a single shred of the evidence presented at trial. Only one brave juror refuses to vote. He openly admits that he does not know whether the accused is guilty or innocent and that he finds it necessary to simply talk about the case. What follows is not only a discussion of the particular facts of the case, but an intense examination of the personal baggage that each jury member brings to the room.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Twelve Angry Men, a play by Reginald Rose, was written in 1955 at a time when America was involved in a cold war with communist countries. It shows the strength of a deliberative process that enables individuals, who have “nothing to gain or lose,” to reach a verdict. In the American jury system “everybody deserves a fair trial” and in Twelve Angry Men the defendant gets a very fair trial. All the jurors have their own opinions on the case but in the end a decision is made. The jury, and the audience, never discovers if in fact the defendant did murder his father. His guilt or innocence seems to be almost irrelevant. At the beginning of the play the vote was 11-1 in favour of guilty but the 8th Juror convinces the others to have another vote. As the play progresses more and more jurors being to change their vote and by the end of the play the vote was 11-1 in favour of ‘not guilty.’ The defendant does get a fair trial because throughout the play there was enough “reasonable doubt” for him to be guilty. The 10th juror had no intentions on giving the defendant a ‘fair trial’ and just wanted him to be sent to the “electric chair.” By the play’s end all twelve men had agreed to a “not guilty” vote. The 8th Juror had managed, by simply pointing out “sometimes the facts that are staring you in the face are wrong!” to convince even the strongest advocates of a “guilty” verdict that reasonable doubt exists and therefore the defendant gets a fair trial.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Twelve Angry Men, a boy is convicted of the murder of his father and 12 jurors are chosen to decide his fate. In the beginning, all of the evidence points to him being guilty. However, after a little bit of analysis of the evidence, there is some reasonable doubt. Slowly all of the Jurors accept the boy as innocent except for one very stubborn juror: Juror 3. The differences and similarities between the stage directions and the directors shot selection in the film and in the text affect the readers interpretation of the final scene where Juror 3 says not guilty greatly.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Plot

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plot: "Twelve Angry Men" is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night altercation with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the session takes its course, evidence becomes scrutinised, tempers rise, and the jury room erupts in a shouting brawl because one such juror finds reasonable doubts in the two testimonies that were deemed credible enough to convict. In his fight for an acquittal, the singled out juror found that the testimonial evidence was not only unreliable, but the timely fashion in which both the man and the woman alleged to have seen and heard the defendant were by far insufficient. Upon reaction to his vote, the dubious jurors immediately began questioning the man, not understanding how he could possibly think that way. Nevertheless, the adamant juror held his ground and the votes were: 11 guilty, and 1 not guilty, but the decision had to be unanimous.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror Three has a strong prejudice for the murder because he has a similar experience with his son. He transfer his anger to the suspect, and keep his prejudice for the murder is guilty. Because Juror Three’s…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    11th juror is a watchmaker and he’s German. Because he’s a watchmaker, he has attention to fine detail and is precise. He sticks to the facts and bases the evidence on facts. He’s one who has been taking notes throughout the whole case. On page 29, he says, “Pardon me, but I have made some notes here” and “I have been listening very closely” so that shows how much attention he pays and how he sticks to the facts.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    12 angry men

    • 1965 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juror 3 made reference to his own son and how he has not seen him in 3 years. When he voted, he seems to vote about his own personal life and how his son was no good, run away. He believed that it was ok to beat children into submission and that all kids are rotten and no good. This seems to show a lack of respect for other humans. He values the authoritarian parenting style.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve men meet in one room to discuss whether an eighteen-year-old boy is responsible for his father’s death. An initial vote was cast, where eleven men voted guilty and one juror voted not guilty. Ultimately, the jury decided that he was not guilty after deliberations.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tired men voted guilty, while one lone man voted not guilty. That person was Juror #8. A simple…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The criminal justice system of the United States, when first framed through the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, was a revolutionary breakthrough in contemporary peace-keeping. For fear of becoming like their former governing nation - wherein unreasonable trials were held in such a way that numerous individuals accused of criminal acts were not offered a opportunity to demonstrate their innocence or, in some cases, a trial by jury – the framers of the Constitution created a justice system based on the preservation of the rights of the accused, as well as ascertaining an un-biased truth and dealing justice. This brief explanation on the foundation of the U.S. Criminal justice…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But when another vote is done, Juror #9 (Joseph Sweeney) also pleads not guilty, apparently swayed by Juror #8’s take on the switch blade. The tally is now 10-2, in favor of guilty.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men is a movie about 12 jury members who meet to decide the fate of a boy accused for murder of his father. The jury members were invited by the court and were assembled in a room to make the decision. The movie starts with initial voting in which odds are in favour of boy being guilty by 11-1. One man among the whole jury thinks that there may be a chance that boy is really innocent and all the facts that were presented in court can just be misinterpretation of the situation. He was not satisfied with the current evidences and wanted to have a relook before they make a final call. The way he put his thoughts in front of 11 other jury members…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 angry men

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Secondly, for the 3rd judger, we thought he is leader in the part which supported the “guilty”. Because he is not shy to express his ideas, can put forward some forceful evidence to support his point and he is also a confidence and optimistic guy. But for his behaviors, we don’t think he is a nice guy. Because, in the sixth round of the voting progress, his offensive behavior by blaming the 12th juror and forced him to cast a “guilty” vote. In fact, he forced others to vote the “guilty”. This tough attitude and even elderly rude made him debate with others all the time which eventually led to the collapse of his allies.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays