Preview

11th Century Russia Serfdom Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
671 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
11th Century Russia Serfdom Analysis
Since the formation of serfdom in the 11th century Russia, peasants have been sold to land-owning aristocrats as an agricultural labourer bound under the feudal system. For over 800 years the serfs had no social or economic power, no legal status or right of freedom and no way to escape from their situation. Over 80% of population was peasants and by the late 1600s numerous rebellions have sprung up. However it wasn’t until the 1800s that things finally began to change. Faced with the consequences of the French Revolution Alexander the second decided to “liberate the peasants from above” before they own their freedom by rising “from below”. In 1861 the emancipation reform gave all serfs the right of a full citizen, which included the right …show more content…
Dostoevsky encompasses this mindset in many of his characters, but the most obvious and critical example is Katerina Ivanovna’s desperate attempts to cling onto her past social standings. We see many examples of this throughout the novel, such as when Katerina spends all the money that Raskolnikov gave her on the making the funeral as lavish and opulent as she can instead of saving some for her future. Katerina even brought along her certificate of honour to prove “incontestably that Katerina Ivanovna was of the most noble, “she might even say aristocratic family, a colonel’s daughter and was far superior to certain adventuresses who have been so much to the fore of late” (383). In this scene we can see how Katerina views herself superior to all the other peasants, despite her fallen social standing. Despite the emancipation of the serfs the linage Russia class mindset is evidential in Katherina’s actions, she believes herself better than other due to her …show more content…
With over a million peasants left without a job due to the emancipation, major cities such as St.Peterburg and Moscow were flowed beyond their holding capacity. The growth in housing could not match the growth in population so industrial employers had to house workers in ramshackle dormitories and tenements. Most lived in unhygienic and often freezing conditions; they ate meals of stale bread and buckwheat gruel (porridge) in crowded meal-houses. Things were even worse in the factories, where hours were long and the work was monotonous and dangerous. These living conditions gave rise to a working class that was poor treated, clustered together and very susceptible to revolutionary ideas. The economic revolution and emancipation of the serfs gave rise to a group of people who have experienced rapidly changing social structure and ideals as well as the success of a reform. Raskolnikov embodies many characteristics of this working class including their easy acceptance of philosophical theories. The origins of Raskolnikov’s article ON CRIME can be traced to the philosopher Pisarev, a philosopher who believed that there are two types of people those who live “a customary, dreamily tranquil, vegetative existence” and others who are “eternally alien to the masses, eternally regarding it with contempt and at the same time eternally working to increase the amenities of its life”. Dostoevsky

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, there was increasing criticism of the institution of serfdom. The Russian empire had, since the reign of Ivan III, been a largely serf based rural nation. 85% of the populations at this time were peasants and most of those, serfs. A serf was someone who was owned by the Land lord, usually a member of the nobility, the serf would work there land until there death, with very little freedoms and certainly no education.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ch 18 21 22 ap world vocab

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Why: peasants wanted to end serfdom, taxation, military conscription, and wanted to abolish landed aristocracy.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander ll recognized as the Tsar liberator was known mostly for the emancipation of the serfs. Serfs were the biggest social problem Russia faced as 80% of the population were serfs or state peasants. Serfdom had existed elsewhere in Europe in the 19th century but 1885 Russia was the only major power which kept serfdom. Eventually in 1861 Alexander ll issued an imperial decree which abolished serfdom. This was a huge step for Russia in the 19th century as it showed that they trying to do something about their progression in time. However this did not mean that former serfs were…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite being emancipated, the serfs were still not completely free citizens, which is one of the ways that the Russian state had not improved. It was made difficult for the peasants to get passports, restricting movement around the country. This was done as an attempt to keep the peasants tied to the land, so that Russia’s main industry, agriculture, wouldn’t suffer. Also, it was to keep the nobility happy, because they thought they would lose their workforce, and it was their support that kept the tsar in power.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Russians freed the serfs in order to uniquely westernize their culture because of the…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social structure of 1800’s Russia was a rigid hierarchy. According to the 1879 census 82% of the population were peasants, 4% was the working class, 1.5% were the middle classes, and 12.5% were the upper classes. The peasants were small farmers that used outdated methods. They were mostly former serfs that were freed in the 1861 serf emancipation under Alexander II.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While slaves were almost considered as a hard property of the owners (items had no rights by the owners’ standard), serfs did have little, if no, liberty. According to the Code of Law in 1649, Russian landlords had no rights to kill the serfs, though punishment was permissable. Serfs in Russia, technically, were bound to the land, instead of the landowners. They could have little property and personal items, but that fact would be they were severly exploited. The little rights does not mean that serfs’ conditions surpassed slaves’ much. Serfs still did not have the freedom of movement. In the late seventeenth centuary, serfs could be transferred, if not sold, to another landowners without land. In other words, this change defiantly ignored the concept of serfdom, the bound to land. In both Caribbean territories and Russian empire, landowners had the rights to catch the fugitives (runaways) and the serfs or slaves were often cruelly punished, such as whipping for hours, if not killed.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serfdom and peasant conditions constituted burning issues in nineteenth century Russia because? The size of peasantry meant that economic change depended on new flexibility in rural life…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To begin, St. Petersburg serves as a symbol of the corrupt state of society and its influence on Raskolnikov’s actions. For instance, in the first pages of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov describes the atmosphere of St. Petersburg as “terribly hot [...] with an intolerable stench from the taverns, especially numerous in that part of the city, and the drunkards kept running into even though it was a weekday, completed the loathsome and melancholy coloring of the picture” (Dostoevsky 4). In this case, the imagery of the dirty and disorient city of St. Petersburg is a symbol for the current state of society; imperfect, unequal, and full of corruption. The dysfunctional society of St. Petersburg clearly takes a toll on Raskolnikov, as he quickly finds himself poverty-stricken. In a corrupt society where the wealthy thrive and the poor suffer, he has no choice but to resort to crime in order to make ends meet. Similarly, Raskolnikov’s theory of the extraordinary versus the ordinary serves as a symbol of the imbalance of power in society. For instance, social inequality becomes increasingly apparent as Raskolnikov…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Semyonova’s bleak account of Russian peasantry stands in stark contrast to the romanticized view so common among upper-class Russians. Peasant villages were places of brutal violence, death, sickness, and hard labor. Yet this is the view we need to see and understand. At the time Semyonova performed her research, Russia was barely twenty years away from the most significant period of change in its history – and a revolution that would change the world. By virtue of their numbers, the peasants (and those who claimed to speak for them) would come to play a major role in the decades of turmoil…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Alexander II became the Tsar, Russia was in total disarray. Her once widely respected and feared army was humiliated on the battlefields in the Crimean Peninsula, 80% of the people were in poverty and illiterate. Russia was still stuck in the middle ages while the rest of Europe was steaming in through the Industrial Era. Alexander II saw this as a need for change, primarily in response to the Crimean War, however to be able to do this, he also had to change the Russian society, therefore in 1861 he abolished serfdom, becoming the most significant events in Imperial Russian history, giving him the name as the ‘Tsar Liberator’ (Watts, Peter, History Review, 2014). However, although Alexander II’s reforms did pave the way for a more educated,…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays