Preview

10th Amendment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1329 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
10th Amendment
Jamila Bell
Professor David Curcio
POL 100: American Government
21 October 2013 The purpose of the 10th Amendment is to draw a line between the federal and state government’s powers. This amendment also protects their powers from each other. This amendment has been used to define the federal government’s power to tax, law enforcement and federal regulations. At one point in time this amendment was easily interpreted if it’s not included in the constitution, the federal government cannot give it to the states. Over the years federal power was expanded through cases in the Supreme Court. When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution, they encompassed the 10th amendment, which says “The powers delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, of the people.” The problem with this statement is that it can be interpreted in different ways. The powers of the National government are usually the powers of congress, because they make the laws. The power of congress came from Article VI which states that the constitution is the “supreme law of the land” This means that the states must follow the constitution even if it conflicts with the state laws. The national constitution has jurisdiction over all state constitutions. The constitution mentions very little about states’ rights so it can be hard sometimes to see the thin line between the national and states powers. The court has sometimes had to decide the exact interpretations of the tenth amendment to distinguish national and state power. In the year 1978 Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts which outlawed “any false, scandalous writing against the government of the United States. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison believed that congress didn’t have this authority so they drafted the Kentucky and Virginia Resolution. They believed that the federal government had no right to exercise

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    h. What are some of the historical events that shaped the formation of the U.S. federal government? Select one event you think had a major effect on the federal government. How does this event affect U.S. citizens today?…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maryland. Although the Constitution gave powers to the states under the Tenth Amendment, Marshall implemented the powers of the Federal government by exercising Article 1 Section 8 Clause 18 (necessary and proper clause) and Article 6 Section 2 (supremacy clause). Marshall explained that the Constitution gave the federal government the power to incorporate a bank if it deemed it necessary and proper not for the powers of Congress, but necessary and proper for the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution. Marshall also outlined the rights of the states by enacting Article 6 in his decision. He stated that the supremacy clause prohibited the states from having the power to tax, which would then involve the states power to destroy the powers of the Constitution to…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tenth Amendment clarified that the federal government’s power was limited to what was specifically mentioned in the Constitution, thereby preventing the government from interfering in a case where a free former slave was abducted from Pennsylvania and returned to her former “owners” in Maryland.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions (or Resolves) were important political statements in favor of states' rights written secretly by Vice President Thomas Jefferson (who would later become president) and James Madison in 1798. They were passed by the two states in opposition to the federal Alien and Sedition Acts. Though often mentioned as a pair in modern historical discussions, they were actually two separate documents. The Kentucky Resolutions were written by Jefferson and passed by the state legislature on November 16, 1798, with one more being passed the following year on December 3, 1799. The Virginia Resolutions were written by Madison and passed by the state legislature on December 24, 1798. Jefferson and Madison collaborated on the writing of the two documents, but their authorship was not known for many years. The resolutions attacked the Sedition Acts, which extended the powers of the federal government over individuals inside the states. The resolutions declared that the Constitution was a "compact." That is, it was an agreement among the states. The federal government had no right to exercise powers not specifically delegated to it; should the federal government assume such powers, its acts under them would be void. Thus it was the right of the states to decide as to the constitutionality of such laws passed by…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article was taken from the Boston College Law Review. Katherine Connolly, the author of the note, has her opinions on the topic of the Tenth Amendment and knows the history of it because she is a third year student at Boston College Law School and the senior editor of the Law Review.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    political quiz 3

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6. All city and county governments must provide advance notice of all meetings, hold meetings open to all visitors, and publicly disclose the proceedings of all meetings – all required by which state law?…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles I, II, and III of the Constitution clearly delineate the division of power between the three branches of government in an attempt to keep any one branch from becoming more powerful than its counter parts. Article I clearly defines powers of Congress ‘to regulate commerce among the states and with foreign nations,” among others. I like the way Article II allows each state to take part in the selection of the President and Vice President yet clearly states Congress alone cannot elect them. Article III establishes the federal court system that oversees the court systems of the states. The Judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court is the final arbiter and interpreter of Constitutional law. Article IV clearly establishes a set of checks and balances which apply to all states in the Union clearly outlining acceptable behaviors for all states. While the 10th Amendment states and I am paraphrasing, any power not specifically delegated in the Constitution is decided by the states.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tenth Amendment was written to underline the limited nature pf the powers that was delegated to the federal government. With specific powers delegated to the federal government, the states and people were free to continue…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the founding fathers drafted the Constitution, they made sure to give the federal government certain powers and the same for the states. Yet overtime, the Constitution has been interpreted in different ways hence giving the federal government more power than it was originally intended to have. At the same time the states have lost some of its power as the federal government gained jurisdiction over certain things.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commerce primarily means to traffic or transport goods across state lines for revenue (2). The Constitution of the United States itemizes specific powers for the federal government as conveyed in the Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8 and Clause 3) of the United States Constitution (1). The Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes (5). On the contrary, the Tenth Amendment confers that any powers that are not delegated to Congress by the Constitution are reserved for the states (1). The construction of the Commerce Clause was initially displayed to restrict state power rather than to make it a source of national power (2). As a result, Congress…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Federalism

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There have been many of the events that led to the change in the relationship between state and federal government. The relationship and authority of states and the federal government are governed by the U.S. Constitution. At first, states had the majority power, but over time federal government gained more control. Their relationship has changed over time because the federal government delegated certain enumerated powers while the state government reserved all the other powers by the Constitution. The constitution prohibited the national government from undertaking certain actions, such as imposing taxes on exports and from passing laws restraining certain things, like freedom of speech or religion. Most of these prohibited powers are listed in Article I, section 9, and in the first eight amendments of the constitution. The federal government power has increased where the relationship among the branches has changed as well. The division of power between the states and the federal government has shifted. Some of these changes have occurred in accordance with the amendment process described in Article V of the constitution. The Tenth Amendment gives to the states reserved powers, which means that any power not given to the federal government or denied to the states is reserved to the states. Some of these numerous powers given by the Tenth Amendment to the states, including the power to regulate commerce within their borders and the power to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Supremacy of National Law: The Constitution and federal law are the supreme law of the land; they pre-empt state constitutions and state law. Article 6, section 2 explains that when a dispute occurs between the state and national government the national government pre-empts conflicting state and local laws, making them unenforceable. The hierarchy of the law is as follows:…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalist Analysis

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This appeased the Anti-Federalists because they preferred a weaker central government and feared a powerful central government due to the fact the original constitution did not address the people’s rights allowing the government to in a way, remove them from the people. The tenth amendment appeased the anti-federalists just as much, possibly more than the first amendment because it states that any powers not listed in the constitution are reserved for the states and their peoples. Considering who the anti-federalists are this was a big part of the compromise called the Bill of Rights that was required in order to appease both groups (Federalists & Anti-Federalists) regarding the amount of powers their government was given by the…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a form of federal system of goverment U.S has numerous layers of goverment ranging from the federal goverment to state and local goverments. The federal goverment which is at national level and the state are both addressed in U.S constitution. The congress has the authority to introduce new States to the union, from the original 13 States, the U.S has grown to encompass of 50 states. Each state is Sovereign and does not report to the ferderal goverment. As sovereign indivual within the scheme of the U.S. federal system, each state has its own constitution, elected officials, and governmental organization. States have the power to make and apply laws, collect taxes, and oversight their interest broadly free from interference from the federal government or other states.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays