top-rated free essay

02.03 anti federalist assessment

By saracaji Aug 16, 2015 515 Words
The federalists and anti-federalists had a very intense debate during the ratification of the constitution. Both sides had to make several compromises in order to be able to do something better for the people. I myself agree more with the views of the anti-federalists. They believed that the power should be shared by the states in order for things to be fair. If the Federal government had all the power, chaos would rule our way of life. The individual rights and shared power is what makes things flow smooth in our government. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were some of the many Federalists of the time. They believed that a stronger centralized government should be established. Federalists believed that “[in] [a] republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates.” They had a very strong attitude about a government ruling over the people. They also said that “[in] framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” They wanted to control everything, unlike the anti-federalists that believed that the power should be given to the states in order to create a better government for the people. Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee were the main anti-federalists of the time. Anti-federalists strongly believed in a weaker federal government so the power could be shared and the rights of the people would not be lost. The name does not seem like they like federalism, but they actually just do not believe that a central power is necessary. Something that anti-federalists said is that “[t]he territory of the United States is of vast extent; it now contains near three millions of souls, and is capable of containing much more than ten times that number. Is it practicable for a country, so large and so numerous as they will soon become, to elect a representation, that will speak their sentiments, without their becoming so numerous as to be incapable of transacting public business? It certainly is not.” This quote represents their views of growth and the need for a shared government so chaos would not strike. They also believed that “[as] long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety. “ This is a very true statement. It is very accurate in our society today. Everyone knows that as long as the rights of the people are respected, no sort of trouble will strike the nation. My views are anti-federalists since it has been shown all throughout history that when there is one source of power, they tend to take advantage and violate people rights. The whole point of the United States was to create a new nation where the people had the power and they were not being abused. Anti-federalists were able to see the problem in having a strong centralized government. They knew that separating the powers to the states would create more peace and a sense of safety.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Federalist vs Anti-Federalist

    ...Federalists v. Anti-Federalists Participants in the Debate The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national g...

    Read More
  • The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists

    ...government. Both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist set forth their distinctive views on the quality of representational government, but it was James Madison and Alexander Hamilton vision I feel was the most correct. By accepting their view, it is clear that they propose the best arguments for why the Constitution establishes a greater democrati...

    Read More
  • Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists

    ... the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to prov...

    Read More
  • Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist

    ...The development of the American Constitution was a battle between two opposing political philosophies during the late 1700’s. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties aroused at the formation and ratification of the Constitution. Both sides pointed out many arguments in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The main confli...

    Read More
  • Anti-Federalist vs. Federalist

    ...Essential Questions Essential Question 1: When the constitution was ratified there revolved problems with the economy and social matters. Due to the parties of conservatism and liberalism; which Anthony Hamilton was centralized government and Thomas Jefferson was defense of populism, issues occurred. The importance of domestic and foreign a...

    Read More
  • Federalists and Anti-federalists

    ...Tim Dever Period 4 December 2, 2012 Question: How should the delegates to the Philadelphia [Constitutional] Convention have best balanced the power between States and the Federal government? Thesis: The delegates of the Constitutional Convention could have best balanced the power between the states and the Federal government by bett...

    Read More
  • What the Anti-Federalists and the Federalist Have to Say”

    ...were as controversial as its contents. This is where the fight to ratify the constitution began. The Anti-Federalists had many central arguments against the adoption of the Constitution. The proponents, the Federalist proposed a better argument for defending the ratification of the new Constitution which caused them to prevail. The Anti-Fe...

    Read More
  • Federalist vs Anti-Federalist

    ...it.” Federalists believed this, and fought verbal and written battles against the Anti-Federalists, who disagreed with John Adams. Anti-Federalists believed that in an elite democracy, the elite’s would get greedy and selfish, and only worry about themselves. As I’m on the Federalist side, I believe that John Adams was correct in his st...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.