Preview

Types of Discharge: Performance, Breach, Agreement, and Frustration

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2108 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Types of Discharge: Performance, Breach, Agreement, and Frustration
CONTRACT – DISCHARGE (Pg 161)

Discharge refers to a termination of a contract. After a contract is discharged, the parties are relieved of their obligations under the contract. There are four ways  Performance, Breach, Agreement and Frustration.

Performance
Performance – discharging a contract by performing all obligations as stipulated in the contract.

Precise Performance
Cutter v Powell (1795) The court held that payment was conditional upon the completion of the voyage; payment even part payment may not be made.

In Re Moore & Co and Landauer & Co (1921) The court held that the buyer was lawfully entitled to reject the shipment on the basis of less than full and precise performance.
Exceptions to the Precise Performance Rule
Over the years, the courts have acknowledged that this rule of full and precise performance, if applied strictly, may cause unfairness.

De minimis rule
If the deviation in performance is microscopic, then the contract is deemed to have been performed fully and precisely. What is microscopic is depended on the facts of the case. Acros Ltd v E A Ronaasen & Sons (1933) The HOL held that although the staves were of merchantable quality and could be used to manufacture cement barrels, the contract was breached because the staves did not correspond to the description of the goods.

Divisible contracts
A contract may in certain circumstance be viewed as several independent obligations. These may be deemed as severable sub-contracts. e.g. Employment Contracts Cutter v Powell (1795) in this case, the employment contract was needed to be completed in full before payment.

Substantial performance
Boone v Eyre (1779) According to the principle in the case, where a promisor has substantially performed his obligations under a contract, he can claim the agreed payment, less the amount necessary to make good the defect.

TWO cautionary remarks –
1. If the contact is an entire contract (as opposed to a divisible one) and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The district court claimed that an express enforceable employment contract covered the same subject for the unjust-enrichment claim. On the second motion, the court dismissed the oral contract claim because there was a material price term in the oral contract which was never agreed upon and therefore the contract was not enforceable. Drew appealed the district court for determining there was an express oral employment contract separate and apart from the promise; and it prematurely dismissed the unjust-enrichment claim considering the Thomas Motors transfer was not enforceable.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Ralph Gough was under a preexisting duty to construct the trusses for the Kinney shoe store. The general contractor, Chuckrow, was never obligated to pay for the re-erection of those trusses no matter who’s fault if they fell according to the original agreement. Mr. Gough 's preexisting duty cannot operate as consideration or change Chuckrow 's offer to pay. Therefore the contract was not modified, and Chuckrow is obligated only for the original contract price. Hence Mr. Gough cannot recover the funds. (Robert Chuckrow Construction Company v. Gough, 1968)…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case is an interesting one because it gets right into the core of the confliction between the proprieties of contractual agreement. This case is focused primarily on Osborne Development Corp. and the multiple defects customers are experiencing with their homes. These upset customers are suing this Corporation in attempts to collect reparations for the discrepancies faced. The homeowners who purchased homes form Osborne Development Corp. (ODC) negligently purchased these homes. According to the Home Buyers Warranty ( HBW), “ Any and all claims disputes and controversies by or between the Homeowner, the Builder, the Warrant Insure and/or HBW…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    127 (1979), a case where Brown sued Felsen in state court for money allegedly obtained through fraud in which a consent decree was entered that stipulated that Felsen would pay Brown a specified amount but didn’t indicate the payment was for fraudulent actions. Felsen failed to pay and entered into bankruptcy; Brown asked that the debt be held nondischargeable because it was for money obtained by fraud. The Supreme Court in that case held that claim preclusion did not prevent the Bankruptcy Court from looking beyond the record of the state court proceeding and the stipulation and consent judgment to decide whether the debt was for money obtained by fraud. In its new Archer ruling, the Supreme Court states that the Brown holding is…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Law Study

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IV. REASONING: The legal avoidance, or setting aside, of a contractual obligation is referred to as disaffirmance. To disaffirm, a minor must express through words or conduct, his or her intent not to be bound to the contract. They must disaffirm the entire contract, not just a portion of it. Courts in most states hold that the minor need only return the goods subject to the contract. Even if the minor returns damaged goods, the minor is often entitled to disaffirm the contract and obtain a refund of the purchase price. However, a growing number of states are beginning to put an additional duty on the minor to restore the adult party to the position she or he held before the contract was made. These courts may also hold a minor responsible for the…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kolchek Negligence Case

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When product liability is based on a negligence act then then there is no privity of the contract required.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the case of Flight v Booth the Court of Common Pleas held that because there had been a substantial misdescription, the purchaser was entitled to terminate the contract, notwithstanding the non-annulment clause. Further the purchaser was able to recover his deposit. Cases have come to apply the rule in Flight v Booth where there has been a material and substantial misdescription as such that the purchaser would not have purchased the property.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 5 Case Study

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Millie contracted to sell Frank 10,000 bushels of corn to be grown on Millie 's farm. Due to a drought during the growing season, Millie 's yield was much less than anticipated, and she could deliver only 250 bushels to Frank. Frank accepted the lesser amount but sued Millie for breach of contract. Can Millie defend successfully on the basis of outcome impossibility of performance? Explain”…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a typical person’s lifetime they will encounter many situations where they will enter into a contract with someone else. There are many different types of contracts that we may enter into, some knowingly and even some unconsciously. Buying a car with financing is a type of loan, entering into a new work place, and even getting a haircut is a type of contract.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429, 104 S. Ct. 1879, 80 L. Ed. 2d 421 (1984)…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hoover motor express

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: The Hoover Motor Express Company delivered a written offer to purchase certain real estate to the Clements Paper Company on November 19, 1949. Williams, who is a vice president at Clements, had been authorized in December to accept Hoover’s offer, yet he did not contact Hoover by telephone until January 13, 1950 because he believed he would accept the offer unless he could negotiate a better deal. Clements made a written acceptance of Hoover’s offer on January 20, 1950. Hoover refused to perform, claiming that the offer was revoked on January 13. Clements stated that Hoover did not revoke its offer on January 13. Hoover claimed that Clements accepted Hoover’s offer on January 20. Clements filed suit against Hoover for breach of contract and asked the trial court for specific performance or damages. The trial court ruled in favor of Clements in holding that Hoover’s offer had not been revoked on January 13. Hoover appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed the decree. Hoover petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stonebrook Case

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the question in common law is weather a contract is valid or voidable, the question of breach of contract comes to play. In different occasions such as oral contracts (Jannusch v Naffziger), fraud (McClain v Octagon Plaza), having a minor sign a contract(Yale Diagnostic Radiology v Estate of Harun Fountain) or simply making change at the bank(Barfield v Commerce Bank N. A.)a contract may be binding, breached, it may not be a contract or may be voided.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Jones

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. The issues that the court had to decide is whether the motion judge erred by granting summary judgment and dismissing Jones claim for damages on the ground that Ontario law does not recognize the tort of beach of primacy.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traco vs Arrow

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court affirmed the judgment of the lower court in favor of appellee subcontractor, finding that promissory estoppel was a viable cause of action in a bid construction case. The court found that the award of damages based on this theory was factually supported by the evidence, and that there was statutory authority for the award of attorneys' fees. The determination of the rate of prejudgment interest also was proper.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Held. The trial court erred in granting defendant judgment on the pleadings because the plaintiff’s complaint states a cause of action for breach of an express contract, and can be amended to state a cause of action independent of allegations of express contract.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays