Preview

Tort Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3074 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tort Law
LAW OF TORT
PART–
PART–ONE

Objectives of this Topic
By the end of the topic the learner should be able to:
* D fi iti of tort and related t
Definition f t t d l t d terms
* The difference between tort and criminal law and tort and contract law
* Understand the nature and liability of tort
* Explain the functions of the law of torts
* Explain the capacity to sue or be sued for various p p y individuals and entities
* Understand the specific torts their defences and remedies available in law
* Discuss the general defences applicable in the law of torts So, What Is a Tort?
So

Nope. These are tortes.

So, What Is a Tort?
So

This is a character from a Japanese children’s s o show. Definition of a Tort
The word tort is derived from the Latin word tortus which means crooked or twisted. twisted. In French, tort means a wrong. wrong. Black’s Law Dictionary defines a tort as y 1.A civil wrong for which a remedy may be obtained, usually in the form of damages obtained 2. The branch of law dealing with such wrongs. Definition of tort
According to Sir F. Pollock defined tort is:
"An act which causes harm to a determinate
An
person, whether intentionally or not, not being a breach of duty arising out of p y g personal relation or contract, and which is either contrary to law, or an omission of a specific legal duty, or a violation of an absolute right". i l i f b l right". i h"

Function of the Law of Torts
The law of torts is aimed at:
Determining Rights Between Parties to a Dispute.
Protecting individuals against infringements of their own personal rights eg property, reputation or person.
Preventing a Continuance or Repetition of Harm.
Protecting Certain Rights Recognized by Law.
Restoring Property t its Ri htf l Owner.
R t i P t to it Rightful O
Providing rules of conduct that regulate how members of society interact, and remedies if th rules are f i t i t t d di the l
breached

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.…

    • 9301 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GBL 295 EXAM 2

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages

    victim in the position he/she was before the tort was committed. Difficult to do, so we…

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B law

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This report is going to analyse the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) and torts in Australia. The Wrong Act 1958(Vic) is one of the most important proposed law in Victoria, It has been amendment in 2002 and 2003. The aim of the wrong Act was to legislate for wrongs against a person, Torts is an important part in The Wrong Act. This assignment will presentation in three parts.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study Essay

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case at Gigantic State University, students that were a part of the SFT committed several careless acts. Within this particular case there was a definite crime that was committed because both Prudence’s physical and mental integrity was harmed. Not only could this case be classified according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek, pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible, or “liable,” for those injuries. According to the case, Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An intentional tort is a person deliberately causing harm or loss to another person. Examples are trespassing, causing a nuisance and defaming are intentional torts.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Torts: a violation of a duty imposed by the civil law. When someone breaks one of those duties and injures another, it is tort…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What did Woolley do to show his acceptance of the terms of employment offered to him?…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This means that an individual's wish to protect his or her privacy must be balanced against the needs of the…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many defendants in this case. First and foremost Dale, the loss prevention officer for Wal-Mart, is a defendant because he intentionally restrained Bob against his will and the restraint was unlawful. Dale also failed to follow company rules; Dale was supposed to watch a video that explained how to catch and deal with thieves but decided not to watch the video. The second defendant would be Dale’s supervisor. The supervisor recorded a pass on an exam that dale did not take. The exam Dale failed to write was based on the video that Dale did not watch. The third defendant would be Wal-Mart; Wal-Mart assumes liability because they could be at fault for not properly training staff. Bob would want to take action on Wal-Mart because they have the “deepest pockets” and would most likely be the only defendant with enough money to pay out compensation. Wal-Mart would be vicariously liable for Dales actions.…

    • 2865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • For a tort to be successful - plaintiff must prove existence of certain elements that give rise to a special relationship (e.g. Teacher/student, employer/employee)…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Intentional Torts – involve intentional, rather than merely careless conduct; assault/battery, invasion of privacy, false imprisonment, trespass to land & the interference with chattels.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law, Tort Law

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Giaschi, C. J. (2010). “Margaret Elizabeth No.1” et al., (June 10, 1997). Retrieved July 2, 2010 from http://www.admiraltylaw.com/personalinjury.html…

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Case

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    . Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 5650 Words
    • 23 Pages

    right – legal capacity to require another person to perform or refrain from an action. duty – an obligation of law imposed on a person to perform or refrain from performing a certain act.…

    • 5650 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics