It is no longer unusual to suggeste that the construction of the colonial order is related to the eloboration of modern forms of representation and knowledge
( This has been examined by critique of Orientalism
Best known analysis on Orientalism: Edward Said
Orientalist world is defined by: 1. It is understood as the product of unchanging racial / cultural essences/ characteristics 2. These characteristics are always the opposite of the West (passive/ active, static/ mobile, emotional/ rational, chaotic/ ordered) 3. Oriental ismarked by fundamental absences (of movement, reason, order, meaning)
( In terms of these characteristics the colonial world can be mastered
19th century image of the Orient was constructed in Oriental studies, romantic novels, colonial administrations and world exhibitions
1889: Exposition Universelle in Paris
( To demonstrate French commercial and imperial power
The new apparatus of representation (world exhibiotions) gave a central place to representation of the non-Western world
( This construction of ‘the other’ was important to manufacture national indentity and imperial purpose
What Mitchell speaks about in first half of article: Examines the distinctiveness of the modern representational order exemplified by the world exhibition
( What Arab writers found in the West was the world itself being ordered up as an endless exhibition. This world-as-exhibiotion was a place where the artificial, the model and the plan were employed tot generate an unprecedented effect of order and certainty
What Mitchell speaks about in second half of article: Examines the connection between the world-as-exhibition and Orientalism through reading of European travel accounts of 19th century Middle-East
La rue du Caire
Four members of the Egyptian delegation went to the world exhibition in Paris and were disgusted by what they saw when they entered the