Preview

This is how you say Hi

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
This is how you say Hi
Hey so this is how you say Hi. Hi! You can also say hi by saying Hello, Hola, and bye..... wait that is not right. Bye is how you say bye. You can

Which of the following describes the selection of federal judges?

The president nominates someone to fill a vacancy, and the Senate confirms the choice.

The Senate nominates someone to fill a vacancy, and the president confirms the choice.

The president nominates someone to fill a vacancy, and the House confirms the choice.

The House nominates someone to fill a vacancy, and the president confirms the choice.

Question 2 (Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

Which of the following is true about the Supreme Court justices?

The Chief Justice serves for life, and the associate justices have set terms.

The Chief Justice and associate justices serve for life or until resignation.

The Congress has decreased the size of the Supreme Court over time.

The Congress can remove a justice with the president's consent.

Question 3 (Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

Which of the following cases would be heard first in a state trial court?

dispute over maritime claims

dispute over immigration laws

damages related to an act of war

damages related to a car accident

Question 4 (Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

What is the role of a judge in a jury trial?

The judge listens to both sides of the case to make a recommendation to the jury of what outcome to decide.

The judge makes sure the evidence is presented fairly and that the jurors understand the law and procedures.

The judge chooses who will serve on the jury and will consider the recommendation of the jury in a bench trial.

The judge selects what evidence may be shown at trial and what evidence will be reserved for the appeals court.

Question 5 (Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

During a jury trial,

each side in a criminal or civil case will present evidence to support their position

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the Court restricts the cases it reviews to appeals of a previous decision generally no witnesses are called nor is new evidence presented. Written arguments are submitted for review along with relevant amicus curiae briefs from outside interest groups. Timed oral arguments are then presented to the Court by each party subject to questions by the Justices. The decision of the Court is determined by majority vote and the opinion of the Court along with dissenting and concurring opinions made public by publication in the United States Supreme Court…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (National Institute of Justice, 2008). The court reporter is tasked with recording all elements of the trial in short hand, including instructions to the court, testimony, and rulings. The courtroom clerk “is an officer of the court and documents what happens in a case, orders made by the court during the trial, and the verdict at the end of the trial” (Arizona Judicial Branch, 2013, para. 2). The clerk is also responsible for admitting exhibits and evidence throughout the trial. While the judge, bailiff, court reporter, and courtroom clerk ensure proper procedure through the trial, the prosecutor, defense counsel, defendant, and witnesses present the case for a verdict to be decided.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury Selection. To start the process of jury selection, a group of ordinary citizens are summoned to the courtroom by way of a juror summons that he or she has received in the mail. Once in the courtroom each juror must go through a process called voir dire. Voir dire is a questions and answers session that is facilitated by both the prosecutor and defense attorney along with the judge. This process is done to see if any of the potential jurors are biased or have been predisposed by anyone or prior information the potential jurors may have heard about the case. After the jury has been selected, the case is ready to go to trial.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the judge at trial must be allowed to have the power to engage in the decision making process of…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, we are given the right to a jury trial, one of the most important freedoms that out judicial system has to offer us. A jury consists of anywhere between 6 and 12 registered voters who determine whether a person is guilty or innocent in the act of crime that they are being accused of. Not only do they possess this power in a trial, but they may also judge the laws themselves and whether or not is perhaps unconstitutional, unfair, or cumbersome, in which case they can declare the defendant, the person accused of the crime, not-guilty. Their responsibility is heavy and their power enormous in the outcome of a trial. It is a way of distributing the power so that not just one person has total power, and also allowing society to be involved with their government because the jury acts as the conscience of our society.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | In a jury trial, the judge would decide questions of _______and the jury would decide questions of ________.Answer…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adversary vs. Civil Law

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two legal systems in question are the adversary system, most commonly practiced in the United States, and the civil law system, also referred to as the inquisitorial system, most commonly practiced in European countries. Both systems have the same goal; to find the truth. However, each system has a very different path to justice. The adversarial system implies that two parties assume opposite positions in debating the guilt or innocence of an individual. In this scenario, the judge is required to be neutral at the contest unfolding before him or her. The role of the judge in this arrangement is to ensure the trial proceeds according to the procedural rules of trial or due process of law and that evidence entered is done so accordingly. The basis of this approach in criminal matters in which two sides engage in debate and battle about the guilt or innocence of an accused and since each side wants to win, then the debate will foster a critical look at the issues and the evidence to be examined by both parties. By engaging in this discourse, the truth should emerge as the judge watches on. This means that the roles played on both sides are very distinct. The defense counsel as one adversarial party gather the arguments to defend the client and attacks the credibility and worthiness of the evidence presented. The prosecutor puts forth the arguments on behalf of the state and gathers and presents the evidence pointing that the accused has committed an offense. The judge is the referee and arbitrator on issues related to clarifying what the law is. The judge does not intervene on any side except where procedural fairness is jeopardized by either party as dictated by the Sixth Amendment. In an inquisitorial system, a judge is involved in the preparation of evidence along with the police and in how the various parties are to present their case at the trial. The judge questions witnesses in depth and can even call witnesses to appear while prosecution and defense…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the verities of cases that must be heard. When a case is failed the defense attorney takes…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judge listens to both sides of the case to make a recommendation to the jury of what outcome to decide.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can sue each other for money but can’t put each other in jail, only the state has the right too.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition of Evidence

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A general rule states that trial judges have the inherent power to admit or exclude evidence at trial. A judge is there to oversee the entire case and ensure that nothing gets out of control. Judges have the responsibilities to make decisions concerning the constitutionality of law enforce activities, to protect witnesses from overzealous examination and cross examination by counsel, they are also to take judicial notice, ruling on issues of law, acting as a fact finder in some cases, and lastly to determine competency of the witness and evidence admitted being brought to testify.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Courtroom Workgroup

    • 1217 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A judge is the ultimate authority in the courtroom, and satisfies both the rights of the accused and public interests in justice administration. Judges on the Federal level are nominated by the President and those nominations are confirmed by the Senate. Judges on the state level are put in power by election or appointment by the Governor. Judges must weigh objections, decide on the admissibility of evidence presented, maintain order, and discipline on anyone who interferes with the operation of the court. In trials with no jury, or a bench trial, the judge will determine guilt or innocence.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juries exists in the criminal trial to listen to the case presented to them and, as a third, non-bias party, decide beyond reasonable doubt if the accused is guilty. For the use of a trial by juror to be effective, no bias should exists in the jurors judgments, the jurors should understand clearly their role and key legal terms, and the jury system should represent the communities standards and views whilst upholding the rights of the accused and society and remain cost and time effective.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays