Preview

Theories of Crime

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories of Crime
Theories of Crime
Biological Positivism
Lombroso (1876) believed that evolution could explain behaviour. He thought that many criminals were found to have a distinctive physique, such as protruding ears, sloping foreheads, long arms, a prominent jaw and a receding chin. He described criminals as being ‘atavistic’ similar to an earlier form of evolutionary life. Sheldon (1949) also believed a criminal was determined by someone’s body type, he believed there were three body types, endomorph: short and fat, ectomorph: skinny and frail and mesomorph: heavy and muscular. He found that 60% of delinquents and 31% of non- delinquents were mesomorphic.

Free Will
The belief that humans are rational and have the ability to make decisions for themselves. People can understand the difference between right and wrong and therefore chose to either commit crime or to follow the law. Beccaria (1764) believes that an offender is therefore someone who has no self-discipline, either that or they deliberately choose to break the law.

Control Theory
Claims to ask people why they do not commit crimes rather than why they do. This theory focuses on the methods used to control crime. It is believed that there are motivations to commit a crime such as financial profit, social status and even the enjoyment of committing it. Hirschi (1969) believes that an offender is more likely to commit a crime with their attachments to society are either weak or broken down.

Labelling theory
Becker (1963) believed that people were not offenders until they were labelled as being one. Labelling theory considers the reactions of people and the impact of their responses. Once a person has been given a label such as a ‘thief,’ they tend to segregate themselves from society, and become an ‘outsider.’ They then may live up to the label that they have been given.
Strain Theory

Strain Theory
Merton (1938) believes that people will commit crimes when there is a ‘strain’ between cultural goals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to discuss the three major theories of criminology. This paper will talk about the theories that best and worst describe why crime happens. The three major theories of crime are: biological, psychological and sociological. In further examining this paper you will see discussions of personal opinions of the author.…

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi's Control Theory

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The thoughts and ideas of this theory were put together in ‘A General theory of crime’ (Michael Gotfredson and Travis Hirschi 1990). This theory is more of a refined control theory than originally presented over 20 years earlier by Hirschi. Within this theory it is stated that crime was claimed to have flowed from low self control. ‘It can be enjoyable because it involves the exercise of agility, deception or power, and it also requires a lack of sympathy for the victim’. But it does not provide long or medium term benefits. In short, it is, they say, likely to be committed by those who are ‘impulsive, insensitive, physical, risk taking, short sighted and non verbal’ (1990:90). Gottfredson and Hirschi argued that the types of people that who become involved in crime also engage in such behaviours that provide ‘short term gratification’…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that crime and deviance are the product of using labelling processes (21 marks)…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Constructionism

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay will begin by defining key terms Jewkes (2012) defines Crime as the violation of law, however it has been extended to include social harm, which is culturally relative and ultimately depends on theoretical position of those defining it. Jewkes also defines Deviance, as a social and usually moral (as opposed to legal) concept to describe rule breaking behaviour.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Matza, D. & Sykes, Gresham (1961). Juvenile Delinquency and Subterranean Values. American Sociological Review. 26(5). 712-719.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology Chapter 9

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Early studies showed relationship of criminal behavior with head shape 
(Lombroso) and body size (Sheldon), but they were faulty…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. According to labeling theory, the major element in determining the criminality of an individual is the reaction of society.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The labelling theory is a micro interactionist approach, this is because it focuses on how individuals construct the social world through face-face interactions. It recognises the concept of the ‘procedural self’ where ones identity is continuously constructed and recognised in interaction with significant others, this results in the individual’s behaviour, including that related to crime and deviance.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Controls

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Critically evaluate the claim that it is social controls that prevent us all from committing crime.…

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Q. Wilson and Richard J. Herrnstein 1985 put forward a biosocial theory of criminal behaviour. In their view, crime is caused by combination of biological and social factors. Biological differences between individuals make some people innately more strongly predisposed to commit crime than others. For…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Explaining Crime

    • 3366 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The following section will use strain theories to analyse factors and causes that lead the offender to commit his crimes. Anomie and strain theory will be used here with respect to Merton’s concept of “retreatism” (Merton, in Alder, Laufer, 1995), as well as Agnew’s general strain theory (GST) as it accounts for individual and emotional strain derived from negative relationships (Agnew, 1992). These will be the primary theories used for analysis in this paper as they are most relevant. The final section will involve the application of SLT.…

    • 3366 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    His theory came from his study of prosecuted criminals both deceased and live. Lombroso differentiated the criminal bodily fitness to those of non-criminals, as well as people who were identified psychotic. In his study he found, to some degree those offenders he made research on were prone to have unusual bodily features, i.e. large jaws or unusual teeth. In his opinion these characteristics caused offenders to engage in criminal activities. This…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in the new perspective, a deviant act becomes deviant only when it is labelled as such. This attracted criticism over the nature of harmful acts that are not witnessed and reacted to and whether or not the theory implies that they are moral as long as they go without social reaction. Becker tackles this criticism by arguing that the theory does not presume to be absolute and by underlining four main categories which include the Secret Deviant. Also, self-enforcement is not dismissed as a deviant might consider their own actions wrong and self –label and self-punish.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories Of Criminology

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The debate regarding criminality being a result of nature or nurture has been a topic of discussion both within criminology and outside of it for decades. Criminologists brought forward theories attempting to address and explain this paradox, and explanations for crime included psychological, sociological, economical, biological reasons, amongst…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics