Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Marcoses

Good Essays
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Marcoses
History Channel’s coverage on the Marcoses

Summary

When Ferdinand Marcos became the president of the Philippines, in his hands laid the full power and responsibility over the country. After a few years of his reign, his lust for power became demanding. So, then he decided to declare Martial Law, that was in year 1972. He had full control over businesses and also the media. Some people became resistant because they were afraid, but there was one man who wanted democracy to reign supreme. That man was Ninoy Aquino, he fought till the very end but when his assassination happened, it was going to be a crazy ride for Marcos. He tried his very best to retain his power over the Philippines, but then shouldn’t the government be afraid of its people and not the other way around? This is when the People Power happened, this was a non-revolutionary war. Guns and tanks didn’t take over but rosary and prayers; soldiers who were assigned to fight with the people surrendered and joined the peaceful movement. Then, the predictable fall of Marcos’ reign happened. Followed by the fall is their immediate leave from the Philippines, and after a few years was the death of Ferdinand Marcos. Imelda came back to the Philippines, she did everything to clear the name of the Marcoses but everyone knew it was never going to be easy. Trust cannot be easily mended when a wound has already been made.

Analysis
Long gone are the days of the Marcos regime but even up until now, people seem to not let go of the horrid past. The scar that the Marcoses left on the Filipino people and on the country itself caused a lot of destruction and hatred.
In 1972, Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law, in his hands laid the full control over the Philippines. People who will not obey his commands will be put to jail or worse be killed. Oppression and tyranny was put beside his name. He wanted the people to learn but then cruelty and punishment is not the true method of learning. But then when you push someone to their limits, then expect an outcome that will not be what you were expecting. And so, a vast number of people wanted him out of the throne. They risked their lives just to fight for democracy so that their children may someday experience a life worth living. Furthermore, the people power was one of the most remarkable and historical happenings in the Philippines, because of this we are known as a wide Catholic nation; wherein we put ourselves in the presence of God.
If we look closely, we can tell that this was the 2nd time that this happened in the history of the Philippines. Our national heroes, like Jose Rizal and Andres Bonifacio, also fought off their guts for us to be free from the clutches of the people who wanted absolute power lying in their hands. We can also say that history can and will repeat itself. The future is unpredictable and so are the people in our government.

Conclusion Marcos wanted to gain power over his own country. So, then he did something to get it. Martial Law was like dark days and nights which invaded the whole nation. It was something nobody in a country would want to happen to them. But what we should learn from this is that a bloody revolution is not really necessary in attaining democracy or freedom. Blood being shed is obviously not something good to remember and reminisce. The government should also be considerate of its people, they should be thinking of their welfare. They should think of their people first before themselves because when something the people don’t like happens, the government should start on getting under their thousand piles of security blankets.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the end, the annexation of the Philipines caused unhappiness in the both the Philipines and in the United States. Filipinos wanted idependence and Anti-Imperialist didn't want to take this from them. The United States should not have annexed…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Philippines, people power has always been a significant manifestation of pluralism because of the degree of consensus underlying the political process of transfer of power. First used in February 1986, this popular Filipino mass protest was aggravated by the late former president Ferdinand Marcos’ attempt to steal the results of the snap elections he called in order to validate his presumed…

    • 4784 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    history of martial law

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On September 21, 1972, Marcos issued Proclamation 1081, declaring martial law over the entire country , claiming that it was the last defense against the rising disorder caused by increasingly violent student demonstrations, the alleged threats of communist insurgency by the new Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), and the Muslim separatist movement of theMoro National Liberation Front (MNLF). One of his first actions was to arrest opposition politicians in Congress and the Constitutional Convention. Initial public reaction to martial law was mostly favourable except in Muslim areas of the south, where a separatist rebellion, led by the MNLF, broke out in 1973. Despite halfhearted attempts to negotiate a cease-fire, the rebellion continued to claim thousands of military and civilian casualties. Communist insurgency expanded with the creation of the National Democratic Front (NDF), an organization embracing the CPP and other communist groups.…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The modern history of the Philippines has been defined by the domination of outside powers and resistance to them. The Philippines was a formal colony of Spain until 1899 and then de facto a colony of the US until the Second World War. Thereafter it suffered under semi-colonial domination - formally independent but with regimes that did the every bidding of the US. Nevertheless resistance to imperialism and its Filipino agents has been a prevalent feature of life. Sometimes this has taken the form of an armed struggle against military occupation, at other times as a mass movement against governments and regimes complicit in the domination of the Philippines. It is the question of how these resistance movements fight and for what aims that has shaped the course of events in the 20th century and will shape them in the years to come.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During 1960’s the Philippine economy has experienced repeated boom-and-bust cycles in the 5 decades since the nation achieved independence from the United States. In 1960s its economy ranked as the second most progressive in Asia, next to that of Japan. After 1965, when Ferdinand E. Marcos became president, the nation experienced economic problems and social unrest, especially from the 1970s, when corruption and cronyism (the practice of appointing friends to well-paid posts regardless of their qualifications) took hold. The Philippines in the late 1960s and early 1970s saw a rise student activism and civil unrest against President Ferdinand Marcos who declared martial law in 1972. The peaceful and bloodless People Power Revolution of 1986, however, brought about the ousting of Marcos and a return to democracy for the country. The period since then, however, has been marked by political instability and hampered economic productivity.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Turncoatism

    • 9229 Words
    • 37 Pages

    Riedinger, Jeffrey. (2001). Caciques and Coups: The Challenge of Democratic Consolidation in the Philippines in the Philippines in Dynamics of Philippine Politics: A Canon of Readings, Mimeographed. UST: Faculty of Arts and Letters, p. 32-52.…

    • 9229 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: BBC News. 2007. “Guide to the Philippines conflict”, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1695576.stm, Retrieved on 20th April 2014.…

    • 5390 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Martial Law. Marcos knew that the crime rate at that time were significantly high and that he…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The year 1986 opened the door to a new era of military interventions in Philippine politics. The EDSA People Power Revolt showcased a total makeover in the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ (AFP) image, evolving from an armed forces subservient to a 20-year dictatorship (Selochan, 1989:1) to an armed forces dubbed as the “protector of the Filipino people[i]” (De Leon, 2005: 47-49). However, barely four months after installing President Corazon C. Aquino in office, various elements in the military – Marcos loyalists, Guardians, and the RAM-SFP-YOU staged four successive failed coup attempts and two aborted coup plots from July 1986 to August 1987 (Selochan, 1989:11-15). Then again, in December 1989, just when civilian authority over the military seemed to have already been functioning, another failed coup attempt was launched, which almost toppled down the presidency. After a decade of calm at the close of the century, the AFP barged once more into the political limelight when former AFP Chief of Staff Gen Angelo Reyes, along with the commanders of the Army, Navy and the Air Force, unexpectedly withheld their support from their Commander-in-Chief at the height of EDSA Dos, which eventually forced the former president to leave Malacanang (Trillanes, 2004:14).…

    • 8201 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marcos Dictatorship

    • 929 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Martial law is imposition from the president due to from the crisis of the country in terms of order and security. It is usually imposed when civilian authorities and the government doesn’t function properly. As a result, the discontent public executes protests towards the government. It is controversial because it gives absolute power to the president; military forces are then deployed to maintain order. The three branches of government executive, legislation and judicial are removed thus having no power. It is a means to have control over the public and used to maintain law. Several rules come along with martial law such as curfews, stricter laws and the absence of civil rights. Simplified, that means the military can do anything and no action would be taken to have their actions justified. This leads to my next topic as to why Philippines were in a 21-year period as a president and 9 years in martial law.…

    • 929 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philippine Martial Law

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With this notion, Martial Law in the Philippines only proves that during that time, Human Rights and Democracy is not totally practiced in the whole nation. The circumstances of arrests, detentions and searches made without court orders are common practice during the martial rule. The fundamental principles of legality and due process have been neglected, with security forces having unprecedented powers given by the head of state under this martial law. Election frauds were also perceived. Justice among those involve were deserted and abandoned and Justice for the country’s democracy were put in to trash.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philippine Presidents

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | Stabilization of government finance by means of more effective collection of taxes, imposing new tax laws, and getting loans from foreign banks and governments; Greater production of rice by promoting the cultivation of “miracle rice” and other fast growing rice seeds, the construction of more irrigation systems, and giving financial and technical assistance to the farmers; Building of more roads and bridges, schoolhouses, and other public works. The Philippine National Railways…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Government was restructured according to Will of Marcos and it has been shielded from public scrutiny and criticism; thus the perpetuation of irresponsible acts. (Endriga, 2001)…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Damaged Culture

    • 7590 Words
    • 31 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES THE COMING OF THE AQUINO government seemed to make the Philippines into a success story. The evil Marcos was out, the saintly Cory was in, the worldwide march of democracy went on. All that was left was to argue about why we stuck with our tawdry pet dictator for so long, and to support Corazon Aquino as she danced around coup attempts and worked her way out of the problems the Marcoses had caused.…

    • 7590 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forty years after the imposition of martial law in the Philippines, in accordance with Presidential Proclamation 1081, dated September 21, 1972. Most Filipinos have their different opinions and speculations why former president Marcos declared martial law, was it to restore the order of the nation that was being torn down by, himself, the leader of this very own nation or was it for his personal reason to extend his reign beyond December 30, 1973.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays