Preview

Senate to Blame for 49bc Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1003 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Senate to Blame for 49bc Civil War
o “The Senate was regarded as the central institution of the Roman state” (Beard and Crawford). o However during this period they did not live up to this duty to direct the Roman state. o Rather corrupt and after supremacy of the whole empire, using and manipulating certain power individuals in the form of PO, by breaking the constitution to achieve these means o It rejected and punished Caesar continually when he simply wanted equality to reach the same heights as PO. o This created monumental holes in the system and thus the true instigator of the civil war was not PO or JC, but the Senate.

o During period Senate adopted a policy of building up powerful individuals (PO) who were used to lead and direct the assembly only when it suited them o 1) Allowing him to command an army at only 23, which led him to gaining his first triumph something not earned till the end of ones career or not at all o 2) Lex Gabinia- describe it & Lex Manilia o “His extraordinary career embodied everything the oligarchy opposed, yet they were largely responsible for granting many of his exceptional commands” Bradley

o The fault in this policy was made clear when these individuals became too powerful and together with their armies were able to lay siege on Rome and control all political aspects. o One such example of this was his first consulship in 70BC. “He delayed disbanding his army despite orders to do so, therefore the senate had no choice but to grant him yet another illegal command” Bradley in the form of a special decree passed for him to gain consulship. In the previous year the Senate passed a degree exempting PO from the usual age limit and experience of sub consular experience. o As such he was able to “vigorously help undo Sulla’s legislation by restroing the tribunes to their ancient powers” Suetonius o What the Senate allowed him to do as consul proved disastrous to the state as he set dangerous precedents and made it harder for the Senate to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As Consular Potestas, Augustus could override…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Next Caesar was appointed Consul for the next ten consecutive years and was permitted to hold onto any office he desired inclusive of the Tribune. Subsequent, Caesar made changes to the title of ‘Imperium.’ Whereas Caesar could be vetoed before, the modifications Caesar made made him ‘immune from legal prosecution’.…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sulla's Reforms

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Finally, the last of Sulla's main attempts to restore the Republic of Rome were characterised by his persistent acts to curb the influence of magistrates. He tried to achieve this through his redrafting of the 'Lex Villia Annalis', increase of praetor and quaestor populations and also by depriving censors to draw up Senate roles. This allowed the political and military struggles and challenges of Rome…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * He relied on much on his own judgment, even in areas where he lacked expertise, causing some diplomatic problems with the European powers. He was slow to act, and kept his Secretary of State (Seward) from acting in a timelier manner, in the Trent Affair, needlessly complicating relations with England.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some years into the republic age of Rome, Marcus Cato was born into a less-than-impressive, but honorable home. Over time, Cato would prove to be a great statesman as well as earn many other titles and honors. However, before one can understand the great man, one must understand the society that shaped him. At this time in its history, Rome had formed its republic by vesting the power in the people, represented by the senate. Despite there being instances of corruption, the republic naturally defended against corruption by keeping too much power away from just one man and dispersing it to the many. Under Roman tradition the citizens lived praiseworthy family lives, and ancestry, as well as different traditions, shaped those lives. On top of those two sorts of body politic, the republic and the family, a true Roman citizen had a balanced and temperate form of self-government. Each of these three traits of Rome helped to shape not just Marcus Cato, but all of its inhabitants. Being well versed in Greek tradition as well as very knowledgeable in Roman history and politics, Cato came to be a very prosperous political figure, war hero, and most of all a well-rounded model for a republic even today. It was mostly his moderate combination of all of these traits through temperance and a strong code of morals that allowed Cato to achieve this status.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Ceasar Study Guide

    • 2824 Words
    • 12 Pages

    * Yet while Caesar may not be unduly power-hungry, he does possess his share of flaws.…

    • 2824 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm 3 History

    • 8039 Words
    • 33 Pages

    o Pompey and the senate claimed that Caesar was a tyrant and they had the…

    • 8039 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Indus River Valley

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To avoid Caesar’s fate, Augustus charmed the Senate and the people by pretending to give up power. But a series of disasters panicked Romans. They became convinced that only he could save them and begged the Senate to vote him absolute ruler. Augustus agreed, but did so cleverly. He convinced Romans that he was ruling in the best traditions of the republic, but actually was an absolute ruler creating a dynasty. The Romans bought it.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * After many years of service abroad, they found their farms deteriorated that they chose to sell their land…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The senate was already a powerful body in Rome's government, these events, however greatly increased its power. Constitutionally, the senate was an advisory body; the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287, gave the power to make decisions to the Concilium Plebus. In practice, however, the senate was the governing body of Rome and it ruled unchallenged throughout the second century. This power was obtained through its successful control over Rome's wars of expansion. In fact, the crisis caused by the Second Punic War helped the senate's rise to power more than any other single factor. The senate consisted of ex-magistrates who had an enormous amount of experience in government. These senators took control of Rome and showed real leadership, particularly after Cannae. They provided loans, slaves for the army and food and arms, thus ending the war successfully and increasing their prestige. The influence the senate held over the magistrates was another factor in their increased power. Even though Roman magistrates were not obliged to seek or follow the senate's advice, they would usually submit all important issues to the senate before showing them to the assemblies. The senators would have been able to keep a tight control on the actions of the magistrates even if they didn't volunteer their plans. The senate could find another magistrate to veto any unsatisfactory motion they put forward. The lex Villa Annalis was passed in 181 as a check on any over-ambitious…

    • 811 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coriolanus proves to diverge from Shakespeare's standard form of writing, in the fact that politics, is not a governing factor (unlike his previous plays). Rome is experiencing a "fledgling demorcracy", which is proved to be unsuccessful. This failure can be attributed to the idea that the democracy is, in fact, unfair, seen in multiple instances when the Tribunes oppose lawfully correct actions, for example persuading the Plebeians to act against Coriolanus, which inevitably led to his and their downfall. Another example that proves politics to be of low importance is Coriolanus's reluctance towards being Consul. This shows that honour is placed above political ranking.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    and non-electoral positions (federal civil (Petit-Dutaillis, 1964) in which he demonservice, executive and congressional strates how the political ideas implicit…

    • 5724 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beard and Crawford present their material in an easily readable, and quite short, manner. They have separated their arguments into that which the reader can comprehend and associate with outside information concerning the history of Rome. However, there is a problem, regarding the historical aspect, whereas Beard and Crawford do not give particular examples of historical events, or the like. It is not a problem if the reader has an understanding of the subject, but if someone were not to possess such knowledge, then they would be at a disadvantage, because of this lapse on the authors’ part. For instance, the statement, “As the political system came increasingly under the dominance of powerful individuals, so those individuals, tended also to monopolize links with divine,” does not provide an adequate perception to the certain individuals, which can be learned in other fashions to represent people like Julius Caesar, who served as Pontifex Maximus. Considering this lack of direct historical evidence, the book appears to be more based in a literary manner, with indirect historical evidence, as mentioned. In the literary sense, the authors give their supposition into why the Republic…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beard begins her history of the decline of the Republic by citing Sullust’s description of greed as the primary downfall of the Republic; however, violence - “the legacy of Romulus and Remus” (215) also was instrumental. This began with Tiberius Gracchus, a “thoroughly honest and well-meaning man . . . so entirely convinced of the righteousness of his own intentions and the wisdom of his own measures” (Oman, 12) that he resorted unconstitutional and violent measures to pass the reform he wanted.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays