Preview

Research Paper Criteria

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
575 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Research Paper Criteria
For those interested in the juicy issues of LIABILITY and its role in Criminal (Public law) and Civil (Private law) realms here is a brief overview:

I want to start with a repetition of what Prof Naylor said about criminal acts: to be convicted there needs to be proof of the ACT and the INTENTION (Actus Reus and Mens Rhea in latin if you want to sound smart…). This applies to liability.

So there are 2 main veins of LIABILITY applicable to law (which as a concept is loosely defined as something disadvantageous – a glitch!)

A. Strict B. Absolute

A. Strict is usually referred to as “no fault” which makes it sound much nicer than it is. It is actually quite the opposite as it basically means that no matter whether there was fault behind the injurious effect of an action – the responsibility still falls on the actor that caused it. So if I am responsible for my car crashing into a car in front of me (because I was driving it) it does not matter that the breaks were faulty and I had no idea (my driving was safe!) I still have to pay for the other guy’s broken tail-light. What does this mean? You are assessed in terms of your ACTUS REUS (the act) regardless of whether or not there was MENS RHEA (the intention). In private law (civil matters) – there is no real need to prove intention. You didn’t pay your taxes – you get the punishment… It does not matter that you did not know you were supposed to. Srict liability DOES at times appear in Criminal law but only to prove recklessness or negligence (which is not exactly deliberate acts but ones borne of extreme stupidity!). In public law (criminal matters) it is important that you are punished for your bad intentions along with the actions these caused.

B. Absolute is more prevalent in Criminal law as fault (MENS RHEA) must be present and must be proven. Sometimes you don’t even need ACYUS REUS in order to get in trouble for MENS RHEA such as with “attempted murder” or “conspiracy” cases – you may not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lit1 Task 1

    • 1519 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Liability - The liability is shared by all partners. If one partner does something negligent, all partners can be held liable.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beechy6eVol2 SM Ch12

    • 6352 Words
    • 54 Pages

    The definition of a liability embodies a future sacrifice of assets or services, a present obligation, as a result of a past transaction or event.…

    • 6352 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Causation: Having been part of negligent activity, however not legally responsible under the law…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nominate Delicts

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The liability for nominate delicts arises when deliberate wrongful act or omission causes loss. There has to be a wrongdoer at fault (intentional or unintentional) and a victim with loss or injury to raise legal action. The loss has to be of the kind recognised as attracting legal liability.…

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gng4170 Lecture Notes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    EXAM PREVIEW!!! – Negligence hypothetical question – Given the facts of a case, describe all relevant material covered in the notes, give legal justification and plausible decision.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The expansion of criminal responsibility has broadened the scope of liability and defences applicable in relation to Offences Against the Person.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Long Island Railroad). Negligence is the legal term given to actions that breach the duty of care that one owes another according to the law. The court considered that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to Helen Palsgraf, and therefore no negligence was committed. The court found that the risk of the harm was unforeseeable. According to The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, “If the risk of harm is foreseeable, then the duty exists” (2014, pg.224). The court found that the actions which occurred were not only unforeseeable in to the objective observer, but also to Helen Palsgraf. This is to say that the risk was unforeseeable to an objective or reasonably subjective person in her position. The court found that the proximity of the plaintiff to the cause of action was irrelevant. Long Island Railroad actions or inactions caused no negligence to Helen Palsgraf. Even if there was negligence toward someone else, this is not a basis for a claim by Helen…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal causation, where the actions of D must be found to have caused the consequence, can be established as long as the ‘chain of causation’ (between the act and the consequence) has not been broken.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Manslaughter vs Murder

    • 3226 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In order to establish criminal liability, the external elements of that offence must be established. These external elements are known as the actus reus. After this has been proved, the mens rea must be proved in respect of each of those guilty elements. The actus reus and mens rea must occur at the same time, although the interpretation of this can vary with regards to the offence. There are three categories than an offence can fall into when examining the actus reus. The first is that there was a ‘voluntary act’, in which case the accused has voluntarily committed the act. The second possibility is known as ‘the state of affairs’. This simply requires that a state of affairs be present which causes the accused to have committed an offence. Offences arising in this manner are often ones of strict liability. An example of this is found in Lassonneur . Here, the police had brought a woman into the UK against her will, but she was found nonetheless to be an illegal alien. The final basis of liability is liability for failing to act in certain circumstances. There is no general duty to act, however there are a notable amount of specific circumstances where there is such a duty, as developed through the common law.…

    • 3226 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fault Element in Delict

    • 4298 Words
    • 18 Pages

    In the archaic legal orders, liability under the law of delict was independent of fault. Someone causing harm to property or personality of another was held liable, because experience taught that people, who commit certain harmful acts, as a rule, intend to cause harm. Over time, however, intent became an explicit requirement for all delictual liability. Negligence constituted liability only under the Aquilian action. However, as stated above, the principle that there should be no liability without negligence derives from Roman law. The requirement of fault is not usually found in more primitive legal systems, where a person is held liable for…

    • 4298 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trials of Dedan Kimathi

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages

    ← whether defendant should be held legally responsible for the damages factually caused by his conduct…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Past Exam Paper 2009-2010

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the main elements of negligence. Use case law for each of your main assertions.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vicarious Liability

    • 6124 Words
    • 25 Pages

    The object of this assignment is to explain the principle of vicarious liability and show which instances it applies to. Reference will be made to decided cases and statutes.…

    • 6124 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays