Preview

Quit India Movement

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2041 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Quit India Movement
Quit India Movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Quit india movement) Jump to: navigation, search

The Quit India Movement (Hindi: ???? ????? ??????? Bharat Chodo Andolan), or the August Movement (August Kranti) was a civil disobedience movement launched in India in August 1942 in response to Mohandas Gandhi's call for immediate independence. The All-India Congress Committee proclaimed a mass protest demanding what Gandhi called "an orderly British withdrawal" from India. The call for determined, but passive resistance appears in his call to Do or Die, issued on 8 August at the Gowalia Tank Maidan in Mumbai on year 1942.

The British were prepared to act. Almost the entire [INC] leadership, and not just at the national level, was imprisoned without trial within hours after Gandhi's speech—at least 60,000 people. Most spent the rest of the war in prison and out of contact with the masses. The British had the support of the Viceroy's Council (which had a majority of Indians), of the Muslims, the Communist Party, the princely states, the Imperial and state police, the Indian Army, and the Indian Civil Service. Many Indian businessmen were profiting from heavy wartime spending and did not support Quit India. Many militant students paid more attention to Subhas Chandra Bose, who was in exile and supporting the Axis. The only outside support came from the Americans, as President Franklin D. Roosevelt pressured Prime Minister Winston Churchill to give in to Indian demands. The Quit India campaign was effectively crushed.[1]

The British refused to grant immediate independence, saying it could happen only after the war ended.

Procession view at Bangalore
Sporadic small-scale violence took place around the country but the British arrested tens of thousands of leaders, keeping them imprisoned until 1945, and suppressed civil rights, freedom of speech and freedom of the press. In terms of immediate



References: [edit] Resolution for immediate independence The Congress Working Committee meeting at Wardha (14 July 1942) passed a resolution demanding complete independence from the British government

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although it resulted in thousands of Indian supporters being thrown in jail including Gandhi himself, in January of 1931, the government yielded. “Gandhi was released from custody in January 1931 and began negotiations with Lord Irwin aimed at ending the satyagraha campaign. A truce subsequently was declared, which was formalized in the Gandhi-Irwin pact that was signed on March 5” (Pletcher). This was a major victory for Indian independence and Gandhi would not stop until India was a free country. The victory was short lived as “Gandhi returned to India to find himself imprisoned once again in January 1932 during a crackdown by India’s new viceroy, Lord Willingdon”(Bio). Later that year, an imprisoned Gandhi once again showed the impact of non violent protest when he “embarked on a six-day fast to protest the British decision to segregate the ‘untouchables’ those on the lowest rung of India’s caste system, by allotting them separate electorates” (Bio). The public outcry forced the British to amend the proposal In 1934, Gandhi announced his retirement from politics, in order to concentrate his efforts on working within rural communities. This didn't last long as he was quickly Drawn back into the political fray by the outbreak of World War One. Gandhi quickly took control of the INC, and went right back to work demanding a British withdrawal from India in…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One view presented by the sources is that Indians did not like the British rule. The theme of hostility is presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 that the British are “evilly manned”, using strong words such as “dishonest” and “unscrupulous”, suggesting strong feelings of hostility towards British rule, as Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people “with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people”, meaning the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread because it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by a variety of people from all classes. This theme of hostility towards British is corroborated in Source 10 where the British are described as “irresponsible” and, like in Source 11, the Indians feel their “rights of human beings are being denied”, showing that the Indians again felt that the British were doing as they pleased without Indian voices being heard. However, as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was in fact widespread – Nehru only represents the INC which has the high caste community as a significant majority, and as it is written in 1919, we cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year as the massacre itself.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many politicians believing the British were civilising the peoples of periphery, the British probably believed the peoples of the American colonies needed to be taught to respect the metropole, which believed it had a parent role. In contrast, in the Indian case acts of resistance had yield some success. It could, however, be argued that the war a make factor in this success. As Fieldhouse points out: Stafford Cripps promised India dominion status ‘to rally Indian opinion in the crisis caused by Japan’s entry into the war’ (Secondary Source 19.2, 2015, p.10). As well as the civil disobedience, which was part of the ‘Quit India’ campaign, the British were also concerned about the Japanese-back ‘Indian National Army’ who had have some military success. In this context, then, the British high likely perceived those whom taken in the civil disobedience as moderates. As Indian support was needed to fight Japan, the British probably felt placating moderates was a small price to pay considering the circumstances. Therefore, the circumstances of war played in a major factor in Indian progress towards…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    stand out as an independent nation from Britain. From a request by Prime Minister Robert Borden, Britain…

    • 674 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Study Guide

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Declaration of Independence: announced that the colonies are no longer part of the British Empire…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi, Indian nationalist, and the man credited with liberating India from British rule led a campaign of non-violent, civil disobedience that made the continued stay in the country by the British colonizers politically and morally untenable. Imprisoned by the British for fomenting unrest, Gandhi confronted the colonizers’ force of arms with the power of his ideas, and the rightness of his cause, and by his act of courageous disobedience prevailed gloriously over the British in the end. Today, India is a vibrant democracy of 1.2 billion people, free because of the disobedience of one frail, unprepossessing man, Mahatma Gandhi.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The British were in control, but the people weren’t going to sit back and let it happen. This happened during the independence movement. This march began near the sea and the British monopoly on salt was one of the boldest act of civil disobedience yet against British rule in India. Gandhi would pray and speak his heart out to what was happening in his town. He wanted his followers to have some self-confidence to succeed in their struggle against the British.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Movie Gandhi Imperialism

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    were being passed and under the leadership of Gandhi, were being peacefully fought against. In…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the early twentieth century, India was a colony of Great Britain who used the region as a source of textiles and various other goods that could not be found in Europe. Great Britain gave the people of India very little say in political issues and had restricted rights. Naturally, the people of India did not like this and wanted their own country and government. However, Great Britain did not want to give up their prized colony. Gandhi believed the best way to fight against the oppressive British Government was to use peaceful protest. This way, there would not be violence and only protesters could be hurt. Through non-compliance and disobedience, the people of India hoped to make the British government realize that they were not welcome and that they would not be their loyal subjects anymore. As Gandhi himself put it, “But so long as there is yet life in these our bones, we will never comply with your arbitrary laws” (Applebee 377). Gandhi’s On Civil Disobedience was a clear message to the British crown that they would no longer be oppressed by their government and that they would not cease to resist their rule until they obtained their independence. Just like Thoreau, Gandhi believed that the best way to stand up to a government was to disobey that government in any way and to do whatever possible to do what is…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Imperialism

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mohandas Gandhi was the leader of civil disobedience in India. Before the independence movement in India began, India was a British Colony since the 1760s. Prior to British imperialism and colonialism in India, many Indians hand craft their tools and clothes for survival. Since the British took over most of India due to the British’s commercial interests in the region of India. The British East India Company defeated the Newab of Bengal which…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Indian Removal Act

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many were punished for speaking out against the government, which was prohibited as a part of these laws.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, non-violent protest is effective because it either allows the protesters greater control of their message, and even if meet with violent suppress from government, it still lowers the authority of the state. For example, in Indian Non Cooperation Movement led by Gandhi in 1920’s, it included surrender of titles, resignation from nominated seats in local government bodies, boycott of government educational institutions, law courts and foreign goods. In addition, from March 1930 to April 1934, Gandhi also called the Indian people to process the Civil Disobedience Movement, which was known as Salt Satyagraha. Through these decades-long nonviolent struggles, India won its independence in from the British Empire.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After World War I, many British colonies were ruling India, angering the natives and causing a sense of nationalism. Mahatma Gandhi took the matter into his own hands, using a surprising way to promote and fight for independence. Instead of being like many other revolutions and creating much…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article I read was titled, “Primary Sources: Gandhi’s WWII Letter to President Roosevelt and Reply”, by U.S National Archives. This article was about India’s leader of Independence Mahatma Gandhi, wrote a letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt during WWII. The article stated the following points in Gandhi's letter,“Please understand that it is as a friend that I offer this plan. Britain must immediately end its rule of India. This is the only way to turn the bad feelings toward Great Britain into good ones. It will allow millions of Indians to help the Allies in this war.” meaning that Gandhi was offering a deal in which they offered to join them as allies in the war, but they could not do so because they were under British rule, in…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays