Preview

Prince vs Philosopher King

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
284 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prince vs Philosopher King
Question: Compare and contrast two rulers; Plato’s "Philosopher Kings" and Machiavelli’s “Prince" in terms of their understanding of goodness of their citizens and their character. Who would you support more? Why? Think of specific areas of comparison and introduce them in a table of at least five lines with their referencing chapter numbers. Refer to Plato’s Republic, Books IV and VII and Machiavelli’s The Prince, Chapters from 15 to 23.

Step 1 * Explaining the basic concepts of Philosopher Kings and Machiavelli Prince. Explaining the differences between Philosopher Kings and Machiavelli’s Prince.
Key words: Citizens, Prince, Rulers, Philosopher Kings

Step 2 * Understanding of goodness of Philosopher Kings and Machiavelli’s Prince citizens and their characters and also essay question asks about two distinctive types of rulers so comparison of the two sides in terms of types of rule. Two different views exist between Plato and Machiavelli, both having different ideas on virtues, structure of government, and role of populace.

Step 3 * Basic concepts of Philosopher kings; explaining philosopher king’s type of rule. Main virtues of philosopher king and structure of government.
Key words: Guardians, auxiliaries, wisdom, moderation, justice

* Basic concepts of Machiavelli Prince; Machiavelli’s principality is formed by the ruler at the top, and then comes the elites and the populace.
Key words: Populace, elites, army.

Thesis: There are some differences between Philosopher king and Machiavelli’s Prince in terms of ruling the society and citizenship. Both have some good sides and bad sides both view depends on virtues and wisdom, however, Plato’s philosopher king concept is much more rational than Prince because Plato’s concept is better than Prince in terms of goodness and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper

    Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to creating and holding on to a principality. In it, he also characterizes a "good" society and the necessary tools for building one. Although Machiavelli conceives the republic as being the most practical form of government, he reasons that it is still possible to create a good society under a monarchy, as long as the leader of the monarchy follows the stipulated guidelines. Machiavelli realized that humans are predisposed to act perniciously and therefore it is the responsibility of the prince to exploit that nature in a way that will benefit society as a whole. In this way, Machiavelli's prince is an ideal crafted from the actual, rather than an actual crafted from the ideal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli

    Essay #15 Machiavelli believed that a leader should possess the ability to heroically and decisively for the good of their country. Machiavelli’s suggestion that a ruler should be like a lion and a fox was fairly true in Europe. Machiavelli uses a lion in comparison to a ruler because he thought a king should be strong and maintain an honest image. He also uses a fox as a symbol to show how a ruler is deceitful.Catherine the Great of Russia and Elizabeth I of England were both like a lion and a fox through their way of handling problems that they confronted during their reign. Elizabeth I of England and Catherine the Great of Russia were both good rulers who had policies against peasants/serfs, foreign countries,and religion. Catherine the Great of Russia had a strong army as well as Elizabeth I of England only difference was that Elizabeth I of England tried to avoid war but secretly encouraged Francis Drake to destroy Spanish fleets. Catherine the Great of Russia used her wisdom to decide when to use her powers to benefit Russia.Catherine the Great of Russia was like a lion because she suppressed the revolt of serfs which made her look strong. Peasants serfs tried to revolt but were not successful due to Catherine the Great of Russia. Another thing that made Catherine very powerful was the Russian military. She gained a large portion of Poland by leaving conquered Danubian area. Catherine the Great of Russia was like a fox because she controlled the nobles. She had earned the nobles loyalty by giving them control of the serfs. Thanks to the support of the nobles Catherine the…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Prince/Man of All Seasons: Ethics
    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Prince/Man of All Seasons: Ethics

    In his book The Prince, Machiavelli presents a theory asserting that man needs a powerful leader in order to be successful. Machiavelli felt that a Prince must act in a way that guaranteed stability and order. However, his emphasis on political convenience was not in the service of the individual power of a Prince, but in allowing that Prince to do what was necessary for the sake of the people. He argues that as a leader, one has the duty to be dishonest or otherwise deceive its people in times of need. This is further clarified when he addresses the question of whether it is better to be feared or loved.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exemplifies Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Exemplifies Machiavelli's The Prince

    In this paper, I will argue that a ruler must do all in his or hers power to not be at a disadvantage. As being an elitist in society, one must always be ‘beast-like’. Having a disadvantage will put them in a situation to not reach their self-interests. The powerful must use any strategy to be authoritative. There are many present day situations that exemplifies Machiavelli’s points in The Prince.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Virtue And Fortune In Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Virtue And Fortune In Machiavelli's The Prince

    Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli outlines the characteristics needed to be a strong and admirable leader. He explains that personal characteristics such as courage and compassion, both being aspects of virtue, will earn him praise. However, he feels that this expectation is unrealistic and a prince’s first job is to protect the state, and having “bad” characteristics is sometimes necessary to reach that goal. That being said, in order to protect the state a prince may have to act unscrupulously at times which he believes will bring good fortune in the long run. Machiavelli believes that no matter how a prince acts, whether moral or not, virtue and fortune are the two most influential forces in politics and he shows how, throughout history, they have affected different people in powerful positions. Using the lessons learned by previous people of great political power, Machiavelli points out virtues and fortunes present in the particular cases, while then explaining his beliefs and solutions to the examples from the past. Virtue and fortune go hand in hand throughout this guide. One…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Best Paper Evvver
    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Best Paper Evvver

    4) Why does Machiavelli say that it is better for a prince “to be both loved and feared”? Is it possible for a prince to be both? Explain.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership
    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership

    Machiavelli, N. (2013). The prince. In J. T. Wren (Ed.), Companion: insights on leadership through the ages [Kindle Edition], New York: The Free Press.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    Is a just person the best choice for a ruler; many philosophers have laid out different ways in which they believe a society should be ran whether it be a single ruler such as a prince or multiple rulers like philosophy kings. Machiavelli intended for a society/principality to be ruled a strong ruler whether he be just or unjust, moral or immoral; whereas Plato believed for a society to work a just ruler such as the philosopher kings along with its other social counterparts was the perfect society. This paper intends to show how a just ruler was not something Machiavelli saw as pertinent to a society's survival whereas Plato deemed it to be at necessary for order and efficiency and for a city to work.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Is Hamlet A Good Leader
    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Is Hamlet A Good Leader

    Machiavelli’s text, The Prince, includes a list of traits that he thought a Prince should possess. An…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher King
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosopher King

    Why should he be compelled to rule – because a true philosopher will love the pursuit of truth, will be indifferent to the pleasures of the body, will not be interested in money, will not think human life is anything of great importance, and will not be concerned with dying…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How a Ruler Ought to Govern His State
    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How a Ruler Ought to Govern His State

    In this letter, Petrarch offers advice on how to rule as an effective leader. He uses various examples and sources to support his theories of how a good ruler should rule by laying out a good model. Petrarch emphasizes the first quality of a good leader should be friendly to the good citizens. He believed that nothing was worse for the state than to use fear and cruelty to maintain power. He used the case of the barbaric emperor by the name of Maxminus, claiming that it is far better for a lord to be loved than to be feared. He also advised the ruler to love the subjects like one’s own children. Next, Petrarch emphasized justice so that each person gets what is due, and no one is punished without a good reason.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Prince
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Prince

    4. How does Machiavelli’s advice concerning the prince’s conduct in chapters 15-19 conflict with the advice previous writers would have given?…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    St. Augustine vs. Machiavelli: a Comparison of the Good Society
    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages

    St. Augustine vs. Machiavelli: a Comparison of the Good Society

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics