Preview

Politcal Philosophy Notes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Politcal Philosophy Notes
SECTION 1: POLITICAL ORGANISATION

-Human Nature/State of Nature -
THOMAS HOBBES has a pessimistic view of human nature; “the war of all against all.” * In order to achieve felicity, one must become powerful. Power is the means to secure goods now and in the future. Since we will all, forever be wanting goods, the quest for power is a competitive one. * All humans, by virtue of their individual strengths and weaknesses have a more or less equal ability to kill each other. * This dismal trifecta of equality, uncertainty, and scarcity make the state of nature a perpetual state of war. * The only law in the state of nature, HOBBES says, is that anybody may do whatever they like, if it is in their own interest. * Criticism: We are surely not as cruel and selfish as HOBBES believes us to be. * Response: HOBBES agrees that we are not, but, in a state of nature, pre-emptive strikes and threat of attack would make us become overly fearful, this could lead humans to attack not for personal gain but for future security. * In this state of nature, humans put aside what is collectively rational and collectively interested (i.e. being peaceful with each other) to pursue instead what is individually rational and self interested. * The essence of the state is submission to this collective rationality, being coerced into following the law in order to preserve society for all.
JOHN LOCKE’S state of nature is very different; he calls his a state of “peace, good will, mutual assistance, and preservation”. * LOCKE asserts first that all humans are born free and equal. Nobody has a natural right to subordinate another human. * He then argues that we rationally, or theologically, arrive at a law of nature which gives each human a right to life, liberty and property. * In the state of nature we have a duty to respect these rights because it is what is good for mankind. * LOCKE’S state of nature then is a “state of liberty, not a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, an Enlightenment philosopher, claimed that mankind is naturally evil and selfish and will cause conflicts “if any two men desire the same thing, which they nevertheless cannot both enjoy” or have differing opinions, in order to gain more power so that they can freely pursue their selfish desires, especially “during the time men live without a common power” and “in that condition which is called war, every man against every man,” and are therefore incapable of self-governing. Hobbes’ position on human nature is easily observable; intolerance and bigotry causes violence and general public…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to John Locke's State of Nature, he believed human being was born to have some certain right. One of them is a state of freedom; he said that all man were naturally in state of perfect freedom to order their action and disposed of their possessions and persons as they thought without any bounds of the law of nature or depending upon the will of any other man. It means that individuals have freedom on life and making decision. Equality is the second state which all man was equal with natural right that no king or other man had power to voice because each individual was born equally with " all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties." He also argued “Men living according to reason, without a common superior on earth, to judge between them, are property the state of nature."(Two Treaties 2.19). Although all man has freedom to do their wants, they cannot harm or use on other people because of their profits. It is called a state of liberty. Locke defended “the state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one; and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that, being all equal and independent, no…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Locke, for a rational man, the reason why man is willing to surrender their rights, though man has right to do anything without being affected by the will of others within the law of nature in the state of nature is the uncertainty of his preservation. The enjoyment is unsafe. Because man is partial to his own interest and is lacking awareness of the law of nature ‘That being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions’ (Chapter 2, Section 6) and there are probably continual invasions of others. As a result of this, there are three…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of the natural human is a topic discussed for centuries. Philosophers for generations asked question regarding the form of government that human beings react best in. In class we examined both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's theory of the State of Nature which allowed us to see their viewpoints on humankind. Hobbes believes that humans are selfishly motivated and are constantly at war with one another. However, Locke has a more positive outlook. He believes that humans behaved based on the Law of Nature which is given to us by God (hobbeslockedocument). In Locke’s opinion, the State of Nature is free and has the right to life, liberty and property and if people want their rights respected, they should respect others. However, Locke is not delusional, he knows…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through reason a “Law of Nature” can be discovered. A law of nature is unlike a civil law because a law of nature is inherently known to all. Hobbes deduces that the only way to escape the terror is to seek peace and so the first law of nature was created. The first and most fundamental law is “to seek peace and follow it” (Hobbes 80). In seeking peace, humans will fulfill the natural right to defend themselves. Additionally, humans must give up certain rights to escape the natural condition of humanity. By giving up their rights, they are agreeing to a social contract. This social contract leads to self-preservation and peace. Hobbes created nineteen laws of nature and the basis for them all is to treat others the way you want to be treated. Hobbes believes that by following these laws and the social contract, humans can escape the natural condition of…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hobbes credits to each person in the state of nature a liberty right to preserve herself, which he terms “the right of nature”. This is the right to do whatsoever one sincerely judges requiring for one's protection; yet because it is at least possible that virtually anything might be judged necessary for one's protection, this hypothetically limited right of nature becomes in practice an unlimited right to potentially anything, or, as Hobbes puts it, a right “to all things”. Hobbes further assumes that people should accept what they see to be the necessary means to their most important ends.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke wrote the Second Treatise of Government with the perception that all men are radical. Locke used a philosophical approach in his writing to conclude that all humans are naturally good. He believed that it was possible for man to live between two states, the state of nature and the state of war. Because he perceived man to be naturally good he stated that man would consequently live in that state of nature, “a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and persons as they see fit,” (Locke 2). Therefore, the state of nature is one where man is left to rule oneself and all men are equal. Locke…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Locke’s’ piece, Of the State of Nature Chapter II, he emphasizes the positive views of human nature. Locke supports a no-government form of rule. He believes that man can rise above injustice and keep a fully functioning society without rule or as he puts it they can have “A State of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit…..” (Locke). If you give man the freedom to make his own decisions and choices he will make the correct ones. Freedom of choice is what is needed to keep a society intact and functioning, individuals in a society need to feel as if they are in charge of their own destiny. The natural rights of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness are backed up by the notion of freedom and choice of…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In actual fact we are very unlikely to experience a state of nature in our lifetime, so the most we can do is to just imagine. In support of Hobbes’s view, no one, no police would be there to stop us from doing whatever it takes to experience total happiness. For example, if we desperately needed money, no one could stop us from committing fraud or robbing a bank in order to get what we want. However, it may work when we think about it in our own perspective, but imagine what you would do in a state of nature, and times it by 7 billion. The imagery you now have in your head is most likely chaotic and out of control. This is the exact reason why Hobbes was so against a state of nature. In Hobbes’s most famous piece of work, ‘the leviathan’, he wrote that in a man’s natural state, “the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short...The condition of man...is a condition of war of everyone against everyone.” This leads us to believe that life in a state of nature, with no rules, morality…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hobbes and kant

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes was a different kind of philosopher that had a very pessimistic view on humanity. In Hobbes’ book the Leviathan, he believed that humans were naturally nasty creatures and needed to be regulated in a society. For Hobbes one thing he also believed in was Utilitarianism, which is the desire for pleasure that drives our actions, basically, the most useful choice for your benefit. Hobbes had a theory that was called “the state of nature”, which in the eyes of Hobbes was life for humans before any kind of laws or governments. He says that the state of nature is a violent place with no lows. In the state of nature there is no business, no account of time, buildings, and there is always danger around the corner. For Hobbes the “state of nature” was a savage place that could only be fixed by laws, there is only peace when there is no war and no war is a place with laws. Hobbes came to the conclusion that humans cant live in groups without law. Hobbes was…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First Law of nature: "That every man, ought to endeavour Peace, as farre as he can hope of obtaining it; and when he cannot obtain it, that he may seek, and use, all helps and advantages of Warre. The first branch of which Rule, containeth the first, and Fundamental Law of Nature; which is, to seek Peace, and follow it. The Second, the summe of the Right of Nature of Nature; which is, By all means we can, to defend our selves."…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Do you agree with the Hobbesian position that "the state of nature is a state of war of all against all"?…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    02 01 02 A

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is the idea that people agree or consent to government protects the people and their rights.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays