• LIABILITY – Each partner assumes unlimited liability for the debts of the business and can be held totally responsible for debts and malpractice committed by any of the partners.…
Liability – There is unlimited liability in a general partnership. The owners/partners are responsible for all profits and losses. If one partner is unable to pay a debt the other partners will be accountable to pay.…
Control- Any partner can make decisions for all partners; if one partner enters into a contract with a third party, the entire partnership is liable for any and all promises made and is responsible for seeing the contract through.…
A partner may pursue his or her own interests without automatically violating the partner’s fiduciary duties to the partnership and the other partners.…
Agency relationship exists between partners as stated under section 5 – a partner has the power to bind the other partners when acting within the normal scope and authortiy of the business. That is, innocent partners may still be liable for the actions of a partner who may have acted in breach of the partnership. Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v Garrod 1962. Disadvantage (D)…
Bradley, as a co-owner and resident with Adam, applies for a loan of £200,000 for a business unit on the residence. To receive this loan from Large PLC, Bradley signs a contract that uses the house as collateral. Due to the failure of the business, Large PLC seeks to obtain the house on its terms. Bradley can defend his home from Large PLC by relying on undue influence, misrepresentation by Carlotta, equitable doctrine of unconscionable bargains, and statutory consumer protection.…
The relationship established between two parties for lawful purposes, in which one party, named the principal, requests the other party or agent to represent him is called Agency. Agency relationships create fiduciary duties between the principal and the agent (Kubasek et al., 2012). In this paper, Team B will discuss the different types of Agency and the legal consideration surrounding each of them.…
* Mutual agency – every partner is a mutual agent in the firm, any partner can bind the business to a contract within the scope of its operations.…
Question 1: Describe the meaning of the term ‘Agency’ and identify the types of agency relationships that a real estate agent may enter into.…
* There are two types of authority that an agent of a company might have:…
This case comes under Law of Agency. Agency law is concerned with any principal, agent and third party relationship. A relationship in…
Various issues in the common law arise when agents make contracts on behalf of principals. Should a principal be bound when his agent makes a contract on his behalf that he would immediately wish to disavow? The tradeoffs resemble those in tort, so the least-cost avoider principle is useful for deciding which agreements are binding and can unify a number of different doctrines in agency law. In particular, an efficiency explanation can be found for the undisclosed-principal rule, under which the agent's agreement binds the principal even when the third party with whom the contract is made is unaware that the agent is acting as an agent. Agency deals with situations in which one person -- the principal-- uses another person -- the agent-- to act on his behalf. Sometimes the acts of the agent are attributed legally to the principal, sometimes not. Clearly, agency is central to business dealings.…
•LIABILITY-Each partner is liable for all debts of the company to include any contracts entered into by other partners.…
| The agency problem arises when interests and behaviours of parties to a transaction are not consistent with each other.…
The particular consequences to consider are the changes in behaviour of the partners and the third parties who conduct business with the partnership. In the context of the absence of vicarious liability, third parties who knowingly deal with individual partners would have increased motives to investigate the said partner’s reputation for competence and probity and their monetary ability to compensate the third parties incurred losses. In addition, the third parties would also have increased motives to insure themselves against losses – including the risk of involuntary or unknowingly becoming the creditor of a judgment-proof person. These incentives, in general, are present otherwise, but to a lesser degree as vicarious liability of the principal, would hold the partnership liable. Subsequently, since the partnership would be held vicariously liable, the partners would have reduced motives to monitor other partners – since individual assets were no longer at risk. The monitoring of partners costs resources and additional expenditure, thus, reduced monitoring would result in saving costs associated with…