Preview

Milgram Study Review

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milgram Study Review
Behavioral Study of Obedience by Milgram (1963)
Background:
Some type of authority is necessary when humans live together and obedience is currently a very relevant concept. Throughout World War II, millions of people were killed through gas chambers and death camps. Although there was a mastermind behind the plan, there needed to be a huge amount of people to carry out the deeds. Some think that this is an ingrained behavior that can override ethical values, sympathy, and morality. Obedience should not always be thought of in relation to violence against others as there are several productive functions to it. This is seen by its role in society as being necessary.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to assess the level of destructive obedience in a laboratory setting.
Procedure:
Subjects were given roles in which they were to be the teacher in an experiment. An actor was used to play the student and subjects were told that each wrong answer would require them to give the student an electric shock. The 30 levels were marked from 15 volts to 450 volts which were labeled from Slight Shock to Danger: Severe Shock. Some internal resistance is made as they near 450 volts, and will often refuse to continue with the experiment. This occurred when there was a negative or fearful response from the student, acting as though in pain. If asked whether or not they should stop, the instructor will explain that it is “necessary to the experiment that they continue.” The questions that the student was asked were in reference to a list of word pairs originally given that the student later had to match up. The subjects included 40 males from ages 20 to 50. They were obtained from an advertisement in the newspaper and were part of a large range of occupations.
Results:
Psychologists were to predict the results before the experiment took place. They thought that less than 3% would continue to the end of the experiment. However, 66% of the participants continued to the end,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two groups of subjects were told they were going to receive electric shocks as part of a learning experiment. One group was told that the shocks would be relatively painful. The other group was told that the shocks would be mild and produce a “tickling sensation.” The subjects were then asked if they wished to wait individually or with a group while the shock machinery was being set up.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A well known study into obedience is the Milgram experiment, Milgram had a found interest in why during the Second World War hundreds of people obeyed the orders of others in authority. Millions of innocent people were killed on command. He wanted to test out this potential destructive obedience in a laboratory. Each participant out…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s infamous 1963 study into the nature of obedience is often portrayed in the media as strong evidence for an innate human predisposition to obedience, “resistance is futile” (Parker, 2007) when it comes to the human condition to obey – even in a “destructive” (Milgram, 1963) sense. As Milgram (1963) himself states, obedience as a concept is one of the most fundamental aspects of society, and much has frequently been made of drawing parallels with the atrocities carried out by the Third Reich and the data produced by Milgram’s obedience studies [most notably the dramatic results of the baseline study (Haslam, 2012)]. The ideation is frequently asserted that Nazis themselves were displaying blind obedience (Debattista, 2012) to their superiors, and this blind obedience is what is captured in Milgram’s 1963 experiment, although this proposition must be questioned in lieu of a scientific analysis of Milgram’s actual works,…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The teacher is to give a pair of words to the learner, then the teacher is to repeat the first word and the learner is to repeat the second word that matches from the list of choice the teacher gives. For every question the learner answers incorrectly, he is to receive a “mild” electric shock, starting from 15 volts and increased by 15 per wrong answer up a maximum shock of 450 volts. The teachers did not know that there were no shocks and the procedure was perfectly safe. For every time a participant would refuse to continue on with the experiment, the scientist would give four different orders every time. The first order is “please continue,” the second is “the experiment requires you to continue,” the third is “it is absolutely essential that you continue,” and the last is “you have no other choice but to continue” (McLeod,…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Respondents were being informed that the experiment would analyze how being punished could have an effect on learning aptitude. Three individuals would be involved in the experiment, one person who would be the “experimenter”, one person who would be the “teacher” and one person who would be the “learner.” The experimenter was in charge of the entire experiment, giving orders to the teacher when they were hesitant to perform their duties, and would continuously remind the teacher that they must continue the trial, even when they began to feel uncomfortable with their part in the experiment. The role of experimenter would be filled by someone who was completely aware of the experiment, and would try their best to keep the experiment going for as long as they could. The teacher was meant to listen and obey the rules of the experimenter and deliver unpleasant stimuli to the learner when ordered to by the experimenter. The learner was supposed to memorize word pairings and then answer questions about these word pairings to the best of…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding these concepts is essential to humankind based on the fact that if we could control these factors we could make decisions based solely on what is right and wrong, and not who tells a subject what to do. Obedience to authority has a vast variety of pros and cons. Whether it be from the psychological stress that the people being ordered are put under, or a structured society that runs smooth because of the people willing to follow any commands. Obedience to authority has been a part of every society since the beginning of time, whether it continues in our future depends on each individual and how they view the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assessing Obedience

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obedience is a characteristic ingrained in every person. No matter who a person is, there is always a more authoritative figure that they must obey to. Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted experiments that tested obedience towards authority. These experiments were conducted in 1963 at Yale University. The experiments Milgram performed gained many different reactions from people. Two authors that wrote their thoughts on the experiments done by Milgram are Diana Baumrind and Richard Herrnstein. Diana Baumrind, who wrote the “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes that the experiments Milgram conducted were not necessary and should not have been conducted unless the subject knew the harms that could occur after the experiment was done. Baumrind is a psychologist, who was employed at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, Berkley at the time that Milgram’s experiment was performed. Richard Herrnstein has a different belief. Herrnstein, the author of the article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes Milgram’s experiments were well done and show great potential of what we are able to do in the future. Milgram’s experiment is valid because it was conducted in an appropriate setting, there was minimal psychological harm done, and it contained valuable results.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The real participant was taken to an adjacent room where he was unable to see the ‘learner’ and could only hear him. Every time the ‘learner’ answered incorrectly, the participant was instructed by the experimenter to deliver the next highest electric shock, starting with 15 volts. At 75 volts the participant heard the ‘learner’ vaguely react, at 120 volts the learner protested again with more assertion, at 150 volts the learner was distressed and asking to be let out, at 270 volts he started screaming in agony, and after 345 volts the learner became silent. If the participant hesitated or objected to giving a shock, the experimenter used prods including, “The experiment requires you to continue.”, “It is absolutely essential that you continue.” or “You have no other choice, you must go on.” Unknown to the participants, no electric shocks were given and the…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conformity and Obedience

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform, also with explanations of minority influence. Whilst seeking to understand the reasons why people obey authority, it will show an evaluation of Milgram’s study of obedience, discussing the ethical issues raised from the research and assessing whether the knowledge gained about human behaviour justifies Milgram’s experiments.…

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blind obedience is when a person carries out an order even if it goes against their moral values or codes. Prejudice is an unjust attitude towards an individual solely based on their membership of a social group. Both of these issues were present in Abu Ghraib Prison (Iraq). They occurred when American soldiers commit terrible act upon Iraqi prisoners staying there. The soldiers claimed they were merely following orders, but scepticisms have been made about whether it was blind obedience or prejudice that made them commit the acts. There are 2 main theories that help to explain what blind obedience and prejudice are, and why they occur.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5.|Students who were told that a young woman had been instructed to act in a very unfriendly way for the purposes of the experiment concluded that her behavior:|…

    • 6548 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Visible Status - seeing authority (cops in uniforms or teachers having a larger desk in grade school or professors speaking on a stage like set up)…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378. doi:10.1037/h0040525.…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays