Preview

Midterm 3 History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Midterm 3 History
There were 3 questions that I did not have the answer to. I’ve highlighted them in yellow. I apologize for the formatting, but the copy and paste job from Microsoft Word kinda screwed up. Feel free to format to your hearts content. Cheers!

CC 302/CTI 310: Midterm Exam Short Answer Questions
· What was the position of the tribunes on the escalating conflict between Caesar, Pompey and the senate? What was Cicero’s position? o The tribunes were advocating for compromise with Caesar by offering him legal protection and military power. o Cicero was supporting the senate and Pompey and was in Rome stirring up trouble for the first Triumvirate by speaking out of ending Caesar’s Gallic command to prosecute him for his injustices during consulship.
· Describe Caesar’s treatment of the Gauls during his campaigns? How does this contrast with his treatment of Italian cities and citizens in 49 BC? Significance of Caesar crossing the Rubicon? o Caesar committed genocide against millions of Gauls during his campaign and enslaved another million. He also looted spoils of war during his campaign. o In contrast with his treatment of the Italian cities and citizens in 49 BC, he does not execute anyone, he releases captives, and he takes no money from the state to fund his march on Rome. o When Caesar crossed the Rubicon, he passed the point of no return. By doing so he formally relinquished his command in Gaul (he had no authority to do so) and ultimately commits himself to marching on Rome and engaging in Civil War (Alea Iacta Est: “the die is cast”).
· Pompey’s reaction to news that Caesar was marching south? What rhetoric did Pompey and the senate use to describe Caesar’s actions? How did Caesar respond/justify his actions? o Pompey’s reaction to Caesar’s march south was to travel East to Greece to rally up troops and support to combat Caesar and retake Italy. o Pompey and the senate claimed that Caesar was a tyrant and they had the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He had given command of the cavalry to Labienus, the former commander of Caesar's favorite X legion. He deployed the rest of the army on his left together with his auxiliary troops. Pompey's plan was to allow Caesar's infantry to advance, have his cavalry attack and push back the numerically inferior Julian horses, and then attack Caesar's infantry from behind. Pompey had disclosed his battle plans to companions days before the battle, and Caesar became aware of them.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death of Jlius Casear

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the same year he obtained the consulate of Gaul, which he subdued almost all, destroying forever a historical enemy. That made him gain a great popularity, but he wasn’t seen well at conservators’ eyes. The conservators, guided by Marco Procio Catone, wanted to exile him for betrayal because not all the war he declared in Gaul had been authorized by the senate. At the end of Gaul wars, Caesar asked to ratify all his victories. The senate instead, ordered Caesar to renounce to his position and to come back to Rome as a private citizen, to be processed. Caesar rebelled and with his army he went through the Rubicon river pronouncing the sentence “alea iacta est” or rather “ the die has been cast” that was to symbolize that he could not come back anymore.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The aim of this essay is to discuss whether the death of Julius Caesar by acquaintances Marcus Brutus and Cassius Longius was due to political or personal motives. The focus will lay in understanding Rome’s political situation at the time, evaluating Caesar’s policies and the possible explanations resulting in Caesar’s assassination. The essay will begin by explaining the political situation in Rome at the time in order to understand the tensions between Caesar and the Senate. The concluding part of the investigation…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cicero and Caesar wanted an alliance with Pompey but instead Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus formed an alliance. Over time Caesar proposed a law that gave lands to veteran soldiers of Pompey and poor…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1020 Ch

    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9. Who did Rome fight in the Punic Wars? (What was the name of their enemy?)…

    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius was not selfish in any way. During his reign he helped many find homes, with taxes, and many more. Miola and Bloom stated “ His generosity United all Romans as familial Lagatees, and though he shows superbial , he places self last and others first” ( Miola and Bloom 1). Julius showed qualities that a good leader should always have. All in all, the assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader. Although others believe that he wa a tyrant, they were still…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jc Studyguide

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    11. At the end of Act III, are the citizens of Rome on Brutus’ or Antony’s side?…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. To which event in act 4 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar does this statement refer?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Alea iacta est”. With those words Julius Caesar crossed the River Rubicon in northern Italy and forever changed the history of the world. Rolling the die was exactly what Caesar was doing when he decided to challenge the authority of the Roman Republic that until now he had served. While it is easy to give specific dates as to when the government shifted to Caesar’s ‘Dictator for Life’ role, as well as for when his nephew Octavian (Augustus) received his new name and new titles of Caesar/Emperor of Rome, Princeps, and others. These are often seen as the death roughs of the Roman Republic, as if the republic had been strong and united and that out of nowhere it suddenly came to an end.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    62 BC - to Pompey in Asia Minor (Rome, summer): evidence for obsequious behaviour - 'I rely on you so completely'; reference to their political amisitia - 'join you as a friend as well as an ally'; reference to the Catilinarian Conspiracy ((CC) 63 BC) - 'I have done the right thing', 'national interest', 'I have achieved things'; seeks approval of his Concordia Ordinum - 'soldier and statesmen'.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Struggles

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antony’s rule of rome soon became challenged, by Caesar’s nephew Octavius. Octavius was a more experienced in military altercations and with ruling from a legislative standpoint. He claimed the money of Caesar as the rightful heir, but Antony spent it “in the interest of the roman people” which did not include giving the roman people a cut of the money. This caused many of the people to rally against antony in favor of Octavius. Another challenger to Antony’s authority was Cicero. Cicero won the philippics against Antony, which is essentially a war of words. This led to the prevention of Antony joining forces with Octavius. Even with the present challenges, the system of government remained the same and a second Triumvirate was formed to take the place of the…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, there were those who were afraid that he would use his army of loyal veterans to take power for himself. Pompey was a hero of Rome upon his return and lacked the political desire to seize the throne of a despot. Upon returning to Rome he disbanded his army, refusing to use it to make himself an absolute ruler. Cicero dreamt of forging a strong alliance of himself serving as the wise philosopher advisor and Pompey as the popular general and leader. He laid great praise upon Pompey: “Pompey made his preparations for the war at the end of winter, entered upon it at the commencement of spring, and finished it in the middle of the summer.”[5] During his time as consul, before Pompey’s return, he made Pompey’s political interests his own because he believed Pompey was the just ruler he had been looking…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar Timeline

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    |supported Pompey, attempt to |Caesar returns and mentions to Antony his |allowed to continue to rule, and when Cinna|…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus the betrayer

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Let's kill him boldly, but not wrathfully; Let's carve him as a dish fit for the gods, Not hew him as a carcass fit for hounds.”-Brutus…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays