Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Meg -5 Solved

Good Essays
994 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meg -5 Solved
Q2: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Wordsworth_or_Coleridge_have_greater_influence_on_modern_criticism

Q3: New Criticism is a form of literary criticism that triumphed as the predominant critical form in the 1940s through the 1960s. John Crowe Ransom is responsible for naming it in his book of the same name, published in 1941. It quickly became “the” way to read literature and poetry, and was taught in both college and high schools. The underlying idea is that the intent of the author is not important; the text itself is all that should be examined.
Literary criticism prior to this form had considered a number of ways to interpret literature, with no consensus as to the best method. Some critics evaluated literature in terms of the author’s history, showing how works were representative or differed from the time periods in which they were written. Others evaluated works in terms of the author’s life and background.
New Criticism differed greatly from previous forms as it dismissed authorial intent, and particularly ignored biographical and historical information about an author. Instead, literature was to be interpreted based solely on the cohesiveness of the work. To a New Critic, whatever the author intended was not relevant, as the form of the work always transformed intent, producing new meanings. The critic’s position was to evaluate various aspects of a text that produced ambiguity. He or she analyzed metaphor, simile, and other rhetorical tropes that resulted in stress and counterstress, reconciling them to find the harmony in a work. Through analysis, the critic could then tell readers how to interpret a text and what value was to be gained from reading a text. In other words, the critic became the interpreter through which literature could be understood.
Additionally, the text had to be considered as an object of literature, complete within itself. If the reader began to extrapolate to his or her interpretation outside of the text, he or she had strayed from New Criticism. The critic should be free from his or her own feelings or emotional response when reading the text, and only criticism that stuck to the text was of value. Later theorists argued that there can be no freedom from the self in textual analysis, and that this desire to analyze text as if the reader were a blank slate is quite impossible.
In their new elevated status as interpreter, however, critics legitimized their own profession. Publication of books and articles that clarified the meanings of poetry and other writings were cousins to literature, because they provided the layperson with a method for understanding what he or she read. Though much of New Criticism has been soundly refuted, this new, enhanced status of the critic remains.
This form of criticism influenced the literary canon, the materials considered to be art, because critics could point to those works that achieved harmony through ambiguity. As such, certain works were considered more valuable than others, greatly influencing which ones were assigned as reading material. Students writing about such material often had their interpretations scrapped because they had failed to find the “correct” interpretation of a text.
While New Criticism remains a useful tool for teaching students about the basic elements in poetry, most of it has been refuted and replaced. Newer forms of literary criticism, which often posit that texts can produce multiple meanings that are directly opposed, have triumphed. These theories have reintroduced the consideration of the author’s intent from a psychological or historical point of view. Other critical schools, such as structuralism, evaluate the specific language of the text to derive multiple meanings.
The best refutations have led to inclusion of more works in the canon. New Critics tended to value Western work over any other forms of literature, and moreover, placed a higher value on works written by men. Feminist and New Historical Critics have restored many works to the canon that had been ousted by New Critics.

http://www.slideshare.net/mehdi_hassanian/new-criticism

New Critics: Their Contribution

The New Critics have done valuable work and made considerable contribution to literary criticism. Summing up their contribution to literary criticism Pritchard writes, "Their concentration upon linguistic expression has benefited the study of poetry. Readers needed to realize that 'the poem's the thing.' By this redirection of poetic study and by the publicity they have given to poetic problems, they have increased the number of readers of poetry. Even their too sweeping assertions, by stirring opponents to combat them, have injected new life into the study of literature. The self-evaluation of the New Critics during the past seven years, and the indications that they are increasingly ready to widen their study, are encouraging signs. Whether this expansion indicates their further development or their disappearance as a school, no one can say. They remain, however, one of the most important and colorful schools of criticism which the century has yet produced."

Q4: http://massthink.wordpress.com/2007/06/03/the-signifier-the-signified-and-the-sign/
Q5: Post modernism contribute to the logic of disintegration due to the rise in trade between the merchants. Post modernism leads to new type of relations which is a cause off disintegration.
Deconstruction theories like Postmodernism and Poststructuralism represent the "logics of disintegration" because they believe that the structural understandings of truth are fundamentally flawed. For the Poststructuralist thinker, the "structure" against which they argue is a language based one in which binary oppositions are used to determine structure and meaning. Poststructuralist thinkers seek to critique the supposed establishment of truth and order. It is this deconstruction that feeds the Postmodern thinker, in general. The basic "logic of disintegration" is the idea of this critique. There can be no extenuating order seen as "truth" or "transcendent" for the Postmodern thinker. The Derrida idea of "Reading is transformational" fits into this context. This transformational element indicates something that is in flux, in constant definition and redefinition. It makes order impossible, contributing to the belief in the logics of disintegration.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    interpretations of a work of literature. Students use specific details from the work of literature and two…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because this is a short paper focusing on your application of a particular theory, you do not need to incorporate any outside research into your argument; you should, however, use this assignment as a stepping-stone toward your literary analysis paper by offering an abbreviated version of your (tentative) thesis statement and argument.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Draper, James P., ed. World Literature Criticism. Vol. 6, 1500 To The Present ed. Detroit: 1992. Gale Research Inc., 15 Nov. 2006…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A second influence was O’Connor’s intense exposure to the predominant literary style, New Criticism, which was at its apex during the middle of the twentieth century. New Criticism was a complicated formulaic style that often utilized dense symbolism, paradox, irony, tension and ambiguous meaning, all hallmarks of O’Connor’s writing. New Criticism also professed that a work was to have a high degree of unity and self-containment.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Literature is many things: provoking, heartwarming, emotional, traumatic, poetic, maybe even life-changing. Literature can also be incredibly ambiguous. While literature can be “simply read”, when one takes a step back and looks at a piece through specific lenses, the work can take on an incredibly different, deeper meaning. Taking the lead of criticisms such as formalist, psychoanalytical, biological, feminist, Marxist, etc., one can dig deeper into a text and discover new meanings and morals from it. Not only can this confirm obvious written meanings, it can also take a seemingly black and white concept and fill it in with shades of grey, providing new possibilities and interpretations that might conflict, support, or enhance an initial reading. For the purposes of delving deeper into multiple possible interpretations, looking at a piece through the lenses of multiple different criticisms can be incredibly helpful. Not only can this give you alternative ways of looking at things, it might also be able to explain subtleties or behavior through a much more concrete understanding.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To emphasize the work seems to involve severing it from those who actually read it,…” (23). If all the focus would be on just the text of the literature, then it’s easy to say we are doing nothing more than ignoring the context and reducing the analytical explanations of literature; making them into a set of rhetorical devices. Brooks, throughout his essay, explained how he was attacked multiple times for his use of New Criticism but he does commiserate those who would “recommend brighter, more amateur and more human criticism” (25). Much like with poetry, ignoring the context means we would be ignoring the emotional effects it would bring towards the readers. With these disadvantages, there would be limitations with the theory.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everyday Use

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Wilfred L. Guerin, Earle Labor, Lee Morgan, Jeanne C. Ressmen, John R. Willingham. Oxford University Press. New York. 1999 (230-233)…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Donald E. Hall. Literary and Cultural Theory: From Basic Principles to Advanced Applications. Houghton Mifflin, 2001.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Catch 22 Reader Response

    • 2356 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A reader response criticism complies with my beliefs of Literature, in that everyone who reads a book comes from a figuratively different place than any other reader. Since everyone is a unique individual, the impressions, and meanings of passages are to be interpreted by these readers in their own unique and individual…

    • 2356 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Graff’s chapter 15 “On Closer Examination”, he explains different ways to interpret writings. Graff speaks about literary criticism and literary analysis. Instead of critics making comments about work they actually help debate and continue writings. Graff writes “Literary critics after all don’t make assertions about literary works out of the blue. Rather, they contribute to discussions and debates about the meaning and significance of literary works, some which may continue for years and even centuries” (185).…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world of literature exists because of the literary works that have been uniquely crafted throughout time; in fact, such works of literature exist thanks to the great masterminds of literary authors—both dead and alive. When one thinks of the literary world, he or she should think about its sub work—the world of literary interpretations. Why? Think about it: The world consists of diverse readers, and for that reason, one is exposed to a wide range of literary interpretations; thus, enabling he or she to formulate his or her unique literary analysis. When it comes to interpreting a literary text, it is pivotal for one to realize that his or her job is to develop an understanding of the text’s meaning—develop his or her own philosophy of the text. In addition, at times, one will encounter individuals that make such a beautiful impact in his or her life, to a point where he or she cannot imagine what life would look like without him or her.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russian Prime Minister Joseph Stalin once said, "A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic." The impersonalization of war and death that he shares is an realistic characterization of war; originally intending to improve the lives of people, yet inevitably leading to the destruction of human life. Author Kurt Vonnegut endorses this view in his novel Slaughterhouse-Five; he shows that war can never be justified as long as innocent life is lost. Throughout Slaughterhouse-Five, Vonnegut explores the theme of free will in order to illustrate the absurdity of war. Vonnegut conveys this through setting, characters, structure, and style.…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The New Criticism.” Introduction. Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Linda Pavlovski. Vol. 146. Detroit: Gale, 2004. 1-2. Literature Criticism Online. Web. 29 Mar. 2013.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    New Historicism is a literary theory based on the idea that literature should be studied and intrepreted within the context of both the history of the author and the history of the critic. Based on the literary criticism of Stephen Greenblatt and influenced by the philosophy of Michel Foucault, New Historicism acknowledges not only that a work of literature is influenced by its author's times and circumstances, but that the critic's response to that work is also influenced by his environment, beliefs, and prejudices. New Historicist looks at literature in a wider historical context, examining both how the writer's times affected the work and how the work reflects the writer's times, in turn recognizing that current cultural contexts color that critic's conclusions.For example, when studying Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, one always comes to the question of whether the play shows Shakespeare to be anti-Semitic. The New Historicist recognizes that this isn't a simple yes-or-no answer that can be teased out by studying the text. This work must be judged in the context in which it was written; in turn, cultural history can be revealed by studying the work — especially, say New Historicists, by studying the use and dispersion of power and the marginalization of social classes within the work. Studying the history reveals more about the text; studying the text reveals more about the history.The New Historicist also acknowledges that his examination of literature is "tainted" by his own culture and environment. The very fact that we ask whether Shakespeare was anti-Semitic — a question that wouldn't have been considered important a century ago — reveals how our study of Shakespeare is affected by our civilization.New Historicism, then, underscores the impermanence of literary criticism. Current literary criticism is affected by and reveals the beliefs of our times in the same way that literature reflects and is reflected by its own historical contexts. New…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    historicism

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    New Historicism acknowledges that any criticism of a work is colored by the critic’s beliefs, social status, and other factors. Many New Historicists begin a critical reading of a novel by explaining themselves, their backgrounds, and their prejudices. Both the work and the reader are affected by everything that has influenced them. New Historicism thus represents a significant change from previous critical theories like New Criticism, because its main focus is to look at many elements outside of the work, instead of reading the text in isolation.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays