Preview

Judicial Precedent

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2229 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Precedent
Name:

BTEC Level 3 Applied Law (Unit 2)

Judicial Precedent

P1: explain the application of judicial precedent in the courts

You will need to know:

What is judicial precedent?
The development of the system
The hierarchy of the courts
The difference between ratio decidendi and obiter dicta
The difference between binding and persuasive precedent
How law reports are used

What is judicial precedent?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Introduction to the doctrine of Judicial Precedent

The system of judicial precedent involves common law (also known as case law or judge-made law). There are areas of both criminal and civil law that have not been codified by Parliament. The system of precedent ensures that there is a consistent application of these laws in the courts.

The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the Latin term ‘stare decisis’.

What does “stare decicis” mean?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

What is “stare decisis” in full and what does it mean?

“Stare decisis et non quieta movere”

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

1. Why does it exist?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

2. How does it do this?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

In the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, the House of Lords

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Precedents are a past case that is used as an example or as guidance as it has similar facts and circumstances. There are 3 types of Precedents; Original, Binding and Persuasive. They can be used instead of statutory laws in civil cases. They are created when a new case, which has never been trialled in the UK courts. An example of this was the London bombings in 2005. The rulings for this trial will now be applied to future cases, similar to this. Judges look at a previous case, which is similar and in an equal or higher court and they will then use this information to decide…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week1 Busn 420

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The American legal system, a direct descendant of the English legal system, began to develop in 1066 and is always evolving. However, the main principles or the “backbone” of this legal system remains the same. The different sources of American law include the Constitution, state constitutions, statutes, common or “case” law, a body of administrative regulations, and court rules. The most important among these various sources of law, other than Constitutional provisions, is common law. The common law process allows judges to hear cases and make decisions, effectively becoming law, based upon these cases. These case decisions become the common law and others must adhere to this “judge-made” law. In the common law process, the judge’s decision or the “holding” of the case binds future courts and creates precedent.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law study guide

    • 3207 Words
    • 12 Pages

    *Case Law, Statutory Interpretation and Precedent: Case law clarifies the meaning of statutes or provides statutory interpretation. When a court decides a new question or problem, its decision becomes a precedent, which stands as the law in future cases that involve that particular problem (stare decisis: using precedents). Common law: developing a body of law that is not statutory but addresses long standing issues.…

    • 3207 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Precedent generally refers to some prior action that guides what is done with the action today. As the judges decisions were recorded and passed around, this lead to more continuity and predictability with verdicts in court by judges. As this took place not every case had to be heard if there was an earlier decision on the issue. They referred back to the earlier decision for the case without hearing the current case.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supreme Court Cases

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation. During the two-hour interrogation, Miranda allegedly confessed to committing the crimes, which the police apparently recorded. Miranda, who had not finished ninth grade and had a history of mental instability, had no counsel present. At trial, the prosecution's case consisted solely of his confession. Miranda was convicted of both rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. He appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, claiming that the police had unconstitutionally obtained his confession. The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction. Miranda appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1966.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Decisions

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Problems are questions that come up as a result of physical service provisions that need to be taken into account when devising solutions. An example of this is out of all of the minority groups that are enrolled in the Unites States School System 60% of Asian students are failing in their courses. Policies are solutions that were established based on problems that were identified for the purpose of ensuring that the organization will meet the standard in which it was intended. An example of this is would be work study programs that would help the students that are failing in their courses to ensure that they succeed and that the problem that caused this issue could be effectively eliminated. A program is an established setting in which the purpose is to fulfill a goal. In this case the goal is to hep students that are struggling academically improve on their skills, and the established setting could be something like tutor sessions or after-school classes. A good example of a program that does this is The Slyvian Center because they have tutors there for those that are middle school through high school to help them in the courses that they need improvement in.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Cases

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States court always has issues thrown at them, but their biggest issue that has last ever since it was created is civil rights. Multiple cases relate with this topic. However, some rule against, but some also rule with it. The Supreme Court has made many decisions to protect the rights of other races in the United States: Dred Scott v. Sanford, Shelly v. Kraemer, and Loving v. Virginia…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The theory of legal precedent has changed the face of the Criminal Justice System and Criminal Courts in many ways. Previously judges made decisions solely on what they believed, without mentioning existing cases. The decisions were only base on what they were told about the pending case, and with that information they provided a suitable conclusion. Today judges base their decisions on previous cases, to be able to justify their actions. Legal precedent is extremely beneficial to our Criminal justice system and our court system because it allows consistency, reliability and predictability within our decisions.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Decisions

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I chose Drug testing programs for welfare applicants. The reason I chose this is because I happen to agree with doing so. I disagree with the junction that the judge put in saying that it is “likely unconstitutional”. I feel this because I am a strong supporter in helping those who are in need, not those that are abusing the help. As a mother of two, and have been on state assistance for help, I often would see those that are known offenders of the system, and find it very disheartened over the fact that we are helping those that are not willing to help themselves.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime= conduct that violates criminal law for which there is no legally accepted justification or excuse.…

    • 2658 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 531

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Common Law is based on the concept of precedence - on how the courts have interpreted the law. Under common law, the facts of a particular case are determined and compared to previous cases having similar facts in order to reach a decision by analogy. Common law applies mostly at the state level. It originated in the 13th century when royal judges began recording their decisions and the reasoning behind the decisions.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Precedent is the way that English Common Law has evolved since the time of Henry II when courts were unified into a national system, making it common throughout England. Integral to it is the Latin phrase ‘stare decisis’ which literally means ‘to stand by what has been decided’. Its meaning in the case of judicial precedent is very similar, that a Judge will go by the same ruling as a previous judge has in the same cases; providing that the precedent comes from a higher or equal court, if it is from a lower court then the precedent is only considered, but may be used. It should be noted that this was not categorically announced by judges until the 19th Century.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sources Of English Law

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This reliance upon precedent makes the past decisions of judges and case law vital to the English Legal System, and also give the Judges far more power in the Legal process as unlike their French counterparts…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law of Precedent

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    time, a law may be found as no longer applicable, or on the other hand, a new…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is often believed that the relationship between certainty and flexibility in judicial precedent has struck a fine line between being necessary and being precarious. The problem is that these two concepts of judicial precedent are seen as working against each other and not in tandem. There is proof, however, that as contrasting as they are on the surface they are actually working together to achieve one common goal.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays