Preview

Foreign Trade Agreement

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foreign Trade Agreement
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT: A Double Edged Knife?

1. INTRODUCTION

Indian economic policy after independence was influenced by the colonial experience. The economic policies of the British Raj effectively bankrupted India’s large handicrafts industry and caused a massive drain of India’s resources. An estimate by Cambridge University historian Angus Maddison reveals that India’s share of world income fell by 22.6% in 1700,comparable to Europe’s share of 23.3.%, to a low of 3.8% in 1952.

Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister, along with the statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis, carried on by Indira Gandhi formulated and oversaw economic policy. An important postulate of that policy was the tariffs being levied on imported goods. Tariffs are charged by customs official to allow the landing of the imported goods in the port. The purpose behind levying tariffs is mainly to protect the domestic industries from foreign competition. Tariffs serve to protect the domestic industries through the revenue tariffs and the protective tariff. The revenue tariffs contain certain set rates to apply on the imports to increase the revenue earning of the government. Whereas protective tariffs serve to superficially amplify the cost of the imported goods so that the buyer has to pay more money for the purchase of an imported good which can be purchased at a lesser price from an indigenous manufacturer. They expected favorable outcomes from this strategy, because it involved both public and private sectors and was based on direct and indirect state intervention, rather than the more extreme Soviet-style central command system. India’s low average growth rate from 1947-80 was decisively referred to as the Hindu rate of growth, because of the unfavorable comparison with growth rates in other Asian countries, especially the “East Asian Tigers”.

In the late 80s, the government led by Rajiv Gandhi eased by restrictions on capacity expansion for incumbents, removed price



References: * The Frontline magazine * Wikipedia * The Hindu * The Economic Times * Various websites

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jwaharlal Nehro, the author of The Discovery of India, states that Great Britain exploited the Indian Economy detrimentally. During British reign in India, British parliament disconnected the East India Company from supplying and manufacturing Indian goods within the country itself. The British, on the other hand, had all access to the goods. Nehru states, “The Indian Textile Industry collapsed, affecting vast members of weavers and artisans.”…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this reason Indians made minimal profit in comparison to the British. Britain had no interest in how much Indians made, which resulted in starvation and famine because there was not enough money to buy food. As a matter of fact, Britain…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other side of this, British Imperialism did have its downfalls for India; from loss of money, famine, and racism, to dependency and a loss of culture – the wounds ran deep. One of the worst effects it had on the people of India was the loss of culture. This came in the form of losing their previous economy. This happened because England urged Indians to buy products that were mass-created in England and cheaper, rather than purchasing their own handmade items in India. The industries affected by this were the metal, cloth,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    NAFTA, North American Free Trade Agreement, is indeed a trade agreement that was signed by United States, Canada and Mexico.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The over-reliance on The United States as a primary export market for Canadian goods and services , even as costly input suppliers , despite the economical volatility that the U.S has been experiencing during the past 4 years and also regardless of the endless opportunities of much more beneficial trade relations with several other key players who will have great influence over the Global international trade traffic , in the near future.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    India Supplied raw materials and provided markets for England’s industrial goods, yet destruction of industry lead to unemployment on a vast Scale…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SPICE Chart on Imperialism

    • 1668 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4. British held most of the political and economic power and they used this to restrict Indian-owned industries including cotton textiles. This led to a loss of self-sufficiency for many locals and, in the late 1800s, India experienced a severe famine.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The impact of an import tariff in a small nation is entirely unlike then an import tariff from a larger nation. When smaller nations imposes a tariff, it does not affect world prices, however the price of the importable commodity will start to rise, usually by the amount of the tariff for manufacturers and trade in the small nation. When large nations impose a tariff, it will reduce the volume of trade. Large nation tariffs also improve terms of the nation’s trade. Since the volume of trade is being reduced, it tends to lesson the nation’s welfare. However it also can improve the nation’s welfare. It depends on the welfare of the nation to if it actually rises or falls depending on the two conflicting forces.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Imperialism

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    India was the jewel in the crown of the British Empire. India was a country with an abundance of resources. The British took cloth, spices, and other items from India and sold them for profit. English exports from India’s resources were produced in massive quantities to guarantee economic growth. The British’s desire for more and more wealth helped them maintain control of India. In the process, many British people took advantage of the India people for their own personal gain.The impact of colonialism made advancements in India’s technology such as the railroad systems, dams, bridges, and canals. The railroad system in India was the fourth largest in the world and helped the Indian economy to be more modern. However, due to British trade laws the Indian industry declined. The economic benefits India reaped went straight to the British to benefit them. Many Indian farmers lost their stable supply of food because every farmer were prompted to grow cash crops rather than crops to feed themselves. Many people died due to a decline of food and famine struck. Since the British imposed high taxes on agriculture and were required to grow cash crops that didn’t help with their hungry needs, many looked for…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is NAFTA? NAFTA stands for, "North American Free Trade Agreement." NAFTA is an agreement that was signed between Mexico, U.S., and Canada. NAFTA was put into place on January 1, 1994. The reasoning behind NAFTA was to create an agreement was that helped to eliminate "tariff" and also non-tariff barriers to free trade among, Mexico, U.S., and Canada. The concept of trade liberalization helps us to understand how NAFTA works because trade liberalization is, "the removal of restrictions or barriers on the free exchange of goods between nations." (Investopedia) This definition is exactly the reason behind NAFTA. One positive impact was the increase in the economic growth. This resulted in the U.S. economy growing by 0.5% per year. Another…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What are the main reasons why governments across the Americas are pushing for the free trade area?.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Asia and Africa had different points of view on a constantly growing economy after times of devastation (WW2). Both with different ideas of an ideal economy, but with the same goals, which made their economies grow differently until the current day. After World War II Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister, desired to obtain the proficient route of transporting resources, which many fellow countries like Russia had. Jawaharlal saw the private sector as a waste of time and didn’t believe that the PSD method economy would give India economical advances. After denying the Private Sector, Nehru developed the Economic Activity and Planning Commission (EAPC) which had managing and balancing the economy as main goal. The commission started of strong, but its low rate of change made the commission have poor results. No one denied the commission and eventually it reached economical stability, but it slow growth meant that the state enterprises were hurting public goods and resources. In 1980 The Indian nation believed in change when Nehru’s grandson came into rule. Nehru’s grandson just created more liberal policies and bad economic decisions about foreign trade, which led India into a slow economical crisis. When Rajiv Gandhi came to power on 1984 he completely turned around Indian economy. Rajiv increased…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Age of Imperialism Effects

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imperialism of India by the British began in the 18th century. The raw material imported from India was benefiting the British economy, while the India suffered. In addition the British tax laws caused a major crisis and killed one third of the total Indian population, mostly peasants because they were not able to pay taxes therefore stripped from land and unable to produce food. Although imperialism of India in the 19th century was alike to the imperialism in the 18th century in that the British were guided by selfish desires, it slightly differed. The British now became interested in more than one factor, which was cotton. More resources were being looked at, the British were in need of iron for railroads, and their new advanced machinery. The people living in exploited India were suffering, while the British enjoying a luxurious life. The imperialism of India also had some positive aspects. British somewhat modernized India. They built railroads, established a postal system and a telegraph system. Infrastructure took place. Some social changes were…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nafta Free Trade

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In an economic age in which speedy transactions of imports and exports are essential, is free trade a necessity for aiding worldwide economic development? At least John F. Kennedy thought so, he being the initiator of removing tariffs and other limitations on U.S. imports. His hypothesis was that by doing that, other nations would follow America's example and leadership. However, that never happened because the other nations were more concerned with their own problems. Even today, the United States continues to support free trade, an example being NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement). The problem is that America's generosity has caused the foreign industry to take over the U.S. marketplace. This unfortunately has resulted in high unemployment rates just because consumers and firms can purchase foreign goods for a little less than domestic products. But with this country's abundant resources, is free trade really necessary?…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On January 1, of 1994 a new approach to trade amongst North American countries took effect. With the aid of the United States Congress, President Bill Clinton was able to form a contract between The North American Countries of Canada, Mexico, and The United States of America. This contract, known as the North American Free Trade Agreement (or NAFTA for short) was designed with many economic results in mind. Hopes were that not only would trade be easier, cheaper, and more abundant for all countries, but economic wealth and growth would follow. Support for NAFTA was split among most citizens of this country. One side seeing the proposal as having the potential for great economic success in each country involved. The other announcing that this plan would prove to be terribly detrimental to United States employment. 14 years after coming into effect the question still remains Is NAFTA in the best interest of the United States? And what can we expect of it in the future?…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays