Preview

ethics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2091 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ethics
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
THIRD DIVISION
G.R. No. 183385 February 13, 2009
EVANGELINA MASMUD (as substitute complainant for ALEXANDER J. MASMUD), Petitioner, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (First Division) and ATTY. ROLANDO B. GO, JR., Respondents.
R E S O L U T I O N
NACHURA, J.:
Before the Court is a petition for review on certiorari1 assailing the Decision2 dated October 31, 2007 and the Resolution dated June 6, 2008 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 96279.
The facts of the case are as follows:
On July 9, 2003, Evangelina Masmud’s (Evangelina) husband, the late Alexander J. Masmud (Alexander), filed a complaint3 against First Victory Shipping Services and Angelakos (Hellas) S.A. for non-payment of permanent disability benefits, medical expenses, sickness allowance, moral and exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees. Alexander engaged the services of Atty. Rolando B. Go, Jr. (Atty. Go) as his counsel.
In consideration of Atty. Go’s legal services, Alexander agreed to pay attorney’s fees on a contingent basis, as follows: twenty percent (20%) of total monetary claims as settled or paid and an additional ten percent (10%) in case of appeal. It was likewise agreed that any award of attorney’s fees shall pertain to respondent’s law firm as compensation.
On November 21, 2003, the Labor Arbiter (LA) rendered a Decision granting the monetary claims of Alexander. The dispositive portion of the decision, as quoted in the CA Decision, reads:
WHEREFORE, foregoing considered, judgment is rendered finding the [First Victory Shipping Services and Angelakos (Hellas) S.A.] jointly and severally liable to pay [Alexander’s] total permanent disability benefits in the amount of US$60,000.00 and his sickness allowance of US$2,348.00, both in Philippine currency at the prevailing rate of exchange at the time of payment; and to pay further the amount of P200,000.00 as moral damages, P100,000.00 as exemplary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ameripride Case Summary

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court entered an order finding: The amount subject to equitable allocation totaling at $15,508,912.36. The court calculated the amount by combining AmeriPride's investigation, remediation costs, then adding the $10.25 milllion in AmeriPride settlement to Huhtamaki and Cal-Am. the court then deducted $3.25 million AmeriPride received in settling its claims against Chromalloy and Petrolane. Applying the Uniform Cotribution Among Tortfeasor's Act's ("UCATA") pro tanto approach to equitably account for these settlements. Next, the Court apportioned the liability fifty-fifty between TEO and AmeriPride and holding TEO responsible for paying one half of all future cleanup costs. The Court also ordered TEO to pay prejudgement interest to AmeriPride "in amounts calculated in accordance with 42 U.S.C. §9607."…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCC 40, PC 3: Court Case

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    .Application: according to the written agreement LLC payed the capital account and 2005 compensation to Olson.Olson may argue that due to the oral agreement LLC breached it`s duty to pay fair market value of a member.on the other hand LLC may argue that it only owe duty according to written agreement about paying the 2005 compensation and capital account and oral agreement is not accepted by the LLC.The Olson may argue that the LLC has to pay the compensation that had occurred not…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case begins with the relationship between California and Hawaiian Sugar Company (C&H), the purchaser, and Sun Ship, Inc., the contractor for the design and delivery of a vessel to ship raw sugar for C&H from Hawaii to California. Sun Ship went into contract with C&H on November 14, 1979 and agreed upon the delivery of the vessel on June 30, 1981, one and three quarter years, for the agreed upon amount of $20,405,000 . According to Cheeseman (2013) a liquidated damages clause, defined as “damages that parties to a contract agree in advance should be paid if the contract is breached”, was included and called for $17,000 per day for each day that the vessel was not delivered. Additional details from Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1986 indicate that C&H went into another agreement with a company by the name of “Halter” for the purchase of "one oceangoing catamaran tug boat" that was, unbeknownst to Sun Ship, supposed to connect with the vessel that Sun Ship was contracted to deliver. Sun completed the vessel, which was…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedure: Plaintiff Katko filed suit against Briney in Mahaska District Court seeking damages for injury suffered by defendant. After trial by jury and in accordance with jury verdict, Court awarded plaintiff actual and punitive damages. Court denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial. Defendant appealed.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anna Matero Case

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I attended a pre hearing conference on your behalf in the above-referenced matter before Judge Alade in New Windsor, New York on 05/15/17. The claimant’s widow, Anna Matero was present and was represented by William Cerle.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The hearing of this case was held in the Court of Appeal of the New South Wales Supreme Court.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: This case involves 38 year old seaman Redman seeking damages for personal injuries sustained through the defendant's negligence. The defendant moved for a dismissal of Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ANDREA V. DENOLF Case Study

    • 4838 Words
    • 20 Pages

    1) Whether the Gun Free School Zone Act of 1997 (18 USC 922 q) applies to DeNolf and whether it violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution…

    • 4838 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    -Fact: Russell (D) was severely injured at work, and Sacred Heart General Hospital (P) provided medical treatment. Russell, uncertain who his employer was at the time of the injury, filed workers; compensation claims against each purported employer. The four purported employers and their insurers, including Aetna (D), subsequently entered into a Disputed Claim Settelement (DCS) agreement with Russell (D). The DCS agreement provided the certain sums and expenses would be the sole responsibility of Aetna (D), while Russell (D) would be responsible for his own temporary and permanent disability plus future medical expenses. The Hospital (P), then, brought sult to recover payment for Russell's (D), medical care, claiming an implied-in-fact contract and account stated against Russell (D), and third party beneficiary status under the DCS agreement against Aetna (D). At the close of evidence, Aetna (D) made a motion for a directed verdict, which was denied. The jury relieved Russell (D) of the claim against him, but rendered judgment against Aetna (D). Aetna (D) appealed, claiming it was error to deny…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Del Mos

    • 532 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Case No. A07A1392, judgment affirmed the trial court’s decision granting judgment in favor Carlito’s in issue of medical expenses. Judgment reversed in trial courts grant of summary judgment to Carlito’s as to liability under Georgia Dram Shop Act, OCGA §51-1-40, and remanded the case for further proceedings in that issue. Case No. A07A1392, the court reversed the trial courts denial of Carlito’s motion to dismiss Capp’s claim for punitive damages under OCGA §51-1-40.…

    • 532 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because I now conclude that the agreement to arbitrate was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable, Bally 's motion to dismiss the Complaint and to compel arbitration…

    • 3978 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Although this article was published in 1992, it provided me with an abundance of facts for the history of litigation and how it exploded into such a large industry…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    References: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    business law

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nancy Johnston, appellant, brought suit against her employer, Del mar Distributing Co., Inc., appellee, alleging that her employment had been wrongfully terminated. Del Mar filed a motion for summary judgment in the trial court alleging that appellant’s pleadings failed to state a cause of action. After a hearing on the motion, the trial agreed with Del Mar and granted its motion for summary judgment.…

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law case

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of this arbitration paper is written for arbitration meeting conducted on April 4th 2014 for the incident happened in February 15th.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays