Preview

Differences between American and British Politics

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences between American and British Politics
PARLIAMENT

Parliamentary and Presidential systems

Systems of gov't can be classified as either parliamentary or presidential. The terms refer to the type of relationship between the executive and the legislature.
In parliamentary systems, the executive and the legislature are interconnected. There is no strict separation of powers. The gov't (executive) is normally chosen from the representatives of the majority party (or coalition group, if no single party has a majority) elected to legislature (the Parliament or assembly). The government is accountable for its actions to the legislature and it is dependent upon the continued support of the legislature to remain in office.
In presidential systems the legislature and executive are distinct (a clear separation of powers). The head of the executive, the President, is chosen by the electorate rather than by the legislature. Presidents do not sit in, and cannot normally be removed by, the legislature. The President acts as head of government and as ceremonial head of state.
Most European countries have parliamentary systems whereas the USA has the best known example of a presidential system. Presidential systems can also be found in Latin American states and in some Asian and African countries. Describing a system of gov't as 'presidential', however, does not necessarily that the country has a president rather than a monarch as its head of state. Ireland and Germany, for example, both have presidents as heads of state but they both operate parliamentary systems of gov't.

Differences between parliamentary and presidential systems

The UK
The USA
The executive and the legislature are tightly linked. The executive - the gov't ministers - sit in one of the two Houses of Parliament (the Commons or the Lords). Ministers take part in debate and vote together with the other members of Parliament.
The executive is not independent of Parliament - the HoCs can overthrow the gov't by a vote of no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The executive is made up of the Prime Minister (PM) acting in place on the monarch and a group of ministers known as the PMs Cabinet. All cabinet members (including the PM) are members’ of the Privy Council and must also be members of the Commons or the Lord’s, by convention most being from the Commons. Therefore the executive is borne out of the legislature and directly accountable to it. The executive has many functions, such as the power of patronage which is vested in the PM, the setting of the agenda for government and the prioritising of legislation. The close union between the executive and the legislature is prima facie, a potential for abuse as liberal democratic theory calls for a separation between powers.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government in the UK is a representative body elected for and by the people. The UK uses the parliamentary system as its model of representation; this means the different areas of government which are the legislative, judiciary and executive branches work in and through each other as opposed to the Presidential model which separates the powers. Westminster Parliament is the acting microcosm for the UK society; it is a small group of 365 MPs who are chosen to represent their constituencies. Each MP is given power through trusteeship when voted in, this meaning that they will try to carry out what is best for their constituency. They are also once voted in known as a mandate, the authority granted by a constituency to an MP to act as its representative.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the important factors that influence Parliament’s work is that the executive is selected from parliament, and as such can normally control Parliament through a disciplined majority.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thus, the Presidential system follows a track to democracy by giving the people the change to have a right in saying and choosing what they find best for their nation. However, in a parliamentary system the ideas are different. Its track to democracy is attempted when the people are included in the parliament and the power of implementing policies is not just restricted to one person. Also, the systems have in common the fact that they depend on legislature, which helps the systems to execute and implement laws. Providing real life examples of countries and their running of the systems, will help evaluate to what extent these countries fit in the path of democracy and how their ideas are applied in reality.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia's government has a presidential - parliamentary system which consists of a dual executive with a president who is the head of state and a prime…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three different types of regimes around the world. The first is a parliamentary regime which develops all power fused together. The executive branch and the legislative branch are combined and brought together into one. Secondly, having a presidential regime leads to a separation of power. There is no fusion of power whatsoever within this regime. The United States of America is a perfect example of having a presidential regime. The executive leader, known as the president, is voted upon the office. Lastly, having a semi-presidential regime leads to a shared power. The president still exists, but he is not the only one with the power to the state. Alongside is a prime minister and a cabinet, chosen by the president. All together they share responsibility for the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a multitude of political systems in the world ranging from free democracies to authoritarian regimes. Of these, however, three in particular stand out. These are the presidential system of countries such as the United States, Mexico and select other Latin American countries; the parliamentary system of countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Germany; and the semi-presidential system of countries such as France, Finland, and Senegal. In actuality there are many similarities between these three systems. Each, however, is also unique from each of the others. It is these similarities and contrasts, which will be the topic of this paper.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A presidential system is a system of government[->0] where an executive branch[->1] is led by a person who serves as both head of state[->2] and head of government[->3]. That person is usually elected and titled "president", but can also be an unelected monarch.In a presidential system, the executive branch exists separately from the legislature[->4], to which it is not responsible[->5] and which cannot, in normal circumstances, dismiss[->6] it.[1]…

    • 3982 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the U.S. political system, the president is the official head of state. The president is elected under the electoral college system. In the U.K., although the prime minister usually has the spotlight on political matters and is the official head of government, the queen or king is the official head of state. The queen officially signs off on acts of parliament and, just as the U.S. president delivers the State of the Union Address every year, the queen reads the "Speech from the Throne," which is written by the prime minister. In U.K, the monarch is more of a…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Bagehot “a Presidential system endows the incumbent with both the ceremonial functions of a head of state and the effective functions of a chief executive.”(Bagehot) In a Presidential system the executive branch exists and resides outside of the legislature. The executive branch does not purpose legislature but have the power to veto them. “The president has a fixed term in government and it is usually a difficult process trying to eliminate the president.”(Verney) The executive branch controls their cabinet and does not members of the cabinet serve at their will, this means the President can hire or fire anyone from the cabinet. According to Verney “Parliamentary system, consists of the head of government that are dependent on the confidence of the legislature and can be dismissed by a legislative vote of no confidence.”(Verney) There are two main types of parliamentary democracy which consist of the ‘Westminster system’ and the ‘Consensus system’ but there is also a hybrid of the presidential and parliamentary system which is called the semi-presidential system. The Westminster system derives from the UK and can be found in many of Britain’s ex-colonies such as India and Canada. The Westminster system tends to be a more adversarial style of debating. The consensus system…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three branches of government are very important components to determine comparison between the parliamentary system and the presidential system. The parliamentary system and presidential system of government has the same body but they differ in terms of the division of powers. In a parliamentary system, the executive body is divided into two sections "dignified" and "efficient". “Dignified” or ceremonial leadership centers upon the head of state, “efficient” leadership rests with a team of ministers, headed by Prime Minister and accountable to parliament (Abdul Rashid Moten & Syed Serajul Islam, 2011). President or monarch is a head of states while Prime Minister becomes head of government. In UK, the Prime Minister is the real power of executive whereas the highest member of executive in US is the President. In the UK constitution, the Queen is the head of the three main branches of the government. The Queen has responsible as "the Queen in Parliament" in which he played a role in the legislation concerned with his approval towards a bill that was enacted by the parliament. The Queen also serves as chairman of the State (executive). In generally, the Queen has a very limited jurisdiction in the constitution. Most executive roles held by the Prime Minister. It is called a rubber stamp. The role of the monarch in parliamentary system is merely symbolic and…

    • 2814 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the government sits in Parliament and the law Lords sit in the House of Lords, there is no strict separation of powers.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This system is called the Parliamentary form of Government since under this system the Parliament is supreme. Under this system there is a close relationship between the Executive and the Legislature. In fact, the Executive is a part of the Legislature-the…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays