Preview

Compoundable and Non-compoundable offences

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
712 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compoundable and Non-compoundable offences
Compoundable and Non Compoundable Offences - Some offences largely affect only the victim and no considerable harm is considered to be done to the society. In such offences, if the offender and victim compromise, there is no need to waste court's time in conducting a trial. The process of reaching a compromise is called Compounding. Conceptually, such offences, in which a compromise can be done and a trial can be avoided, are called Compoundable offence. Rest of the offences are non-compoundable
Technically, offences classified as Compoundable by Section 320 of Cr P C are compoundable. Section 320 specifies two kinds of Compoundable offences - one where permission of court is required before compounding can be done for example, voluntarily causing grievous hurt, Theft, criminal breach of trust, assault on a woman with intention to outrage her modesty, etc. and one where permission of the court is not required for example, causing hurt, adultery, defamation, etc. As per S. 320(3), if the abetment of an offence is an offence and if the offence is compoundable then abetment is also compoundable.

Only the person, who is specified in the classification tables in Section 320, has the right to compound the offence. The person is usually the victim. The offender cannot demand compounding as a right.

However, when an offender has been committed to trial or when he has been convicted and his appeal is pending, compounding can only be done with the leave of the court to which he is committed or to which the trial is pending. If an offender is liable for enhanced punishment or a different punishment on account of a previous conviction, compounding cannot be done. High Court and Court of Session may, under their power of revision in Section 401, can allow any person to compound any compoundable offence.

When an offence is compounded, it is equivalent to an acquittal.
Compoundable Offence Section 320
Non Compoundable Offence
Offences classified as compoundable by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Different for indigenous people, given no acknowledge of land ownership and traditional rights and customs as well as traditional rules…

    • 1138 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torts 1 Outline Pittman

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages

    6. Felony-Merger Doctrine: CL does not allow recovery for an act that was both a tort and a felony, but it is allowed under modern US law…

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing: For committing crimes such as: Vandalism, Trespass and Street Drinking you’ll be given an ASBO (Anti-social behaviour order) that lasts for 2 years (although it could be shortened if the offender behaves in a proper way E.g. not committing anymore anti social acts). Anyone over the age of 10 can be given an ASBO.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crimes less serious in nature and punished with a fine or a period of incarceration in a jail are referred to as ____________________.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress has expanded the definition of “aggravated felony”, but have never removed a crime from the list. Now, the law is not limited to only serious crimes, but to almost any criminal offense. There are over thirty types of new offenses that have been added, convictions of crimes that aren’t even violent. Convictions for theft, filing a false tax return, failing to appear in court and countless of other crimes committed lead to deportation of immigrants. In a sense, an aggravated felony has evolved into a term that does not require the term to be “aggravated” or a “felony” to qualify.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To me Indeterminate Sentencing is a very degraded and/or very disturbed type of sentencing. In this sentencing a legislature is the one who has say as to what the terms will be for the crime that has been committed and a judge gets the decision as to what the sentence will be for the offender. As I look at this information I feel that the judge should have a say in what the sentence will be, but not have all the power as to what it will be. A Parole Board gets to determine as to what the amount of time is that the offender will spend in prison for the crime he or she has committed. In this type of sentencing, one of the guidelines is that when determining the sentence it should meet all of the needs of the offender.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to James Rachels, he concluded the criminal justice system should be designed along the lines of retributivism, in much the way it currently is. Rachels comes to the conclusion the overall goal of punishment should be retributivism by examining the four requirements necessary for punishment. The four requirements for punishment are guilt, equal treatment, proportionality, and excuses. These requirements mean only the guilty get punished, each criminal who commits the same crime gets roughly the same punishment, the punishment is proportionate to the crime, and if provided a legit excuse, then no punishment is given. Rachels also argues that deterrence and rehabilitation do not meet the requirements, but retributivism does.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crimes and Misdemeanors

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    For the past fifty years, director and actor Woody Allen has evoked much laughter from his neurotic-style comedies. Less recognized, however, is his fascinating ability in utilizing both his stunning, humorous wit along with several philosophical concepts. Such a combination creates an engaged and thoroughly entertained audience, as well as a mentally-stimulated one. In his movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the philosophical concepts Allen touches upon deal with ethical and moral issues. What does 'do the right thing ' really entail; why not do the opposite if it leads to one 's personal success? In the absence of a God, who 's to say whether the choices we make are right or wrong? Answering these questions say much about the way one sees the world. This movie investigates such questions by intertwining two separate, parallel plots: the tragic story of Judah, and the comedic story led by Cliff Stern .There are two key moral positions that underlie the entire movie: Those with faith in God perceive the world as morally structured, forgiving, and full of true meaning. Those who do not believe in a God see the world as empty, pitiless, and devoid of meaning. After watching this movie for the third time, a consistent metaphor that integrates these positions revealed itself. Throughout the movie, nearly every scene visually and verbally involves the use of 'eyes ' to symbolize our perceptions on how we see the world, and how people do not see themselves and events the way others may see it. Although there are several elements, characters, and events worthy of an individual analysis, this paper will concentrate on how Allen 's film represents eyes to unveil hidden truths. To illustrate the use of 'eyes ' in this film I will investigate its role in the lives of Judah, Cliff, and Rabbi Ben. Keep in mind that all four of these characters each wear over-emphasized glasses.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the current system, the victim is offended yet again with the belittling or downgrading of the offense to assure a conviction by the prosecution. While we would all like to see justice, the trading of deals for convictions should be better managed as not to make a mockery of the justice system we hold dear. Likewise, implementation of specific criteria for consideration of a plea bargain should put in place as not to allow a habitual offender the opportunity to plea just to save on the preparation time of a trial. Finally, as seen in the prison and jail populations, the number of offenders with multiple offences, having previously taken a plea is an indications that the use of the plea bargain is a detriment to the justice system as the habitual offender is not deterred from criminal activity because of the greater than average chance that the charges will be reduced in a plea. As such, the proposal of a review of criminal histories and again meeting specific criteria for considerations of a plea may be an option to…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Offenders

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Every person has the right of appeal set in statute law. Appeals can only be dealt with by a higher court, so if you were sentenced to six months in a magistrate’s court you have to appeal to the Crown court. You can appeal against sentence or conviction for exqample you think six months is too harsh or you claim that you did not commit the offence you were convicted of.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An indeterminate sentencing is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. A judge can prescribe a particular term, after which an administrative body known as the parole board decides at what point the offender is to be released. A prisoner is aware that he or she is eligible for parole as soon as the minimum time has been served and that good behavior can further shorten the sentence.In determinate sentencing, a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. If the legislature deems that the punishment for a first-time armed robber is ten years, then the judge has no choice but to impose a sentence of ten years and the criminal will serve ten years minus good time before being freed. In good times sentencing, a reduction in time served by prisoners based on good behavior, conformity to rules, and ther positive actions. In truth-in-sentencing laws, legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve approximately the terms to whinch they were initially sentenced. The sentencing ritual strongly lends itself to the concept of individualized justice. Most judges consider two factors above all others: the seriousness of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Legislation

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Any persons convicted of any rape or sexual battery offense will not be eligible for parole.…

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    crim 131 lecture 1

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    an attempted crime is still a crime (general sentence is half of the completed crime)…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    • A group of citizens sworn to hear testimony and evidence at a trial and decide if the defendant is guilty or not of committing the crime(s)…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Habitual Offender Laws

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The central features of enhancement statues are (1) that they add severe penalties (twenty to twenty-five years) on to the penalty for committing the original crime, and (2) those receiving enhancement-statue punishments are not entitled to features such as early release, gain time, and provisional credits. In sentencing-guideline states, enhancement statues provide the amount of punishment by calculating the amount outside of the guidelines. The ultimate consequence of enhancement statues is that they ensure that the inmate undergoes a significantly long period of incarceration; this period is a flat-time sentence that cannot be affected by early-release procedures. Judges know that legislators have totally castrated the judicial discretion powers in every instance where they are faced with sentencing defendants convicted under enhancement statues. These enhancements have become common household names: three-strikes, 10-20-Life, habitual-criminal, and trafficking. Enhance sentences are almost universally disliked by trial judges, because they have no choice but to impose the statue in spite of mitigating factors. Of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays