Preview

Company Law Revision Questions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
986 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Company Law Revision Questions
2106AFE Revision Lecture Questions
Question 1
Short Answer Questions:
Provide a brief answer including the specific sections and sub-sections that apply under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). DO NOT use ILAC method to answer.

(a) On 1 February 2012, Mr Lawson was appointed as an administrator of Gogo Pty Ltd by the passing of a resolution by a majority of the directors of the company. Upon appointment, Mr Lawson convened the creditors’ first meeting on 4 February 2012.
Is this a valid meeting?

(b) The creditors of RedHot Pty Ltd (Redhot) appointed Mrs Sherman as the receiver to take possession of the secured property, sell it and use the proceeds to repay the secured debt owed by the company. The receiver borrowed $42,000 from Westpac bank during his appointment; however, there were insufficient funds available from the secured assets realisation to completely pay the debt, so that a shortfall exists. The receiver argued that the Managing Director of Red Hot must pay the shortfall.

Does the Managing Director of RedHot have to pay the debt?

(c) The Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd (Scottish Co-op) registered a new company called ‘Scottish Textile & Manufacturing Co Ltd’ (Textile) to manufacture rayon cloth. State licensing was required and experienced managers were needed in order to obtain a licence. Dr Meyer and Mr Lucas were managing directors and shareholders of Textile, although, the Scottish Co-op held the majority of the company's shares and appointed three other directors to the board. The remaining three directors were also directors of Scottish Co-op. In 2012, the licensing system was terminated by the government. Scottish Co-op used its majority of votes to transfer the entire business to a branch of the Co-op. Scottish Co-op also cut off the supply of raw materials to Textile. Textile could not continue, no profits were made and its share value crashed. Mr Meyer and Mr Lucas were helpless.

Advise Mr Meyer and Mr

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    LOBOFinal Exam 2

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2 This is an OPEN book examination. You can only use your prescribed text book and the Corporations Act 2001. No other materials are allowed.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Case Summary

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) as well as the Turquand rule of internal management in common…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    eng rwryw efhe gw gweth

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Spam Act 2003 (Cth)
Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Issue: the issue about company’s constitution and whether the loan contract between ABC bank and Sambal Pty Ltd is invalid.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Breaches of s180-184 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and Breaches of Common Law and Equitable Principles…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Consider comparative advantages and disadvantages of each form of association in the light of facts given.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Law

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The information revolution and the advances in technology during the past decades has brought to fore many challenges and issues to both governments and businesses, the age-old crime of espionage or the practice of spying to gather secret information is one the most potential issues facing information-based societies. Although, much has been documented as fact and fiction concerning the traditional foreign agents and spies, in today 's world of multi-national, multi-billion dollar corporations, and industrial espionage is a growing danger. Furthermore, this is aggravated by the fact that many large businesses are physically disseminated which has distributed management and administration, and more job specialization.…

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    in your examination. (The major exception here relates to pre2005 questions on fire legislation in unit NGC2 - don’t attempt…

    • 1592 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Auditing

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2) Bertha Bigga has been the engagement audit partner on the Wait Alert Limited (“WA”) account for a number of years. Roughly one year ago, WA’s long-standing company secretary resigned and the company took almost nine months to find a replacement. At WA’s request, Bertha performed company secretarial duties during this period of time.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law assignment

    • 4246 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The constitutional basis for the Corporations Act, 2001 is based on Ss 51 (xx) and 51 (xxxvii) of the commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, 1900.…

    • 4246 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ciro T, Symes C, Corporations Law in Principle LBC Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 8th edition 2009…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS LAW QUESTIONS

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. A state's constitution can't conflict with the U.S. Constitution or a federal law.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Company Law Assignment

    • 2362 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Give an assessment of the above statement in light of any applicable principles of common law under the law of companies. (25)…

    • 2362 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays