Preview

CJ 305

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CJ 305
Quizlet study cards:http://quizlet.com/22983674/cj-305-police-ethics-flash-cards/

Final Review: CJ 305
Bring Green Scantron! police required to read the citizen their rights who are arrested by police
-Miranda was convicted of rape.

Gideon v Wainright (case):
-Courts are required to provide counsel.
-Ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceedings which could jail or imprison the defendant; warren court’s judicial activism in criminal rights.
-6th Amendment exception for minors who are victims

Codes of Ethics/Conduct are in place to present a relationship between the police and citizens

The Exclusionary Rule – [not in constitution; used as interpretive tool] keep evidence out if it violated the defendants constitutional rights; applies to violations of a defendant’s 4th, 5th, or 6th amendment rights.

Dirty Harry(film) tactics – Not following police codes/rules to get evidence/info -- Oppose Miranda Case Decision, falls under exclusionary rule
1) a life is at stake
2) no time to get a warrant
3) there is a likelihood that it will work ( good faith exemption)
4) no other way to get the information.
“Knowing that the evidence will be subject to exclusion”.
*only way to circumnavigate exclusionary rule is imminent circumstances. - destruction of evidence - hot pursuit - inevitable discovery - consent - public safety exemption
--------------------------------------------
Blue Lies: Police are allowed to lie; used to control a person and make the police officers job easier; “its exceptionless” said by Kant
Police lie as a utility to achieve justice and receive the truth.

Accepted lies are...
1) told in furtherance of an organizational purpose
2) have a close relationship (nexus/connection) to that purpose
3) nature of the deception where there is an understanding that the deception could be effective
4) deception is considered to be in the public interest as opposed to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case US v. Calandra (1974), Calandra was being questioned by the federal grand jury about loan sharking business. The reason the jury was asking these question were based on the evidence obtained at his company. Calandra didn’t want to answer any questions because he felt that the search of the company was an unlawful search and that it violated his fourth amendment exclusionary rule. The refusal to answer the grand jury, was what was being question about this case. Calandra felt like because of the exclusionary rule unde0r the fourth amendment he didn’t have to answer but he was wrong. The supreme court held that the exclusionary rule was only applicable in criminal courts and was not meant to be seen as a right but as a way to reduce unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by police ("Oyez: US v. Calandra," n.d.).…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cjs 250

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sam is a security officer for ABC Corporation in the Phoenix area. He is always stationed at the security desk in the main lobby to greet employees and visitors. One day he observed an employee from the finance department muttering something under his breath and acting strangely as he walked by the security desk. He noticed this same behavior the following day. On the third day, there was a shooting in the finance department. The director of finance and her administrative assistant were shot and killed by the employee exhibiting strange behavior; the employee committed suicide prior to the arrival of the police.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter Four – The Exclusionary Rule Vicente Farias Jose Martinez The Exclusionary Rule  The Exclusionary Rule – Evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment cannot be used at trial – The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct – What other purpose does the exclusionary rule have? The Exclusionary Rule …

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cj 430

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the fourteenth I was assigned to the traffic unit on the night shift. The officer assigned to this position is given a traffic unit police vehicle, which is equipped with more items then other patrol cars. Some of the things being spike strips, laser radars and other various items. When on traffic duty the primary focus is on speeders. We were stationed near I-96 and took radar for the remainder of the night. We cited over twenty vehicles and had some other intense moments. For one of the stops we pulled over a felon that had a firearm in the vehicle. At this moment, my heart was beating much quicker and the situation became much more serious. We radio into dispatch for a priority unit to back us up. We then arrested the individual and drove to the jail. Most of the night consisted on specifically traffic duty with a slight amount of citizen calls.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    United States.[9] In Weeks, the Court suppressed evidence that was unlawfully obtained by federal officers and introduced into a federal prosecution. The Court addressed two concerns that were accomplished by suppressing unlawfully seized evidence. First, the remedy would enable courts to fulfill their obligatory duty of giving effect to the Fourth Amendment right.[10] In the unanimous opinion, Justice Day explained that without the remedy of suppression, “the protection of the 4th Amendment… is of no value.”[11] Weeks emphasized the “great principles” of the Constitution and expressed an unwillingness to sacrifice these fundamental rights to aid the conviction of one criminal.[12] The exclusionary rule was thus conceived as a necessary adjunct to the Fourth Amendment right…

    • 4459 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule is intended to reject prove acquired disregarding a criminal litigant's Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment ensures against irrational quests and seizures by law requirement work force. On the off chance that the hunt of a criminal suspect is preposterous, the proof acquired in the pursuit will be rejected from trial.The exclusionary administer is a court-made run the show. This implies it was made not in statutes go by authoritative bodies but instead by the U.S. Incomparable Court. The exclusionary control applies in government courts by goodness of the Fourth Amendment. The Court has decided that it applies in state courts in spite of the fact that the due procedure condition of the Fourteenth Amendment.(The Bill of Rights—the…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1100 CJ 2012 05s Feb

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain the exclusionary rule and list the 6 major cases that define the rule. The exclusionary rule is a rule that prohibits the use of evidence or testimony obtained in violation of civil rights liberties and rights protected by the U.S. Constitution. The 6 major cases are Weeks vs. United States, Silverthorne Lumber co. vs. United States, Wolf vs. Colorado, Mapp vs. Ohio, Hudson vs. Michigan, Herring vs. United States.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Basically the Exclusionary rule as set forth by the US Supreme Court states that any evidence obtained by police through search and seizure, arrest, interrogations and stop and frisk situations or any other evidence despite its relevance can be excluded as evidence. The Weeks v. United States was basically the origin of the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. In Weeks v United States Mrs, Weeks was arrested for shoplifting and attempted to get a note to her husband about this. Law enforcement went to the residence and without a warrant searched the home and found illegal lottery tickets and removed everything in relation to the tickets charging him with a federal crime because there was evidence showing these were handled through the mail. Mr. Weeks attorney filed with the courts this was illegally obtained evidence and should be excluded.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Warren Court left an unprecedented legacy of judicial activism in the area of civil rights law as well as in the area of civil liberties—specifically, the rights of the accused as addressed in Amendments 4 through 8. In the period from 1961 to 1969, the Warren Court examined almost every aspect of the criminal justice system in the United States, using the 14th Amendment to extend constitutional protections to all courts in every State. This process became known as the “nationalization” of the Bill of Rights. During those years, cases concerning the right to legal counsel, confessions, searches, and the treatment of juvenile criminals all appeared on the Court's docket.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is a legal procedure in the United States, which falls under the constitution. It protects citizens of the country in making sure that law enforcement officers are operating lawfully and that they abide by all search and seizure laws. It goes so far to protect the citizens of The United States that if a law enforcement officer illegally obtains evidence it can and most likely will be thrown out of the court. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusionary rule, exploring its fallacies…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When law enforcement or an government agency take it upon themselves to enter someone home or search a vehicle without a valid search warrant they are violating that persons Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. Evidence that could be admissible in a case may be excluded from trial if it is gather as a resulted from an illegal search or some other constitutional violation. The exclusionary rule prevents the use of most evidence gathered illegally. The rule can also be triggered by law enforcement violations of a person’s Fifth or Sixth Amendments right as well. I feel that is the case as it contains to John Smith and the search of his…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Essay

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The exclusionary rule has three elements. First, there must be an illegal action by a police officer, or by someone acting as an agent of the police. Second, there must be evidence secured. The third element states that there must be a casual connection between the illegal action and the evidence secured. “Fruit of the poisoned tree, inevitable discovering exception, and the good faith exception” are the three elements I will be collaborating about.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cj 425

    • 836 Words
    • 6 Pages

    parents may not be able to give consent of search and seizure if the child is paying room and board…

    • 836 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leading Group Challenges

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “The profession of policing and public safety continues to confront new challenges that also present a wealth of opportunities for initiating substantive change” (Batts, Smoot, & Scrivner, 2012, p. 18). Some have noted leaders in the criminal justice police organization face a crossroad when striking a balance between judicial and governmental expectations, the agency itself, stakeholders, and the public. According to Bisschop and Kimpe (2009), “The Diversity of these sometimes conflicting demands –representing the complexity inherent to the police organization –offers a number of distinct challenges for police leadership”…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Corruption Essay

    • 1047 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Police Corruption can be defined as a form of police misconduct in which law enforcement officers break their social contract and abuse their power for personal or department gain. There are three forms of police corruption. These forms are Nonfeasance, which involves failure to perform legal duty, another form is Misfeasance, which is failure to perform legal duty in a proper manner, and the third form is Malfeasance, which is commission of an illegal act. The three explanations of corruption are the “rotten apples”, “departmental”, and the other focuses on factors external to the department. An example of these would be an officer might feel unappreciated for their good work and actions and it might make them corruptible. An example of departmental explanation would be if officers feel uncommitted and unsupported, their outlooks and values are reinforced by others in the group which may lead to lack of commitment in their job, thereby leading to corruption. Some police officers may abuse their power because they see themselves as not enforcers of the law, but them as the law itself. The “blue wall of silence” is a term used in the United States to denote the unwritten rule that exists among officers, where they should not report on a colleague’s misconduct, errors, or crimes. This may impact an officer’s loyalty to their profession because they are not doing their job if they are letting another officer get away with crimes, and if they did report it then they would be breaking their loyalty to fellow cops. It’s important for officers to have a good ethical foundation before they enter into this job because it would help prevent them from doing wrong and abusing their power.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays