Preview

Business Law Scotland : Trust

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1106 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Scotland : Trust
Definition – the law of Trust determines the relationship among trustee, trustor and beneficiaries over the property. Trustor means owner of the property, which enjoys extended bundle of rights over his property. Trustee is a person who manages the property. Beneficiary: A beneficiary is anyone who receives benefits from any assets the trust owns.

We have two types of trust. First division of types:
First is Inter Vivos - the management of the property during one’s lifetime. Mortis Causa – after the death, the settlement of the property after the death.
Second division of types:
Public – set up for the interest of public, in general. (Russia, особняк)
Private – set up for the benefit of individuals or group of individuals. (Batman Begins)

1. Creation of Trust
Capacity (16 in Scotland)*
Declaration of the Trust
Transfer of property
Must have a valid purpose
1.1. Declaration of trust
Must announce:
Creation and specify the purpose, beneficiaries and trustees.
No “special or technical form of words is needed”
MacPherson v MacPherson’s curator bonis (1894) 21 R 386 per Lord McLaren at p. 387
Q. Is it clear that the truster intended to bind the trustee to carry out the specified purposes
1.2. Transfer
Property must vest
Declaring self as trustee no need to transfer
Mortis causa comes into being on death of truster
1.3. Valid Purpose / Capacity
Trusts can be set up for the protection of the vulnerable
For the benefit of the public
For collective investment purposes
For minimising tax liability
For administering a deceased person’s estate.
How/why?
1.4 . Grounds for Invalidity
Void from uncertainty
Language must not be vague (Sutherland’s trust v Sutherland’s trust (1893))
Ineffective by reason of being overly wide
Reasonable person must be able to determine whether or not any given individual is within or outside the trust

1.4.1. Trust purposes are illegal
Vague purposes
Trustees dispose of property“ in such a way or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    9) Mike transfers securities to an irrevocable trust and gives Rachel the power to determine who will receive the trust's income and assets. Rachel, her estate, and her creditors cannot be beneficiaries or receive the trust assets. Rachel has a general power of appointment.…

    • 9691 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A trustee is a person who holds the assets of a trustee for the benefit of the beneficiaries and manages the trust and its assets under the terms of the trust stated in the Declaration of Trust which created. A fiduciary is legally bound to…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 14 ]. Carey [2007] NSWCA 4, [12], quoting Pennington v Norris (1956) 96 CLR, 16.…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I first learn about “trusts” working in my father’s grocery store. Some customers would come into the store and ask if they could get X or Y to trust. My father would get out this thick book and write the name of the customer and the list of products. He would hand over the product without collecting the money; back then, I was looking for the customer to hand over the money, but he/she would quietly exit the store. This was not good for business, because when he goes to the market place to purchase his goods, he always have to pay for his products. A concept I am still trying to grasp because at age 89, he continue to do the same thing.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trust – The right, enforceable solely in equity, to the beneficial enjoyment of property to which another person holds the legal title; a property interest held by one person (the trustee) at the request of another (the settlor) for the benefit of a third party (the beneficiary). Settlor – Someone who makes a settlement of property; esp., one who sets up a trust. — Also termed creator; donor; trustor; grantor; founder. Beneficiary – Someone who is designated to receive the advantages from an action or change; esp., one designated to benefit from an appointment, disposition, or assignment (as in a will, insurance policy, etc.), or to receive something as a result of a legal arrangement or instrument. The aforementioned terms are commonly understood by attorneys, legal scholars, and laypersons alike. These terms serve as the fundamental base for any trust agreement, providing the instrument, and two of the three key actors within the trust (trustee being the third). On their faces,…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pevar 5

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Understanding the Doctrine of the Trust Responsibility- A legal doctrine that’s has grown of numerous dealings with the United States such as, treaties, court decisions, and statutes. The Trust Responsibility binds the U. S. to protect tribes’ and fund appropriate programs for their economic growth and stability.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Know and be able to apply the reasonable person standard, including knowing what circumstances do and do not affect its application…

    • 5389 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scots Law of Contract

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All of the case studies are concerned with the Law of Contract, specifically the formation of a contract and the differences between an invitation to treat and a contract. We will investigate each consumers’s specific contract or lack thereof individually and advise Bruce on his legal position.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merck & Co. Inc. is one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies in the world for producers of prescription drugs. Merck had sales of 1.98 billion and net income of 307 million in 1978 and continues to steadily rise. Merck invested hundreds of millions of dollars each year in research and allocate the funds amongst various projects. On average it would take approximately 12 years and 200 million dollars to bring a new drug into the market. Many potential drugs offered little chance of financial returns, as some diseases were so rare that treatment could never be priced high enough for the company to recoup the investment. Congress sought to encourage drug companies to further research on rare diseases by proposing tax benefits and seven-year exclusive marketing rights if they manufactured drugs for diseases afflicting fewer than 200,000 Americans. River blindness, also known as “onchocerciasis” is a disease found in over 35 developing countries throughout the Third World. The cause of the disease came from parasitic worm that were carried by black flies. In 1978, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that approximately 340,000 people were blind because of this disease and 18 million or more were infected with the parasite, but not many showed symptoms. Merck researchers have found a compound called ‘Ivermectin’, which has proven to have an astonishing effect against wide range of parasites in animals. Dr. Campbell proposed the idea to have the compound formulated to work against human parasite, but the success rate was very low. Even if the drug was successful attained, the economy viability would be nil and no U.S. or international program would create any incentives for Merck to develop drugs for diseases like river blindness.…

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is the possibility that principle objectives and risks are not fully understood or scrutinised. For example, no gap in control of assurances were identified for the principle risk of the “failure of Foundation Trust application” yet the trust has not attained FT status and is unable to do so in its current…

    • 3701 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    "Plessy v. Ferguson." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 12 May 2015. Web. 27 Apr. 2017.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living Trust

    • 10736 Words
    • 43 Pages

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, Settlor has assigned and delivered, and the Trustee acknowledges receipt of the Trust Fund, in Trust, nevertheless, for the following purposes and under the following terms and conditions:…

    • 10736 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Trust is a partnership which brings the entire organisation together for example schools, police, Family Doctors, Social Workers, and so on. Their aim is to take responsibility for services for children and young people with their families ' to share information, protect and committing to improving children and young people 's lives and each one of them will plan and show how to meet these five outcomes in their area.…

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAWS1061 Exam Notes

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Private – an interference affecting private rights of an individual, specifically concerning the use of their land.…

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quistclose trust

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “My Lords, there are two issues in this appeal. The first is concerned with the nature of the so-­called “Quistclose trust” and the requirements for its creation. The second arises only if the first is answered adversely to the appellant. It is whether his conduct renders him liable for having assisted in a breach of trust.” Lord Millett in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley and Others [2002] 2 AC 164 at paragraph…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays