Preview

Why Have Liberals Supported the Fragmentation of the Power of the State and How Is This Fragmentation to Be Achieved?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Have Liberals Supported the Fragmentation of the Power of the State and How Is This Fragmentation to Be Achieved?
Liberals don’t believe that a balanced and tolerant society will develop naturally out of the free actions of individuals. Liberals fear that free individuals may want to exploit others if it is in their interest to do so. Therefore our liberty requires that they are restrained from encroaching on our freedom and vice versa. Such protection can only be provided by a sovereign state capable of restraining all individuals and groups within society. While liberals are convinced of the need for government they are also aware of the dangers.
All governments are potential tyrannies against the individual as government exercises sovereign power and so poses a constant threat to individual liberty. This reflects a liberal fear of power as humans are self-seeking creatures so they naturally use power for their own benefit and at the expense of others. Liberals believe egoism plus power equals corruption and follow the quote by Lord Acton that ‘power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. Liberals therefore fear arbitrary government and uphold the principle of limited government. Liberals believe government can be limited through the establishment of constitutional constraints and by democracy.
A constitution is a set of rules that govern the government itself and defines the extent of government power and limits its exercise. The power of government bodies and politicians can be limited by external and legal constraints. A codified constitution codifies the major powers and responsibilities of government institutions within a single authorative document. A codified constitution codifies higher law. The first codified constitution was the US constitution but now all liberal democracies have one except for the UK, Israel and New Zealand.
A bill of rights entrenches individual rights by providing a legal definition of the relationship between the individual and the state. This limits government power by limiting their control over the actions of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poli 330 Week 3

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Liberalism is tricky to define since it is divided into classical and modern liberalism. Classical liberalism states that the government should take control of an institution in order to ensure that it continues to be of service to the people, free of charge. Classical liberalism does not see any need for the government to enforce law and order and subjugate its citizens under the iron rule of law and order. In a classical liberalist government you would have Lower taxes and more economic freedom. With that also comes lack of government regulation which would…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal democrats were formed in 1988 from The Social Democrat party, set up by four ex labour members. Currently the liberal democrats have formed a coalition government with the Conservatives. Classical liberals traditionally believe in negative liberty when it comes to state power (The idea that the state should have as little intervention as possible, socially and economically to enhance the freedom and innovation of the individual, therefore not infringing basic, natural rights). Classical Liberals prefer to keep the state to a minimum however with enough framework to provide basic laws prohibiting other regarding actions and to regulate government power. These views where portrayed by many liberal philosophers such as Adam Smith, in regards to economic management; he believed that free trade and free markets where fundamental to successful economic growth, as individuals, consumers and business would create competition and feel confident within the economy. However more modern liberals believe in a form of positive liberty (More state intervention for progression by providing individuals with the tools to create a basic standard of living to develop there social and economic lives, with systems such as welfare) TH green believed there was a need to embrace positive liberty as he stated that individual liberty was only achievable under favourable social and economic circumstances (Creating the welfare system). However today’s contemporary liberal democrats have a combined belief of both positive and negative liberty. There is potential to suggest that there is a contradiction within the lib dems with regards to their position on the state.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights were created so that the government power would have limits. The Bill of Rights Institute says, “Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.” Two examples of the Bill of Right freedoms are that if a person is accused of a crime they have the right to a fair trial. Also people shall never be enslaved in the US.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Framers wrote “securing the blessings of liberty,” it was referring to the freedom to criticize the government or petition it when they disagreed with its policies, in other words it meant our government will make good decisions so that we have the good things about freedom and the future generations have freedom and right as well. Once the constitution was ratified the Bill of Rights were the ten amendments to the constitution that offered numerous limitations on the national government's ability to interfere with personal liberties, now there are 27 amendments.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the nineteenth century several nations in Europe, notably Britain, established liberal oriented governments. Building on the ideas of philosophers like John Locke liberals supported free elections and basic civil rights for men, free trade, representative democracy, fair laws, and the sacredness of private property.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberalists considered that the arbitrary will of a monarch for example,represents a threat to the freedom of the individual.This is believed to be one of the factors that influenced liberals to examine limiting the…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A particular strand of anarchism i.e.- individualist anarchism, shares a similar approach to liberalism. One key similarity is the idea of sovereign individuals, the most radical ideas originating from Max Stirner’s ‘The Ego and His Own’. Like Marx, Stirner was hugely influenced by the works of Hegel, however coming to the conclusion of extreme individualism i.e.- ‘egoism’. Stirner like some liberal thinkers believed in the term ‘egoism’, e.g.- liberal thinkers like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke accepted that individuals are self-interested or self-seeking, as one of the definition of egoism suggests. However, these liberals would then go on to argue that self-interestedness causes conflict, hence the need of a state, going against every anarchist. Like the individual anarchist William Godwin, any restrictions held on an individual is evil, and if those constraints are enforced by the state, then it is absolute evil. Going back to human rationality, much like Mill and other classical liberals, anarchism tends to share the distrust of the state, and the concentrated importance of individual liberty. Where an anarchist argues the state is unnecessary and evil, many liberals believe the individual is rational, that they have reasoning above any collective body. In addition, as humans are self-interested, the state will…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical liberalism is much like individualism. Classical liberalist believes that the government should have a limit and that individual liberty it what matters most. Individual liberty including freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and free markets are all good examples of what classical liberalism would consist of. Classical liberals do not like for the government to interfere with their personal lives. They stress instead reliance on private initiatives or the free market to determine the best outcomes. (p. 3) Classical liberals are individuals who like to put themselves before anything or anyone. Therefore, when I think classical liberalism, I think about a saying my sister always say “let me do me while you do you”. Classical liberals do not trust the government 100%, but they respect the government.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When James Madison put in the Bill of Rights he had explained that it was suppose to limit the power of government. It would provide a second limitation on the power of government. The Bill of Rights is more than just a way to generally limit the power of the federal government; the rights protected by the Bill of Rights were those that were most effective in empowering people to control and limit their government. Not only did the Bill of Rights create limitations on government, but it specifically identified areas of freedom which, when exercised, could further help to limit…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy which emphasizes on the rights of an individual, and usually the rights will assure by the government. Liberalism has turned up for around 300 years, and the complexity to explain and define liberalism is increasing as there are several forms, including classical liberalism, neo-liberalism, conservative liberalism, social liberalism, libertarianism and libertarian socialism (Mastin, 2008). Although anarchism, communism, democratic socialism, social democracy, communitarianism and liberal conservatism have the same objective with liberalism which support for democracy as well as basic equality and against authoritarianism, but it does not consider as liberalism (Haar, 2015).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TheBillOfRights

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Bill of Rights was very important at the time it was enacted. It established freedom of expression, which generated a popular understanding of American freedom. It also ensured that people are important because it protects their rights as well as their freedom. The freedoms of speech and of the press were among the most important because they were building blocks of a democratic public sphere. The Bill of Rights became a set of laws that spoke about every citizen in the United States.…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressive Reform

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    of as the problem, but was instead a major part of the progressive’s solution. In the beginning…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a government that follows the classical liberal concept, feel like there’s to many ways in which individuals can infringe on others rights and deny them of their freedoms. With government intervention in a government that runs under the expansive liberty put forward by modern liberalism I feel like there is no such problems. Everyone is granted their freedom and their rights are…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays