Preview

True Measure Of Our Commitment To Justice: Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
True Measure Of Our Commitment To Justice: Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson
"The true measure of our commitment to justice… cannot be measured by how we treat the rich, the powerful, the privileged, and the respected among us. The true measure of our character is how we treat the poor, the disfavored, the accused, the incarcerated, and the condemned”. Bryan Stevenson (Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption). Bryan Stevenson reveals the true foundations of a just and fair society, yet when applied to the United States we fail to meet the expectations of a reasonable society. Ever since the Enlightenment, it has been posited that human beings have inherent, inalienable rights when they are born, and yet the War on Drugs has stripped minorities of their inalienable human rights. The War on Drugs has disproportionately …show more content…
After getting incarcerated, minorities face felony disenfranchisement laws. The African Americans that end up getting arrested, also lose their right to vote. Unfairly targeted minorities lose the fundamental right that makes them an American citizen in the U.S. democracy. The drug war has instead become an attack on civil liberties. Expert Sayaka Fukumi states “At the height of the War on Drugs, Americans were willing to sacrifice their own civil liberties… they even approved of extreme measures”. The loss of civil liberties is destroying the U.S. democracy, it has reached the point where “the United States is the only democracy in the world to deprive its citizens of the right to vote after they have completed their sentences”. This deprivation of voting leads to a misrepresentation in the government where the same politicians that support drug war policies become entrenched within the system. Consequently from the disenfranchisement and incarceration, blacks lose their social mobility with prospects of future employment and income dismal. Graham Boyd sadly claims how “the drug war is the new Jim …show more content…
The fearmongering rhetoric of the War on Drugs has jacked up the price of security in the United States. American society has become desensitized to the common systemic rights abuses caused by the War on Drugs that we now accept them as everyday practice to stop drug abuse. Furthermore, the method that the War on Drugs uses to approach the drug problem is inherently flawed. With status quo means, the War on Drugs is unwinnable. The approach taken to end drug abuse is completely ignores the economics of the War on Drugs. The War on Drugs only targets the supply chain of drugs, however without solving the issue of demand, there will always be more suppliers to meet the constant demand. A policy proposal to solve the enduring problem of drug abuse is the four pillars drug strategy. This four main principles it focuses on are prevention, treatment, harm reduction, and enforcement. This strategy would not focus on tracking and destroying drugs, but would rather focus on the treatment of drug abusers, subsequently leading to their reintegration into society. This proposal creates more treatment and rehabilitation centers which would provide drugs and safe injection sites for the drug abusers. Although, this method seems counterintuitive, it allows for the drug abusers to focus on other aspects of their life and dealing with their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Extra credit: SOCI 2201 Name: Lauryn Tonou Sociological analysis of “The House I Live In” The incarceration system in the country has become predicated on economics rather than justice. Drug abuse is not a crime against the society, it is mainly medical as problem. Ethnic and racial prejudice rooted social control in American anti-drug policy. Those are arguments deftly assembled in the documentary by Eugene Jarecki with assistance from David Simon, former crime reporter.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the chapter the author explains the way that the system works, and she points out ways that the drug war frequently functions to undermine many civil liberties. She further demonstrates how people who commit minor offenses, and in far too many cases, people who are innocent become involved in the criminal justice system.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sirin writes that her article “investigates presidential progress in addressing racial injustices and disparities within the context of the war on drugs” and argues that the possibility for racial justice depends on a progressive president choosing its pursuit as a personal agenda. Sirin examines the drug policies of presidents from Richard Nixon to Barack Obama, and when discussing President Reagan, she gives him responsibility for the “punitive policies that disproportionately affected certain racial/ethnic groups” found in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. She underscores his advocacy for federal mandatory minimum sentences, which created “the notorious 100 to 1 provision” under which five grams of crack cocaine carried the same prison sentence, five years, as 500 grams of powder cocaine. After explaining that crack cocaine users were typically poor and black, she notes that the resulting racial disparity in sentencing stayed in place until President Obama’s Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Sirin clarifies that a progressive president will struggle without the legislature, judiciary, or public opinion, but she still holds that “most importantly, the president in office should have a progressive agenda to begin with in order to initiate and work towards key structural changes and policy reforms.” For this reason, according to her estimation, the president defines drug…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and mass incarceration have had a deep connection since the start of the Clinton administration. Not to undermine the the incarceration efforts of previous administrations, but Clinton’s had a specifically terrible impact. Previous administrations- like Nixon’s and Reagan’s- used subtle contexts as a political strategy to win the votes from the south. After the rage left over from the loss of slavery, political leaders needed to find alternate ways to control minority groups, legally, to gain the southern vote. The Nixon administration coined with the idea of evil drugs being present in black and hispanic communities, persuading the American public that harsher laws should be taken to put these people in place. The Jim Crow laws…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, Michelle Alexander examines our current criminal justice system and the mass incarceration of African Americans in the United States. She argues that the War on Drugs and drug offense convictions are the single most compelling cause for the magnitude of people of color behind bars. Prisons are used as a system of racial and social control that function in the same way as Jim Crow laws. It is no longer legal to discriminate against people based on race. By targeting black and minority communities through the War on Drugs and labeling them as felons, all the old forms of discrimination became legal. The racial caste systems of slavery and Jim Crow have not disappeared, but…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s society is known as the “Era of Color Blindness.” The war on drugs from the past to the future has not changed according to Michelle Alexander. The previous Jim Crowe law may be eradicated, but the law was brought back into effect by former president Ronald Reagan, known as the “War on Drugs.” The war on drugs that was put into effect by Ronald Reagan was targeted to lower class communities that had a violent crime rate. Focusing on the “Drug War” took light off a pressing issue known as racial caste in America by making harsher punishments for people who used or sold drugs. Even though the focus was in lower class communities it was also just as common in the middle to upper class communities. The “War on Drugs”…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past two years, drug violence has become a fixture of the daily news. Some of this violence pits drug cartels against one another; some involves confrontations between law enforcement and traffickers. Recent estimates suggest that thousands have lost their lives in this “war on drugs.” Prohibition creates violence because it drives the drug market underground. This means buyers and sellers cannot resolve their disputes in orderly ways, so they turn to violence instead. The only way to reduce violence there fore is to legalize drugs. Fortuitously, legalization is the right policy for a slew of other reasons. If drugs were legal, the consequent unemployment could cause economic problems; but in contrast it could reduce violence and produce great opportunities for economic development (Borden 44). The right policy, therefore, is to legalize drugs while using regulation and taxation to dampen irresponsible behavior related to drug use, such as driving under the influence. This makes more sense than prohibition because it avoids creation of a black market. This approach also allows those who believe they benefit from drug use to do so, as long as they do not harm others. Magazine Publisher, David Borden said, “I argued, prohibition fuels violence and disorder, particularly in the inner cities, and these conditions drive away business and make every other method of addressing poverty far more…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultimately the new “war on drugs” had a negative impact on American life during the mid 1980s-early 2000s due to the economic costs, the strain put on our justice system, and the civil liberty violations that occurred. As with any other war or bureaucratic endeavor, money must be heavily drawn upon and invested. When discussing the overall cost of this “war” through this time, congressman Lee Hamilton stated that, “Federal and local governments spend over $3 billion each year to fight drugs.” (cite) In his quote it becomes apparent that the United States had become highly invested and arguably obsessed in a seemingly impossible “war.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are over millions of people incarcerated but African Americans and Latinos make up most of the prison population. To attempt to stop certain problems, the criminal justice system just put people behind bars and expects that everything will be fine, when in reality it isn’t because now the jails are becoming overcrowded. Dealing with the drug war, racial profiling, and people growing up in low-income neighborhoods and high-poverty rates, minorities have a higher inmate ratio but the drug war is the greatest cause of why the minority inmate ratio is so high.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    New Jim Crow Laws

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From the 1880s into the 1960s, a majority of American states enforced segregation through "Jim Crow" laws. From Delaware to California, and from North Dakota to Texas, many states could impose legal punishments on people for consorting with members of another race. The most common types of laws forbade intermarriage and ordered business owners and public institutions to keep their black and white clientele separated. The overall point of the laws were to keep blacks oppressed. It is hard to believe that something like this could still be going on, but it is. Today in the era of “colorblindness”, the system of mass incarceration has emerged as a strikingly comprehensive and well-disguised…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I intend to talk about the repeated effect of the drug war. Forty years ago, the world declared war on drugs. Today, after decades of failing to adequately control drug consumption, an even greater problem has emerged: violent drug traffickers have taken the industry hostage and will stop at nothing to preserve their power. ( Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies;Summer2011, Vol.18 Issue 2, p901-927, 27p). Drug trafficking is the most widespread and lucrative organized crime operation in the United States, with an annual income estimated to be as high as 110…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet people in law enforcement and local communities are not convinced for good reasons. Although casual illegal drugs use appears to fluctuate and may have declined in recent years, the regular usage of these drugs has not. The government warning about how dangerous these are, such as; heroin, marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine only confuse matter further. Actually, such warning are an indication that these drugs are unwinnable. Production sources , smuggling techniques, purity price and use patterns have changed through the years in dynamic drugs markets as governments has made claims of progress, but the war on drugs that began in 1914 has no end in…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Jim Crow

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In today’s modern world, many people would be surprised to find out that there is still a racial caste system in America. After witnessing the election of a black president, people have started believing that America has entered a post-racial society. This is both a patently false and dangerous mindset. The segregation and stigma of race is still very much alive in our society. Instead of a formalized institution such as slavery or Jim Crow, America has found a new way to continue the marginalization of blacks by using the criminal justice system. In Michelle Alexander’s book “ The New Jim Crow”, she shows how America’s “ War on Drugs “ has become a tool of racial segregation and how the discretionary enforcement of drug laws has resulted in an overwhelmingly negative affect on its black population.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our society is in need of true social reform in order to limit crime, and limit racial and class divides. The War on Drugs has done nothing but being ineffective and is not fair to people of color or to people in a lower class. The War on Drugs has actually been very counterproductive because not only has it ignored the true problems in our society, but it has labeled drug offenders as “evil”. In reality, that is just another prejudice being reinforced through old legislation. In fact, that particular prejudice can even be one of the reasons behind mass incarceration. Many of the offenders in prison today are low ranking drug offenders. Once legislation is put into place by the politicians addressing the true social problems in our country, issues of mass incarceration and false burdening of police can be solved. The way to begin will be for political pressures in the U.S. demanding a new stance on crime. A stance that is neither “law and order”, or “tough on crime”. This is because average crime is not committed for fun, but is committed due to problems that are buried deeply within our political system and started by politicians. A problem started by politicians, should not be blamed on figures who are meant to serve and protect U.S. citizens each and every day. That blame is just another reason for the fearful misinterpretation of those in positions of authority within our…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays