You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1) Realistically, a physical impression of a person most likely predisposes a negative or positive outcome from a jury because what they see in front of them marks the initial idea of who the defendants are. The Press had already misrepresented, in a negative light, to the world the Pachucos and Zoot Suit people. Henry’s statement, “They’re trying to make us look bad,” confirms the fact that the judge and prosecutors, for their benefit, desire that the boys reflect the negative image that correlates with the Pachucos. (54)…
- 182 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Many people in society can be considered by outsiders by society. These sorts of characters, along with being found in modern day society, are also found in all forms of media such as Scott Pilgrim in Scott Pilgrim Versus the World, Colonel Aureliano Buendia from One Hundred Years of Solitude, and even Doctor Gregory House from acclaimed television series House. These characters provide us with a fascinating viewpoint on how they view society and how they are able to interact with society as a result of this isolation and ostracism from society. Arguably one of the greatest examples of this isolated character challenged by society’s very moral center is the character of Meursault of Albert Camus’ The Stranger. Camus throughout The Stranger…
- 1333 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
It is inevitable that the jurors own personal experiences affect their opinion on the innocence of the defendant. It is these personal experiences, which threaten the defendants right to ‘a fair trial’ at the danger of a juror’s personal bias ‘obscur[ing] the truth.’ Juror 3 is depicted as the juror with the most prejudice throughout the play, consistent with the vote of ‘guilty’ as he relates the defendant to his own son who he describes as a ‘rotten kid.’ This illustrates the danger that personal bias has on the justice system, as the defendant is being adjudicated by juror 3 on his age and gender rather than the merits of the case. Prejudice is also displayed by juror 10 who see’s the accused as ‘trash’ due to his ‘slums’ background, this…
- 1008 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The trial draws on a rather bleak image of humanity the crime in question is first degree murder most serious charge tried in our courtroom’ the victim is not portrayed as innocent but as a ‘tough, cruel, primitive kind of man’ the lawyers on the case too are described as not doing their job properly and lacking the motivation to investigate the possibilities…
- 559 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1) How does Meursault explain to the lawyer how his “physical needs” relate to his “feelings”? How is this significant to our understanding of Meursault?…
- 684 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Albert Camus creates a paradoxical situation in The Stranger that seamlessly meshes pleasure with disquietude. Meursault’s moral development solidifies his “strangerhood” in society, but that realization solidifies his moral development. However, this epiphanic moment, while transformative to one’s view of the novel, only reveals itself after several other moments of disquietude.…
- 425 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
1950s America saw the nation fall into a period of national tension and idealogical turmoil following the McCarthy Trials and the Cold War, which produced a flourish of works such as Regnald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men.’ Using a jury of twelve anonymous men, the play scrutinizes both the strengths and flaws of the American judicial system. The case of a fictional “delinquent” who faces capitol punishment under charges of patricide acts as a vehicle to examine the moral dilemma of prejudice and judgement, and its importance, underpinning American jury rooms in a time of profound social division. Through his structuring and characterizations, Rose does not merely attack the system, but contends is functionality stems from the very individuals within it, and their ability to see with objectivity and compassion.…
- 1096 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Albert Camus wrote The Stranger in such a way that enabled the reader to analyze the main character, Meursault, and perceive him in their own way. Meursault is characterized as emotionless and independent. Meursault can connect well to the statement, Through the critical lens of Roethke, “In a dark time the eye begins to see.” —Theodore Roethke, because Camus created a character that enabled the reader to form a changing opinion of Meursault. From the world in which Meursault narrates, the reader can definitely understand why he attempts to find understanding in his life when he is exiled at the end of the novel.…
- 684 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Another way to look at it is that, throughout the book, Meursault would express his hatred for humanity’s culture of mourning and think of it as crazy. He is adverse towards people who torture themselves over someone else’s death.…
- 509 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Prejudice is seen as one crucial issue in constituting a verdict for the jury, as two of the jurors are biased against the suspect of the murder. Language and characterisation of the jurors is crucial techniques in which Reginald uses to convey the bitterness of one of the jurors, Juror #10. In the play, he states “Look, you know how these people lie! It's born in them!” halfway through the play, displaying his racial prejudice towards the suspect of murder; generalising slum people as those who “…you cannot trust”. The use of characterisation and speech, allows the audience to recognise the prejudice in the jury some that is justifiable. Tension is also another dramatic technique used to convey the Juror #3 bias against the boy because of his own relationship with his son who “…didn’t know how to fight”. This technique shows the conflicts between him and Juror #8; every time Juror #8 brings up an argument, Juror #3 always rebuts with biased statements, bringing the tension up. However, this tension is always brought down by some a change in stage direction. Shown in ACT II, Juror #2 “moves to the window” after arguing with Juror #8; allowing the play’s audience to perceive Juror #8 as someone who is not biased against the murder suspect, displaying him as someone who was doing the right thing.…
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In contrast, the play also highlights potential flaws in the jury system, where prejudice obstructs the pursuit of justice. This is supported by the 3rd Juror's reluctance to change his initial 'guilty' verdict and the manner in which he characterises, 'kids...nowadays. Angry! Hostile!'. This…
- 641 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the story “The Stranger” by Albert Camus, the belief that the themes of loss and retrieval are at the core of Mersault’s mythology, and that they illumine the notion of exile to which he returns so often is widely discussed. I however do not believe that either one of those themes has anything to do with the Mersault and the exile to which he returns to so often, rather I believe that Mersault’s own attitude is the reason for the exile he experiences in the story.…
- 955 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Trusting: p. 33 "I got up. Raymond gave me a very firm handshake and said that men always understand each other.”…
- 363 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Much of Meursault’s life is similar to that of Camus’ life. They were both born in the same region of Africa and in the same country.…
- 1253 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
What is justice? Is it when a person’s demise makes society feel better? Or is it when a suspect gets acquitted of all charges brought against him? Wherever there is justice there is obscurity. No matter how it is looked at, there is no real justice in the judicial system. In Albert Camus “The Stranger” the narrator, Meursault, is being trialed for the murder of a man he encounters at the beach. At his trial, the prosecutor makes much of Meursault’s demeanor and the prosecutor focuses on irrelevant information like Meursault’s failure to properly show grief at his own mother’s recent funeral. The prosecutor based the trial on events which had taken place prior to the murder. Even though, his points did not have the connection with the murder which the prosecution maintained. Therefore, the prosecutor created an unfair trial, by not giving Meursalt adequate time to speak in his own defense, bringing up irrelevant situations such as his relationship with his mother and his beliefs. Meursault was not given the chance to defend himself because of questions from the prosecutor and lack of knowledge of his lawyer. The case was rather built upon his lack of feelings towards his mother’s death and his choice not to believe in God.…
- 1061 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays