Preview

The Mongols: How Barbaric Were The Barbarians?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Mongols: How Barbaric Were The Barbarians?
Mongol Essay
The Mongols: How Barbaric Were the “Barbarians”?” The Mongols did accomplish a lot as an Empire. But, as they accomplished what they wanted, they were completely barbaric groups of people. In the 13th century, the Mongols warriors swept across the lands of Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. “Nothing like it had ever been seen before. Nothing quite like it was has been done ever since.” ( Quote from Article:“The Mongols: How Barbaric Were the“Barbarians”?”). The “great” leader of Temuchin all started in his early childhood when his father, the original leader of the Mongols, was poisoned to death by a local enemy. Temuchin spent his childhood and teenage years fighting clan rivals. Temuchin later became the leader of the Mongol army and was a great leader. Later on in his life, he was given the name Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan and his army took its first serious target, the Chin Armies of North China. Him
…show more content…
The way they treated their prisoners were very brutal and barbaric. Some of the things they did to the people would throw them into big pots of water and boil them to death with scorching hot water. Another killing tactic was they would berry prisoners upside down, making their blood rush straight to their head. Genghis Khan killed his blood brother went they went to war against each other, blood brother comes to Genghis Khan and whispers to him in his ear, give me a noble death. Within moments, Genghis Khan kills his blood brother by breaking his back. A last tactic they would do to treat prisoners would be just flat out shooting them with their armies Mongol archers. To conclude the question of “The Mongols: How Barbaric Were the “Barbarians”?”. The evidence shows that they were very cruel in ways. Whether it's the death count or the way they treated the captured, killing them by boiling them to death or giving Temuchin’s blood brother a noble death by breaking his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Out of many conquerors, the Mongols were the most barbaric empire wise. In document 1, it shows that the Barbarians conquered almost five million square miles of land throughout their reign. This shows that they would go through any means to achieve their goals. To conquer many large, neighboring empires, the Mongols would have had an outstanding army to do all of these tasks. Compared to the other conquerors the…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mongols DBQ

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mongols, who eventually became known as the Tatars, were one of the most savage conquerors of history. The Mongols had good military tactics, that’s how they conquered many so fast. They were very clever in their battles and planned ahead. They didn’t act until they had plenty of men or when they had…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mongols were very barbaric, their reputation was not pretty, they slaughtered entire cities and left one person alive so they could tell the terrible story.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongol army went into battle with a brutal well planned tactic with the intent of causing maximum damage, “I’ll trick them and make them come out in the open. I’ll pretend to retreat and when they come out I’ll attack them,” this contributed greatly to the success of the Mongols (Doc: 1). Marco Polo’s biased description the soldiers stuck out from the documents “their arms are bows, iron maces, and in some instances, spears” (Doc: 3). The fact that Polo was sent by the Mongol ruler to administer the realm contributes to this bias. The warriors of the Mongol army were disciplined “their obedience and submissiveness is such that if there be a commander of a hundred thousand between whom and the Khan there is a distance of sunrise and sunset, and if he but commit some fault, the Khan dispatches a single horseman to punish him” (Doc: 4). A document from the perspective of one of the conquered civilizations would be very useful because it would give insight on how events took place.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question was are the Mongols uncivilized barbarians or culture brokers on their journey to conquer the world? They served mainly as culture brokers in many ways. They helped evolve trade, spread religion, and share many cultures with others,…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barbaric Dbq Analysis

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, the Mongols were considered barbaric. They had high murder tolls, participated in the destruction of villages, and in the destruction of marriages. They believed in taking control of everything, and killing the people who didn’t follow what they did and believed in. They could have been called a Communist government, but really there was no need for a government for people who killed for world…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 12th century, the great ruler Temujin, soon to be known as Genghis Khan, arose. He fought to join clans, and become Khan, or ruler. New strategies and ideas were enforced after having Genghis Khan as ruler such as tribal cavalry, and mobile tactical teams in the military. Over the next three decades, he led a constant military…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A picture of a Mongol horse-mounted bowman demonstrates how skilled these soldiers were in their combat. We can assume the artist admires the Mongols method of fighting by their interpretation of a skilled archer turning a full 180 degrees to shoot an arrow, all while riding a horse. If the time period of Mongol conquest matches closely to the time the painting was done, we can mark this source as reliable. Marco Polo recorded in 1298 about his travels eight years before when first handedly seeing the Mongols army. “They are brave in battle, almost to desperation, setting little value upon their lives, and exposing themselves without hesitation to all manner of danger… No people on earth can surpass them in fortitude under difficulties, nor show greater patience under wants of every kind. They are most obedient to their chiefs, and are maintained at small expense.”. Though this is an eyewitness account, we are forced to question on its reliability since it wasn’t written down until eight years later. This document is unbiased because it was observed and written by a person who was neither Mongol nor a Mongol enemy. A biased record of admiration is present in the document written by Juvaini, a high ranked official of the Mongol who shortly after writing this document was appointed as the governor of Baghdad. He states, “For they have divided all the people into companies of ten,…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Genghis Khan: Military HeroAlthough some people believe Genghis Khan was a ruthless butcher, he deserves credit as a military genius because he conquered massive amounts of territory thanks to his quick thinking and battle tactics. To the Mongolian 's he is a much honored figure, a king and hero rather than a savage, a force of unity, strength and order. He was the man who ruled Mongolia in its greatest days of glory, and although he led an army that slaughtered masses of people in a genocide not seen again until the 20th century, he was known for being just and generous to his own people, and magnanimous in victory. Undeniably, he was one of histories greatest rulers and military leaders. Genghis Khan established the Mongol nation, conquered most of the known world, and rightfully earned the reputation…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although taking a harsher approach to conquering China, the Mongols’ barbarity does not compare to the impact they have made improving the country. The leader of the Mongols, Genghis Khan, had only one objective to bring the Mongol clans of the region under one leadership. Years later, his grandson, Kubilai Khan, maintained ties with other khanates achieving security across much of Asia. This period is called pax Mongolica or “the Mongolian peace.” Kubilai expanded his holdings in China by defeating the Sung Empire and establishing a new dynasty called the Yuan Dynasty. For the first time in three hundred years China was once again a united country. The Mongols were a very strong empire and through their…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Were The Barbarians Dbq

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The barbarians seem to be very barbaric. The term barbaros was the greek word for foreigners. The word barbaric means “evil”, they had an organized army. The barbarians were a nomadic group of people.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    MONGOLS DBQ

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Complied along the Mongols Oral Tradition, in the 13th century, they included The Secret History of Mongols that had the information on the traditions and tactics that were used during the Mongol invasions of Chu-yung Kuan. This gives us a sense of how trickery and tactics used during the Mongol period. The Secret History of Mongols was most likely written by the Mongols during the time of raids and attacks on other landholders, because it was written by the Mongols it may have given a tone that was favorable to the Mongols. As Mongols, they sought these tactics to be witty and were proud of these achievements and tactics (doc. 1). The Monks in Novgorod wrote The Chronicles of Novgorod that explained the killing of raids and attacks upon Novgorod near Russia. They sought these Mongols to be monstereous and heartless with their violence due to their random killing of good men and women including priests and nuns. These monks described the Mongols terrifying. As monks, it’s all about peace and serenity and when the raid happened seeing their good friends being priests or nuns killed affected the to speak with hatred and discontent towards the Mongols describing them as killers, monsters and killing for no reason (doc. 2). Additional documents like the specific tactics used such as terror tactics or perhaps a journal written by a Mongol soldier during the fighting and how he thought of himself when tricking poor men into…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongols as Villians

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genghis Khan was loved mostly by peasants and the poor solely because he was able to give them more riches. He treated them very well. Because the majority of people in that time period were poor, he was loved more than he was hated. The rich hated him because he took their money and other riches for his own profit. Genghis Khan’s army of Mongols was greatly known for their advanced abilities in archery. They were also successful in biological warfare during the Siege of Caffa in 1346 were they catapulted dead plague ridden bodies of animals and human over their borders. In the 12th and 13th centuries, Mongols were known for boiling defeated khans rather than killing them by swords. This was known as one of the most cruel and most painful ways to die.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Genghis Khan Bad

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many people see Genghis Khan as a violent and brutal person since he had destroyed many villages as well as people. However, I believe that Genghis Khan has done much more good than bad and therefore, I believe he was more of a hero than a villain. To start off, Genghis Khan created the largest empire that has ever existed and was able to unite nomadic tribes in Mongolia which was a huge accomplishment. On top of that, Genghis Khan would improve the cities and countries he would conquer and make it a much better place. For instance, when Genghis Khan went to China, he centralized the government there, modernized the tax system, and got the grand canal rebuilt. Similarly, when Genghis went to Russia, he improved a lot of things there as well.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1889-1945 Adolf Hitler ruled but only conquered 1370,000 square miles, about one fourth of what Genghis had conquered. Due to the fact that the Mongol Empire had a great number of citizens, stretching from the pacific ocean to the Mediterranean sea, it was a difficult empire to peacefully control. Having order in the empire was impossible after the split into khanates, four parts of the Mongol Empire, which include, the Russian khanate, the Persian khanate, the central Asian khanate, and the Khanate of Great Khan. Since each khanate had difficulty when it came to passing information to each other, not all information was valid. For example, if the Russian khanate had information that needed to be passed on to the central Asian khanate through the Persian khanate, the Persian khanate could have heard the information wrong which could have resulted in the central Asian khanate receiving false information. Because of the fact that the empire was extremely large, the Mongols were…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays