Preview

Supreme Court of the United States

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court of the United States
|Name: |Date: 2/10/13 |

Graded Assignment

Korematsu v. the United States (1944)

Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions.

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?

Answer: After Pearl Harbor, FDR issued Executive Order 9066, which said that all Japanese Americans were to be put into internment camps. Instead of following this, he became a fugitive. His conviction for disobeying that order led to a test of the order's legality before the United States Supreme Court in Korematsu v. United States.

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?

Answer: They thought they would try to help the Japanese by spying on the United States and giving the Japanese information.

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

3. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?

Answer: In the state of war.

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

4. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities?

Answer: They did not approve. The Fifth Amendment's command that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, both of these constitutional safeguards were denied by military action under Executive Order 9066.

(2 points)

|Score |
| |

5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact that Japanese

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    4. I disagree with this court decision because I think this was a violation of the fourteenth amendment made by the Supreme Court. I understand why the justices decided as they did, but their duty was…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. What rights did the students believe had been violated? What is the relevant wording of the First Amendment?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Order 906 Essay

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Executive Order 9066 was put into place on February 19, 1942 by President Franklin Roosevelt which was just as a few months after Japan had attacked America on Pearl Harbor. Executive Order 9066, “...which authorized sending all Americans of Japanese descent to ten makeshift internment camps…”(Roark, Pg.834), was established in order to prevent an internal attack from the Japanese on American soil. Since Roosevelt wanted America secure from the potential risk of Japanese Americans as quickly as possible, the Japanese lost a great deal of their property and with that the majority of their money. Although Roosevelt was ordering Japanese American citizens into internment camps, this was still considered constitutional since…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Korematsu V Us

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During World War II, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed Executive Order 9066 which allowed the Secretary of War to declare certain areas as "military zones" and gave the military power over the attorney general. These newly declared military zones were made in the western US and were areas "from which any or all persons could be excluded". Although the document does not specify any races or ethnic groups, later orders issued that all people of Japanese decent (even American citizens) were excluded from these military zones that included all of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii. The Japanese in these areas were forced to evacuate to Internment Camps; where they could only bring what they could carry with them and where they would stay until further notice. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen (American born) who decided to stay at his home in California during this time and was arrested for the violation of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Korematsu challenged his arrest and the case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was questioned if Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu's 14th and 5th amendment rights (right to equal protection under the law and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness). The court also questioned if Korematsu's constitutional rights were allowed to be violated due to the special circumstances of war. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government by ruling that the government was permitted to deny the Japanese of their constitutional rights because of military considerations, and that such exclusion was not beyond the war powers of congress and the president since it was done with national security in mind. Almost 40 years later after serving his sentence, Korematsu brought his case back to court filing for a writ of Coram Nobis to correct the previous ruling and achieve justice. Korematsu won this…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II, a time of confusion and fear settled around America. Previously respected and average everyday citizens became feared and outcast by most people in the United States. “All citizens alike, both in and out of uniform feel the impact of war in greater or lesser measure (Justice Hugo Black).” The government declared that all the people of Japanese descent living along the Pacific coast be sent to live in concentration camps where the living arrangements were not the most pleasant and were overcrowded.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roosevelt stated: “Yesterday, December 7th, 1941 -- a date which will live in infamy -- the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.”(Document C). At this point in time the United States was at peace with Japan, but that all ended when Pearl Harbor was bombed. We were drug into a war with Japan and eventually this lead us to fight in the second world war. The president only wanted to protect from further harm so he rounded up the Japanese Americans and sent them to internment camps. He justly did this to prevent, protect, and defuse any more problems during the war on…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Japanese Internment was a completely justified and strategical move based upon the destruction and fear brought by the attack on Pearl Harbor, the deception and betrayal the Japanese stretched upon us, and the evidence and beliefs against the Japanese such as the stereotype presented in document 3 or the 50 to 60 dangerous Japanese soldiers in each…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Roe V. Wade 410 U.S. 113 (1973) and docket number 70-18. The petitioner in this particular case was wade and the respondent was Roe heard by the Burger Court (1971-1972).…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Explain the circumstances leading to the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act. Why was its passage both pivotal and problematic?…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This investigation assesses the extent to which Japanese American internment from 1942 to 1946 was a violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which declares that, “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The question must be asked in order to examine the legality of the actions taken by the US government in opposition to American citizens of Japanese extraction (Nisei) and their immigrant parents (Issei). To determine this, the scope of this investigation will concentrate on the reasons for internment and the conditions in which the Japanese people lived during 1942 and 1946, particularly in a camp called Manzanar. One method applied is to explore an oral history interview…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Free Soil Party

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    31. According to the principle of “popular sovereignty,” the question of slavery in the territories would be determined by…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays