Preview

Ramon Flores's Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ramon Flores's Case Summary
On May 24, 1992, Ramon Flores was working at a gas station that was getting robbed and was shot and killed. The man charged with his murder was Michael R. Pulido. He was charged with first degree murder along the felony murder law. That law states that killing during the act of a felony, in this case a robbery, is automatically first degree murder. The way I have interpreted the facts of this case, the defendant was the one who pulled the trigger and point toward him as the killer. To come to this decision, the jury had to conclude that the defendant had intent to commit a felony, killed during the act of a dangerous felony, and that the victims death was a foreseeable outcome of the felony. Ramon Flores was working the night shift, as cashier, at the shell gas station on May 24, 1992, in San Mateo, CA. Between the time of 1 a.m. and 5:30 am. Michael Pulido entered the gas station where Ramon worked and bought a can of coke, then shot him in the face with a 45 caliber colt handgun, killing him instantly. He then took the cash register. A witness told police detectives that around 3:45 a.m., he heard a loud bang, and yelling coming from the gas station. The witness could not make out what the yelling was about. The stolen cash register was found in bushes, along a roadside the next morning in San Mateo. Michael …show more content…
In this case it was obvious that armed robbery is a dangerous felony. However, the fact that Pulido killed the victim before the money was taken could give the defense the argument that, maybe Pulido had beef with his victim. The killing could have been due to some long standing grudge or other issue. The only problem is the testimony of Pulidos Uncle that showed the defendants intent to rob the gas station first. The court could then come to the conclusion that the killing occurred during the armed robbery of the gas

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Candidate Estrada, M. received the obstacle brief and only asked two question in order to clarify what he had missed. SNC wasted little time completing his notes and assessed the obstacle for a few moments before he briefed his team. His brief consisted of all the parts of the 5 paragraph order; however, he displayed lack of confidence in his tone of voice and gave a confusing brief that bounced around the 5 paragraph order. His decision making was slow during the execution and this was displayed through lack of communication to his team. SNC did not listen to the coordinating instructions very well, as he added they could not touch an area of the obstacle that was authorized, which was part of a previous scenario. The minimal communication…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When a case is appealed, as in Mr. Ewing’s case, other cases of like offenses and sentencing are looked at to see if any type of discrepancy or bias can be found. The cases e.g. Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S.957 (1991), Solem v. Helm, 463 U. S. 277(1983), and Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U. S. 263 (1980), that were selected to be part of the review process for Mr. Ewing case were similar but upon review, Mr. Ewing was found to be much more violent in his overall scope, e.g. felonies and prior offenses which included the use of weapons, and therefore, his here strikes sentence was upheld. (Ewing v. California,…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathew Shepard Case Brief

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On April 5, 1999, 22 year old, Aaron McKinney was found guilty of felony murder, second-degree murder, kidnapping and robbery. 21 year old, Russell Henderson pled guilty to kidnapping and felony murder and was sentenced to two consecutive life terms. Two women described as the suspects girlfriends, Chasity Vera Pasley (20) and Krista Lean Price (18) were charged as accessories after the fact of first-degree murder (The Data Lounge, Issues 2000, [on-line]).…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All three of the boys should have been charged for what happened the night of January 18th. Weather they be charged for being there and taking place at the night of the murder or providing weapons. Using the evidence that was at the crime scene could have clearly helped Miguel Martinez receive a smaller sentence, and justify putting the other two boys in jail as well. I also believe that the police and maybe even the DAs office could have tampered with the evidence being lost or…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal issue in question (on appeal) is whether the defendants can claim the self-defense defense. The defendants wish to claim this defense because Agent Wallie Howard had opened fire on them during the third cocaine “buy-bust” deal.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To research this scenario, One must look to the elements of Criminal Attempt-Murder. Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with intention and malicious aforethought. (USLegal INC, 2010) Criminal Attempt requires three things; an intent or purpose to commit a particular crime, an overt act toward accomplishing that target crime, and a failure to complete the target crime. (Lippman, 2007) In this scenario, Jack approached the car with the intent to shooting and killing Bert, obvious malice aforethought. Upon arriving, he shot at the two occupants, striking and killing Pratt. When he attempted to complete the act on Bert, the gun jammed and he was unable to accomplish the criminal act against Bert, and Jack fled.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case Gonzales v. Raich, Angel Raich, which is from California, was charged with home-grown, non-commercial use of medical marijuana. Raich has inoperable brain tumor, seizures, and chronic pain disorders. Raich has been prescribed medical marijuana 5 years before the cases even came up in court. Raich has to depend on 2 caregivers to grow the medical marijuana for her because of her condition.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The verdict of this case in my opinion is guilty but insane. I believe he knew that the action was wrong as he admitted that he had the premeditation to kill the police officer as well getting rid of his weapon. To me this indicated that he knew his actions were wrong, plus by fleeing the scene. If I were ruling this case, I would recommend that this particular criminal be admitted to an institution so he can be treated and…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, William Furman committed a robbery of a private home. The resident of the home awoke to find Furman in his house. Furman tried to escape and while doing so, he tripped and fired his gun accidently, which killed the victim. He was taken to trial and found guilty of murder. Because the shooting occurred during the commission of a felony, Furman was eligible for the death penalty according to the felony murder rule. The rule of felony murder states that if an offender kills, with or without intention, during a dangerous crime, they are guilty of murder. Furman was sentenced to death but the case was taken to the Supreme Court before his punishment was carried out. The issue of the case was whether the death penalty should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. If it was considered cruel and unusual punishment, then it would also be in violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Felony Murder Rule

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chapter 7 explains that the Felony Murder Rule is any killing, whether intentional or not, occurring during the course of committing certain serious crimes, can result in life imprisonment or a death sentence. The problem with the law is the interpretation or over-enforcement. This rule states that rule of felony murder is a legal doctrine in most common law jurisdictions that broaden the crime of murder in two ways. When every an offender kills someone accidentally or without specific intent to kill the person it can become manslaughter and can be escalated to murder. Next, it can make any individual…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In accordance to the Penal Law, Murder in the first degree is defined “With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the death of such person… the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of committing / attempting to commit in furtherance of robbery [or other such felonies.]{§125.27(1)(a)(vii)}” This is also known as Felony Murder. Robbery is also defined as forcible stealing.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If it is alleged that a person knowingly or intentionally causes someone else’s death, he or she may be charged with murder in the state of Texas. Situations in which a person intends to cause serious bodily injury, or commits an act that is evidently gravely dangerous, then he or she may also be charged with murder. Additionally, people may also face murder charges under Texas state law if they are committing, or attempting to commit, a felony offense and, in the course of the act, another person is killed. This is also the case if someone is killed as a person is fleeing the commission, or attempted commission, of a…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Variation In Sentencing

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The “Seven deadly sins” law was passed and for the first time a first offense, a non-parolable sentence of at least ten years for kidnapping, armed robbery, rape, aggravated sodomy, aggravated sexual battery, and aggravated child molestation. Minimum sentence for first offense of murder is life, with no parole eligibility for 25 years. Second offense of any of the “seven deadly sins” gets life without possibility of parole. The monies received from the program is supposed to offset the cost of building more prisons to accommodate the longer sentencing (Timothy S Carr, 2008). One of the prison terms extended was armed robbery. In this paper I will address the charge of armed robbery and talk about some of the different sceneries surrounding the charge and the sentencing associated with it. One thing that will remain the same is, no matter how you change what happen, if you are charged with the crime and convicted, the minimum amount of time…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second Degree Robbery is a class C felony, it occurs when the perpetrator forcibly steals property with an accomplice present. It can also occur if the perpetrator causes injury to a person not involved in the crime and/or displays some kind of weapon. The First Degree Robbery is a class B felony, it occurs when he or another participant in the crime causes a serious injury to those not involved in the crime while carrying a deadly weapon. It can also occur if he uses a dangerous “instrument” to intimidate and/or displays some kind of weapon. These degrees are significant since they important factors that are considered in a trial. An armed robbery usually falls within the first degree felony, however it can change depending on the severity and if they are other participants. ("New York State Law." Article 160. Web. 12 Nov.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the felony-murder law is unconstitutional and Tisons cannot be executed because if they did not plan to or actually kill anyone, under the 8th Amendment, their punishment given is cruel and unusual. In Enmund v. Florida, Earl Enmund was given the death sentence for being an accessory to two murders. He later appealed and the Supreme Court ruled it was unlawful and his death sentence was vacated. The defendant’s punishment must be proportionate to the crimes they have committed and those not actually performing the murders should not be given the death sentence. We want consistency in the Supreme Court and giving the death penalty for Ricky and Raymond Tison should be uplifted because it would just not be a reasonable punishment. The 14th Amendment states, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. In the Enmund case, Earl Enmund was not given the death sentence because he did not commit any murder. It is only fair, under these circumstances, that the Tison brothers shouldn’t be given the death sentence either because they did not commit any murders. Our defendants were accessories to the murders, they aided and embedded their father and his friend, they were involved in armed robbery, kidnapping, and car theft but due to the fact that there is no evidence that the defendants intended to, attempted to, or in fact kill anyone, they do not deserve the death penalty under these conditions. We want to honor the 8th and 14th Amendment and keep uniformity in this country and that is why these two men should not receive the death sentence. There is no question these two brothers should be punished and that is why a life sentence without possibility of parole is a more…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics