Paradox in Romeo and Juliet

Black and white are opposite. It would be assumed that they would never be used together because the result would be rather grey. It would be assumed that this sort of comparison could never be beneficial. Although this is not the case in writing. For authors use paradoxes (such as black and white) to enforce themes. Shakespeare uses paradox to enforce themes, such as hate vs. love to exemplify the theme of the irrationality of ruthless hate, and youth vs. age enforcing impulsivity and open mindedness of the young and closed mindedness of the elder.
To begin love vs. hate is frequently used paradoxically, Juliet fell in love with the only son of her family’s great enemy, and many died due to their ruthless hate and disregard for reason or peace. Juliet was, at first, a very obedient child and agreed to marry Paris for her parent’s sake. When she met Romeo, all of this changed. Her love for Romeo is ironic, because out of all possible suitors, he is the only out of bounds. Juliet’s “only love sprung from [her] only hate” (61). Juliet, is torn between love and hate of Romeo in different situations. She is madly in love with him, but he’s a Montague that killed her cousin. Her confusion expresses the complex situation she is in. Erkskine believes that hate cannot coexist with love, and Romeo and Juliet’s death is inevitable, “The feud also, which was to defeat Romeo and Juliet with implacable hate, had been prepared for them before birth. Their destiny was one passion the obstacle to it was another.” Romeo and Juliet couldn’t love until they were parted by death. Every discord between the Montagues and Capulets pulls at the heartstrings of the audience who just wants Romeo and Juliet to be together. The fighting and hate between the two families causes the relationship to be less and less possible. When a Capulet is responsible for the death of a Montague or vice versa, the families hate each other more and more. When Romeo kills Tybalt, Juliet is very torn between