Preview

Liberal View of Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
748 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberal View of Human Nature
Assumptions about human nature in order to create social justice. According to Mill, social justice is “the idea that we can put in place a set of political institutions that will ensure the just distribution of benefits and costs throughout society.” In other words, social justice is in the hands of the government to create certain institutions that will greatly benefit everyone, and equally so. In order to do that, one must have an idea of the way human nature works so as to institute programs and such appropriately and properly.

While there are several different theories and thoughts on the way human nature simply is, and how that effects our equality amongst each other, the bulk of it falls into two main categories, that is, conservative and liberal.

Liberal Thought on Equality and Human Nature
Liberalism itself is a distinctive account of human nature.
The goal is to achieve justice in society.
Relevant differences amongst individuals in human nature that cause inequality: -guilt/innocence…what someone has or hasn’t done (something no bueno) -merit/desert…the good and bad in people, based on relevant capabilities or performance -need: some people have a naturally greater need for things than others
A principle of justice (relating to human nature): control condition- people held responsible for their voluntary choices, but not for their innate characteristics or factors beyond their control.
All persons are relatively equal. Hobbes: “For as to strength of the body, the weakest has strength enough to kill the strongest,” and in “the faculties of the mind” there exists “yet a greater equality amongst men.” -SO: equal in body and mind, and even more so in the latter.
-because of the equality of ability, we are also naturally hopeful of attaining our ends, and thus are naturally competitive. Hobbes then says that, “therefore, if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies.”

Locke:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi-286 Mod 3 Wa 1

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes lived during revolutionary times, beginning with the overthrow and demise of the English King, Charles 1, in 1641 (Newton, 2004). Hobbes writings of 1651 are documented with an influence from these events, while being credited with transition from medieval to modern thinking in Britain. Although Hobbes post-revolutionary treatise ultimately depended on accepting an absolute monarch, which contradicts present day philosophy, still, Hobbes is credited with the notion of a person's natural rights. Hobbes theory depicts the right of self-preservation, by stating a person may do whatever needs to be done to save their life and to procure the means to live (Newton, 2004). Hobbes' rather straightforward approach suggests that every man is an enemy of every man (Newton, 2004) and the worst that can happen to anyone is a violent death at the hands of others. Citing natural rights, Hobbes therefore indicates we have the right to prevent a violent death from taking place through self preservation, by taking action against those who may or may not harm us. Hobbes theory of mankind illustrates a violent, short, and solitary life, which arises perhaps his most powerful work. Hobbes identifies just how little humankind rarely uses good judgment. These ideals of natural rights, human judgment, and society set in motion a foundation, which would be expanded upon by…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, an Enlightenment philosopher, claimed that mankind is naturally evil and selfish and will cause conflicts “if any two men desire the same thing, which they nevertheless cannot both enjoy” or have differing opinions, in order to gain more power so that they can freely pursue their selfish desires, especially “during the time men live without a common power” and “in that condition which is called war, every man against every man,” and are therefore incapable of self-governing. Hobbes’ position on human nature is easily observable; intolerance and bigotry causes violence and general public…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes talks about his view of Human Nature in his book The Leviathan. His central belief was built around the idea that the nature of humanity leads people to seek power. He believed that humans naturally desired the power to live well, and that human beings will never be satisfied with the power they currently possess unless they acquire more power. Hobbes defined power as” the ability to…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s perspective is the opposite extreme of what John Locke stood for. He characterized the natural state of people as that of a state of, “war of every man against every man.” He also portrays all men as being equal, but equal in the sense that anyone can kill anyone else, and as a result of this, they live in constant fear and anxiety. He argues that man uses logic to deduce that the only reasonable way to protect one’s life is to gain enough power to control a state and to protect those who live under that particular state, gaining allies (which eliminates enemies in the process).…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To me, social and economic justice means fairness, where there is an equal opportunity provided for people without being deprive of their rights and privileges in the society.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LIBERALS – believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need.Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.…

    • 2923 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To begin with, that men are equal in both the faculties of body and mind is the first argument put forward by Hobbes, and from that equality follows an equality to acquire things. Thus, since men are equal, they tend to quarrel because they want the…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy which emphasizes on the rights of an individual, and usually the rights will assure by the government. Liberalism has turned up for around 300 years, and the complexity to explain and define liberalism is increasing as there are several forms, including classical liberalism, neo-liberalism, conservative liberalism, social liberalism, libertarianism and libertarian socialism (Mastin, 2008). Although anarchism, communism, democratic socialism, social democracy, communitarianism and liberal conservatism have the same objective with liberalism which support for democracy as well as basic equality and against authoritarianism, but it does not consider as liberalism (Haar, 2015).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being Liberal

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a nation with such polar political stances and opinions, I typically view myself as a liberal-leaning member of society. As a liberal, I value the rights of the individual, and the freedoms that we are born with. I take into consideration that opportunity and equality for all is an important idea that should be stressed in our society and should be carried out by our government. I also feel that it is the role of the government to eliminate social problems and protect the natural rights of each individual. I stand on the ground of eliminating the death penalty, enforcing pro-choice decisions, and accepting that Global Warming/ Climate Change is a direct result of poor human decisions and consumptions, along with many other liberal ideas.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hobbes’ continually points out, in a state of nature, fear is the most antagonizing force that a man produces to be used against others to perpetuate a state of constant war. It is this fear, along with the struggle for as much power as possible (which Hobbes establishes that it is men’s reasoning to do so) that creates the balance beam act which acts as the driving force for men to seek each other out and pursue peace. This pursuit for peace amongst themselves is not only instigated for the greater good of themselves, but also society as a whole, whereby in realizing the interconnectedness of their fellow peoples, men consent to the “social contract” that Hobbes’ presents.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Definition Essay

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a society, everyone should be equal regardless of their individual positions, achievements, race, or sex. Equality represents that each individual is free to develop their personal abilities, and make choices without limitations. Having equal rights, can dramatically increase success within the society.(IP) Understanding characteristic differences is more important than ever, as the United States becomes more diverse. Education, social, and gender equality, can all support a successfully stable society.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social factors that contribute to a diverse and equal society in which we live in…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Is Liberalism?

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the non-committal dictionary.com definition above suggests, the term “liberalism” is an elusive term to define. Whose faces are attached to the term? John F. Kennedy? Franklin D. Roosevelt? Barrack H. Obama? Does it evoke thoughts of the New Deal, Civil Rights, and Environmentalism? Or is it to be associated with James and John Stuart Mill, David Ricardo, Jeremy Bentham, and laissez-faire style economic policies? Without clarification, making reference to liberalism can be misleading. In this examination of the term, an attempt will be made at shedding some light on the origins of and the different meanings of the term liberalism.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays