Preview

King Charles I: The Last Absolute Monarch Of England

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
144 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Charles I: The Last Absolute Monarch Of England
In the end, the execution of Charles I had many consequences on England. It caused to the abolishment of the monarchy and the creation of the Commonwealth. It later led to the seizure of power of Olivier Cromwell, the abdication of his son and the restoration of the monarchy years later. However, even with the return of the monarchy, Charles I is considerate to be the last absolute monarch of England, as no king could reign without a parliament. This challenge of absolute monarchy not only had repercussions on England, but on all Western Europe and even on the colonies. The execution of Charles afraid many government throughout Europe, such has the French king. It spread the idea that king’s powers could be challenge almost in the entire world

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The end of the interregnum government heralded Charles II's return to the throne. The period known as the restoration can be argued to have been 'successful' for Charles. However, a successful reign can be distinguished in many ways. At the time one of the most important issues for Charles was trying to create a stable financial and stable settlement after the long period without a Monarch, and to an extent, 'success', can be defined to whether a stable settlement was established. Charles' triumphant, Anglican, State Church was arguably successful as it formed a stable religious settlement, yet on the other hand, it was not what Charles initially wanted. In this way it could be argued that 'success' can be measured to what extent Charles got what he wanted, and how much control he had over his Parliament. A successful reign can also be measured by assessing how well liked Charles was by his people at the time of financial difficulty following the grievances of the Civil War.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 1649, King Charles I was executed after being charged with high treason due to political and religious reasons, some of which contributed to his refusal in accepting the peace settlements given to him by Parliament. Charles’ refusal to compromise was supported by the division that had emerged within Parliament on how to fight the civil war between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The main factors of the failure to reach a settlement were religion, politics, Charles’ intransigence, the New Model Army and the emergence of radical ideas; all of which eventually concluded to Charles’ execution.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles the First became king in England, (also in Scotland) in 1625. He caused many problems with the Parliament because he believed in absolute monarchy. At one point Parliament limited Charles The First's power and he went along with a petition they had made but soon dismissed the Parliament.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born in 1500, Charles I of Spain is the successor to the Habsburg dynasty ruled Austria and large parts of Europe during the Reformation as Emperor Charles V. On the side of his father, Philip of Burgundy, Maximilian Habsburg Austria Mary of Burgundy and. On the side of his mother, Joana "The Mad" of Castile, Ferdinand and Isabella's, who unified the crown of Aragon Spain and Castile. This made Charles the heir of many lands, which he started at the age of sixteen successor. Growing up in Burgundy in France, his first language is French and he was steeped in the foreign policy of political Burgundy. Adrian of Utrecht, who a short time would become pope in 1522 before he died a year later, as a member of his court. Between 1516 and the death of his father, Emperor in 1519, Charles inherited procedure duchies Austria, Carinthia, Moravia, Tyrol, and Styria; Netherlands along with France-Comte from…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oliver Cromwell was a general for the Puritans during England's civil war. Cromwell captured Kin Charles for treason and had him executed. Cornwell now held power of England. He became a military dictator after ripping a constitution. Ireland then rebelled against him, so he sent an army to crush the rebels. 616,000 Irish died. After Cromwell's death the parliament appointed Charles II as ruler. Charles restored monarchy and brought back sports and theater.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Charles II, it would only make sense to get revenge on the organization that that removed his father from the throne, proceeded to execute him, and then essentially sent Charles II as far away from his birth right as possible. Charles II had a profound hatred of the New Model Army, and all he needed was a legitimate excuse to remove them. The biggest problem with having a full-time professional army is that they are always being paid even when not fighting. Charles II used the cost of the New Model to justify dissolving the army without making it appear to be him completing his personal vendetta. The New Model Army was surprisingly passive when they were disestablished in January 1661, though General Monck could keep his regiment leaving approximately 3,500 troops in Charles II’s control. On February 14, 1661, Monck marched his troops to Tower Hill, where they laid down their swords to represent the end of the New Model Army. They immediately retook their weapons in the name of King Charles II as a sign that they were now under the control of the king. Monck and his men were…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    parliament frq

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the execution of Charles I, Oliver Cromwell governed under a military dictatorship. He removed all Presbyterians from Parliament which created a Rump Parliament that voted to execute Charles and…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events and sentiments that ran through 17th century England were perhaps as paradoxical as Charles the 1st’s head being sewn back to his body after his execution. This era saw a polarization of thought, action and outcome in regards to several events, people and institutions. The height of this polarization existed between the monarchy and the parliament, as questions arose in regards to the extent of power the king could wield, and the extent of power Parliament was willing to allow the king to wield. The two ends of the power spectrum were absolute monarchy , which gave the king unlimited powers, or “royal prerogatives” according to the Stuarts due to their “divine right” to exercise it, and the other a constitutional monarchy , where…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Charles decided to rule for 11 years without calling parliament this created more tension, putting even more of the blame onto Charles. Without parliament Charles ran out of money so he started bending the rules, he charged ship money, to all countries. When Charles started breaking his own laws more people got annoyed and the tension rose again. An example is when he held trials for people he disliked without using a jury. Everyone thought a king should make the laws but once they are made should obey them. The archbishop of Canterbury started changing the churches to look more beautiful, this angered people because they thought he was gradually and secretly trying to make England catholic. Puritan leaders disliked Laud’s changes so Laud had their ears cut off, branded and then they were put in prison!…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did the Civil War Begin?

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On 22 August 1642, King Charles I raised his battle standard and declared a civil war against his enemies in Parliament.…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays