Preview

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1796 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
Antony’s Rhetorical Superiority Analysis Essay
In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of
…show more content…
The gift was a deep understanding of not just what to convey to an audience, but how to convey it: Ethos. From the very first sentence he spoke to the crowd, he had already received their rapt attention and their unconditional trust. He said, simply and honestly and without condescension, “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears…” (III.ii.74) In only seven-words, Antony’s genius for communication can be easily viewed. He began by placing himself and the crowd within three groups that they all belonged to, creating a sense of unity among the gathered Romans. In addition, Antony respectfully requests permission for those assembled to listen to what he had to say, making the crowd truly feel that Antony was a common Roman like them. However, Antony is able to maintain, through both how he identifies himself and the way he speaks, to command respect like a noble or emperor would. This balance that Antony strikes between modesty and arrogance allows him to speak with authority, and not appear to be giving orders even as he does so. A clear demonstration of that ability is when Antony tells the mob, “I come not, friends, to steal away your hearts; I am no orator, as Brutus is; but (as you know me all) a plain blunt man that love my friend…” (III.ii.218) Incredibly, Antony is able to mask his immense eloquence behind some of that very eloquence, casting himself and his tremendous words as the honest and simple words of a man whom loves his friend. Through this same passage, Antony distances himself from Brutus, whom he alleges as a practiced orator and politician trying to trick the people. The crowd, when then comparing Brutus to Antony, can connect to and hence trust the word of Antony far more, allowing him to widen the range of things he could say. Employing all of these tactics and many more, Mark Antony confirms how

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    devices in order to persuade Brutus, a senator and friend of Caesar, that Caesar is…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony not only played with the emotions of his audience like they were children’s toys, but he did so in an ingenious way which helped to keep the conspirators from suspecting him in doing something to go against them. He made the people of Rome sort…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Caesars funeral two of his best men gave speeches, Antony and Brutus, they both used ethos, pathos and logos in different ways to win over the crowd. Brutus was in the senate so he was supposed to give great speeches with structure. Antony was a general so he was not as good at giving speeches but was good at pumping up his solders before battle. Which he used to his advantage when speaking to the mourning crowd.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulation, in essence, is a timeless recurring theme not only in literature, but in our everyday life. William Shakespeare’s drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is saturated with rhetorical strategies. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony use their words throughout different parts of the play to sway other people’s opinions. Cassius’s persuasion is so powerful it leads to the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus is left with the repercussions of the assassination and has to speak to the Romans. Brutus and Antony go back-to-back speaking to the Romans using rhetorical strategies to explain their diverse views on the event. These three characters’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos was so compelling it persuaded the other people’s views, caused Caesar’s death,…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. I felt that Antony’s diction was very formal in his speech; unlike Brutus the crowd does not respond in his speech. Antony uses advance word choice, which makes him look more intelligent to the not so intelligent clump of Romans. An excellent example of his formal diction would be, “ So let it be with Caesar. The Noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious: if it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answer’d it” (Shakespeare, lines 79-82) the words such as…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, a play set in Ancient Rome, the characters Calphurnia and Decius are in opposition. Calphurnia hopes to prompt her husband,Caesar, to stay at home instead of going to the Senate because she fears that Caesar's life is in jeopardy. Decius, in this case Calpurnia’s adversary, wants to persuade Caesar that he should in fact go to the Senate where his doomed fate awaits him. Shakespeare uses many rhetorical devices in Calpurnia's conversation and Decius’ conversation with Caesar, each attempting to convince Caesar to take their side.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Use of Rhetoric

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," William Shakespeare shows the power of rhetoric. Rhetoric is the ability to speak or write effectively. Shakespeare shows this power through Antony, Julius Caesar's best friend. Antony shows this at Caesar's funeral, at which Brutus, one of the conspirators who killed Caesar, allowed him to speak to the public under the condition that he not speak badly of the conspirators. Antony was a powerful speaker and was deeply gifted in the art of rhetoric. He was able to turn the public against the conspirators without breaking his promise to Brutus. Antony did this by using the techniques of ethos, pathos, and logos.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays