Preview

Faragher V. City Of Boca Raton Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Faragher V. City Of Boca Raton Case Study
Facts: Between 1985 and 1990 Beth Ann Faragher worked part time and during the summers as an ocean lifeguard for the Marine Safety Section of the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Boca Raton, Florida. During this time, Faragher's immediate supervisors were Bill Terry, David Silverman, and Robert Gordan. Two years after resigning as a lifeguard in 1990, Beth Ann Faragher brought an action against the City of Boca Raton, Terry and Silverman alleging the supervisors had created a sexually hostile atmosphere by touching, remarking, and commenting. Faragher asserted that this conduct constituted discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In 1986 the City adopted a sexual harassment policy, however the policy did not reach the Marine Safety Section where Faragher worked. Faragher did not make any formal complaints against …show more content…
In trial the District Court found that the supervisors' behavior was discriminatory harassment sufficiently serious to alter the conditions of her employment and constitute an abusive working environment. The Court further held the City liable because the city failed to properly disseminate the sexual harassment policy to all employees and properly enforce this policy. Also, the supervisors represented the City and city management failed to provide any reviews over this section but allowed the supervisors "unchecked authority". The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, finding that the supervisors were harassing Beth Ann outside the scope of their employment, that they were not aided in their actions by the agency relationship, and that the City had no constructive knowledge of the harassment by virtue of its pervasiveness or her immediate supervisor's actual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th, 2016, because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez, whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico, and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match. Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Martinez-Maldonado were indicted for the trips payment. The charges were violation of the federal bribery statute, conspiracy, and the Travel Act. These charges tied Mr. Martinez-Maldonado’s support of legislation beneficial…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Citation to the case is 203 F.3d 135. The Key facts of the case are Danuta Ryduchowski worked for Port Authority as an engineer from 1988 to 1995. In September of 1995 Ms. Ryduchowski was fired from her job. On November 14th 1996 Ms. Ryduchowski filed a claim that Port Authority discriminated against her on the basis of her gender and national origin she claimed that, while working at the Port Authority, she was subjected to insults, jokes, and harassment related to her gender and national origin. She asserted that as a result of this discrimination, Port Authority failed to promote. They also did not pay her equally as they would a male colleague. Ms. Ryduchowskis was at time of hire the only female engineer on the staff. She had a good…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LOZMAN v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA was a case brought upon the Supreme Court questioning what kind of floating structures fall under maritime jurisdiction. The Supreme Court’s ruling in this case was decided after an immense struggle of questions pertaining to an array of issues. These issues, among others, include the definition of the word “vessel” and the necessities needed for a watercraft to be practically capable of maritime transportation.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether helping customers to fill out government forms is an act of engaging in unauthorized practice of law for paralegals?…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Wittenburg v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. (AEFA), Bonnie Wittenburg was an employee for AEFA in their Minneapolis office. The plaintiff was hired by the company in November of 1998 at the age of forty-six to serve as an Equity Research Analyst in AEFA's Equity Investment Department. During a reduction in force by the defendant in 2003, the plaintiff was terminated. In January of 2004, the plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received her Notice of Right to Sue on January 30, 2004. The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender. AEFA moved for a summary judgment.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her charge with EEOC she claimed "I have been discriminated against because of my sex, female and retaliated against for complaining of discrimination in violation of Title VII section 704(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended." (EEOC)…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal issue in the case of Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involved acts of ill will, which could have been avoided. While employed as a detention officer at the Dona Ana County Detention Center, Joseph Herrera was accused of unsuitable sexual behavior with female prison inmates and of exchanging favors for sex acts. One of the reasons that the Mesilla Valley Hospital (MVH) had hired Herrera is because of the favorable recommendations that were given by Frank Steel and Al Mochen who were in supervisory roles. Steel had investigated the charges that were brought up against Herrera and advised him that he would be reprimanded. He advised Herrera that his performance had been “questionable” and “suspect” and advised Herrera that he would intend to seek disciplinary action. Herrera resigned rather than proceed with the scheduled hearing. Six days after recommending disciplinary action, Steel wrote a letter on Herrera’s behalf stating that he was an “….excellent employee and supervisor. I am confident that you would find Herrera to be an excellent employee” (Walsh, 2010, p. 149). Early December 1994, Herrera applied for employment with MVH and they contacted the Detention Center where Herrera worked for a reference. Mochen told MVH that,” Herrera was a good person and a hard worker whom he would definitely rehire” (Walsh, 2010, p. 149). The Plaintiff in this case sued the County stating that if the misinformation had not been given regarding Herrera’s character and work ethic that he would not have been hired and Plaintiff would not have been…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did the Title VII section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (updated in 1991) go far enough and provide adequate protection for the U.S. workforce? For the vast majority of states, the answer is a resounding yes; most states defer to the federal legislation for employment-related discrimination laws. There are, however, a handful of states that have enacted their own versions of Title VII; in doing so, they are effectively saying that no, Title VII does not meet the needs of our state. One state that has enacted its own form of employment discrimination laws is Florida; in 1992, the Florida Legislature passed the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. Section 760.10 specifically addresses many of the same issues covered by Title VII protections. What is the same, and what is different, between the two Acts? This paper will summarize the two sets of laws, describe the similarities, and detail the distinct differences between Title VI, the federal law, and Section 760.10 of the Florida law.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manner Case Summary

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plaintiff is an African-American woman who is employed by the state as a correctional officer. The Plaintiff’s supervisor (who is a female) made negative comments about the African-American workers on her staff and the Plaintiff complained. The supervisor called the Plaintiff at home and made comments about how the Plaintiff should focus on her family, and asked whether her husband had ever hit her. There were also incidents of insensitive racial comments. The Plaintiff filed a claim alleging a hostile workplace under both race and…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The U.S. District Court held that although evidence was sufficient to conclude that Suder’s supervisors engaged in sexual harassment, PSP was not vicariously liable for the supervisors’ conduct.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court made a judgment that affected the California users of medical marijuana. Under a law the federal Controlled Substance Act, marijuana is a schedule one controlled substance, however under a 1996 state California law, marijuana is legalized for usage for people who have a prescription from a doctor for medical usage. When the federal Drug Enforcement Administration enforced the CSA by destroying one of the defendant's marijuana plants, the defendants claimed that their constitutional rights were infringed upon.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Muller Vs Harris

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Forklift Systems Inc. (1993) this was a case that made helped define a hostile and abusive work environment. Teresa Harris was a manager at Forklift Systems Inc.; she alleged that within a period of 2 years the president of the company was subject to gender discrimination. She claimed that he used sexual remarks when talking to her and even offered sexual advance offers; he did this even in the presence of fellow employees. She confronted him about his actions and his response was that he was fooling around and he also apologized to her promising to seize that kind of behavior. However, after a few months his boss began to harass her again. She later on quit her job claiming it was an unsafe environment for her to work. Harris filed a suit in State District court but the court ruled that Harris’s employer did not make a cruel environment for her. They stated it would not affect someone’s psychological being and performance at work. The Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia expressed that frustration inherent in attempts to succinctly define sexual harassment. The decision was criticized for its vagueness (49). The suit was late settled outside the courts. The terms for settlement were not released to the…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The category I chose to explore was gender, gender can be a broad term that can include a person’s sex (male, female, or chose not to answer). This category extends to difference in treatment in the workplace according to gender, such as compensation, the hiring/firing/training/benefits process. In the case of Anderson v. City & County of San Francisco, Speckman (2014), indicated that 35 male and female deputies from San Francisco Sheriff’s Department filed a consolidated claim against both the city and county claiming discrimination against male deputies in violation of Title VII and California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Speckman, 2014). In October 2006 the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department implemented a new policy to prohibit male deputies from holding supervisory…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sexually Harrassment

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the first article the EEOC filed a complaint in a Federal district court Taronica White v. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Department of Justice on February 6, 2011. Taronica and a group of women went to their local EEOC to seek help due to the terrifying sexual harassment they faced on a daily from inmates and the male management officer. Federal Correctional Complex Colman (FCC Coleman) was charged with failing to protect female workers from the inmates. The women alleged the environment was filled with sexual abuse and assault, more than 60 women provided affidavits complaining about the public masturbation, vulgar language, rape threats, and groping by inmates. The women stated when the issues was brought to management attention they were told “stop complaining so much, this is a prison what you expect, one woman…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays