Preview

Evaluate The Claim That Conscience Is T

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
835 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluate The Claim That Conscience Is T
Evaluate the claim that conscience is the voice of god
Conscience can be divided into three theories, one being ‘an awareness of what is good and bad ‘believed by St. Paul, secondly the conscience is the power to distinguish good from evil believed by St. Jerome and thirdly, the conscience is the voice of God, believed by St. Augustine. Thomas Aquinas thought that the conscience is a device for distinguishing our right actions from our wrong ones, he believed that we all obey the synderesis rule which means that we all have a innate awareness of good and bad that cannot be mistaken, this is why he reckoned that people do generally tend towards the good and away from evil. However Aristotle had not realized that mistakes can be made when working out what is good and what is evil, as it would be unlikely for every single human being to agree on what is right and wrong. Our conscience does not command our action of choosing right or wrong, but is ‘reason making the right decision’. In relation to the moral Argument, Immanuel Kant said that we all have a sense of moral law. If we feel we ought to do something, this can prove that we have free will, which allows us and our conscience to make the correct decisions when deciding upon the rightness or wrongness of a situation/outcome. But to be free allows for some mistakes, Aquinas agrees that the conscience is infallible, that it is not the voice of god, but it is part of our God given make up.
Joseph Butler agreed with Aquinas about our conscience being innate, and that God gave it to us, but his views are more intuitive than Aquinas’s. Joseph Butler thought that our conscience helps us focus on others rather than ourselves, it has the ultimate authority in ethical judgments and situations. Butler believed our conscience is our own personal guide to our moral behavior, which stems back to Kants Moral argument that it is our duty to follow it. The conscience for Butler was at the top of our human hierarchy of needs,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whistleblowers: A whistleblower is a person within a company who speaks out about any organizational deviance that is occurring. There are three main types of whistle blowers, which are, unbending resisters, implicated protesters, and reluctant collaborators. Implicated Protesters speak out within organization than comply with the deviance. They choose to go along with their superiors, because they may have believed that resisting would be worse for them than complying.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    One of the key features of Butler’s story is to highlight the broad characteristics that constitute the idea of human-ness, and to question whether our understanding of what it is to be human will change, or whether it can…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet they are unable to utilize it properly, and because of this they are still considered the lower animal. This trait is a human 's ability to perceive morality. There are a couple of instances where he speaks about the moral sense. First, he compares a human and a cat. He says, "cats are loose in their morals, but not consciously so. Man in his descent from the cat, has brought the cat 's looseness with him but has left the unconsciousness ' behind-the saving grace which excuses the cat." (1249). He distinguishes that a Human has the ability to choose, but a cat does not. The other instance takes up a good portion of the essay. He expresses about the moral sense: "the ability to distinguish good from evil; and with necessarily, the ability to do evil; for there can be no evil act without the presence of consciousness of it in the doer of it." (1252). He once again explains that humans have a choice while the higher animals do not. Therefore, humans are still the lower animal because of the choice to do…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality is the human attempt to define what is right and wrong pertaining to our actions and thoughts. Conferring to C.S. Lewis, he describes the behavior on three levels: First is to certify fair play and agreement between persons; second is to help make us better people in order to have a decent civilization; and the third is to keep us in a good connection with the control that created us. We can become moral by ourselves by expanding those things that can help us pursue our dreams and by believing in ourselves which give us a motivation. What motivates our life is the mind behind the physical things. What motivates the mind is the being that permeates everything.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is a uniquely human characteristic. As it is something we have created but cannot touch. We can assume it is housed in the inner workings of our mind. Morality moves us to action, but we must first determine its origin. The mind has the…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The attempt to assert that there are natural facts, the concept that is termed naturalism, is a form of moral realism. Naturalism is empiricist in inspiration. It essentially regards ethical concepts as derived from experience and not given to use by reason a priori. So the naturalist looks to the world in search of moral facts and values, hoping to show that moral judgements are really judgements about natural facts that we can discover. In terms of cognitivism, this also means that our moral judgements express certain beliefs about the world, because they refer to some sort of fact, and hence they are capable of being true or false. For some critics of naturalism, most notably G.E Moore, what the naturalist is trying to do is to convert all our talk of morals into talk about something we can understand better, namely natural facts about the world and human beings. In this sense naturalism is a reductive doctrine. It says that moral values can be reduced to, or explained in terms of something else. Naturalistic theories all agree that we can analyse moral terms such as "good" and explain them in other terms - but they disagree on the precise explanation of these terms, in other words there is no consensus as to what the natural properties are that moral terms refer to.…

    • 2399 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Conscience

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "never do anything to against the conscience, even if the state demands it." This quote is from Albert Einstein. In this quote, Albert Einstein tells us what a normal person should do when faced with a moral dilemma. What people do is often the opposite of what their conscience tells them to do. " The Sniper" by O' Flaherty and "War" by Timothy Findley are both good examples of this. The two stories both show that war brings people pain because it forces them to contradict their consciences and feelings.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biblical Worldview

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is right or wrong and where do we get our moral filter to distinguish the two? The Apostle Paul tells us that our conscience is our moral compass that has been written in our hearts by God. (Romans 2:15) Many people are…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many may think that people are born with morals, but in reality it is said that morals are taught. People can say that morals are universal. They are taught what is right from wrong. People might disagree with others, but to each his own. In The New York Times article “The Moral Instinct” , author Steven Pinker expresses his view on morals and argues that the study of the moral sense can help people become “better” .…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant was a deontologist who believed that knowledge was created by the mind, not external factors; because of this he wanted to unite reason and experience. Humanity’s frail nature was the human condition according to Kant, their struggle to make moral decisions and do the right thing can only be solved by employing reason and his three maxims when decision making.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conscience vs. Society

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conscience and society are often in conflict with one another. Your culture and the people around you may be telling you to do one thing, while in your heart; you feel that a different way is the way to go. This is exactly what happens in Sophocles’ play Antigone. Ismene, Haimon, and Creon all have a difficult time choosing between following what their conscience is saying and what society thinks, which leads to conflict between the characters.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Moral Instinct

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A journalist of The New York Times Magazine by the name of Steven Pinker published an article titled, “The Moral Instinct.” The purpose of the article was to discuss morality and the questions and speculations around it. In the article, Pinker suggests that our moral goodness is just in our minds and is there to help us decide between what is right and wrong. He says that our moral goodness isn’t just an opinion-based conclusion, whether we favor or disfavor something. To Pinker, morality makes us feel like we have a purpose to live, and that that purpose solely comes from our loved ones. Pinker goes on to talk more about morality and poses many claims; claims that I have found very interesting. In further study of this article, particularly the claims Pinker brought up, I found some interesting texts that extend and complicate Pinker’s arguments as well as stimulate my thoughts about morality.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Importance of Ethics

    • 3331 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Aristotle was one of the first and perhaps most influential of all people to shape the ethics of Western civilization from a secular orientation. He believed that every type of animal has a common essence or nature, and that human beings are essentially, or by nature, rational. He viewed rationality as the central and most significant trait distinguishing humankind from other creatures. Further, Aristotle taught that the good person is the one who lives most rationally and whose moral judgments and social conduct are born of contemplation and reason, in contrast to spontaneity and emotionality. Today, when we address a moral dilemma by saying, "Let us use reason; let us use logic; let us think rationally about this," we are being ethical in the Aristotelian, secular tradition.[i]…

    • 3331 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays