Preview

Ethical Egoism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
513 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Egoism
There are a few reasons as to why I do not think an ethical egoist would agree with Socrates decision to stay and be executed. For example, egoists don’t care about the good cause, Gods cause, the cause of mankind, the cause of truth, of freedom, of humanity, and of justice, which will all Socrates does care about. Egoist believes that the only concern is themselves and that there is no meaning to good or bad.
Socrates viewpoint about remaining in jail and being executed is all based on the idea that if he breaks out of jail he would be unjust, and just in general goes against his beliefs. “ Socrates wants to abide by the law because he respected the city as well as the laws that governed Athens. Living by such laws allowed Socrates to lead what he perceived to be the just life, therefore the good life. For Socrates “it is never right to commit injustice or return injustice to defend one self against injury by retaliation. “ “ Then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him.” If Socrates would to escape, then it would be breaking the law. Even if he felt that the jury was wrong for convicting him, his intention is not to return a wrong for another wrong. Socrates can’t escape if he thinks that doing that action is unjust, he has personal principles which is that just action is the right action and going against that principle would be unjust. To do an unjust action ruins one soul and life isn’t worth living with a ruined soul. Socrates believed that there was no point in living, if his life was not moral and just. To him quality of his life is more important than the quantity of it. In addition, Athens protects him with right and laws and he feels that in return he has to obey them by being just.
In my opinion, Socrates philosophy is completely right. A person was born into a country with laws and therefore agrees to it as a citizen. Athens reasoning to the execution is questioning to many

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I believe that Socrates has made the absolute most just decision with everything he could have done. It still remains remarkable to me that he had turned down such an easy and pleasant life of exile to take on his execution that he is innocent for. Although it seems like such a hard thing to pass on, I know I would have done the exact same thing after some deep thought about how it would impact myself along with the rest of the community. I fully stand behind Socrates’ decision by staying in prison and taking on his…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that these laws has given him birth, have educated him, raised him and have shared the wealth of Athens with him. Socrates thinks that the people of Athens are free to leave if they find the laws unjust, but if they want to stay then they must abide by the laws of Athens. The only thing that he points out are the people in power. He thinks that the people who are in power have changed the original laws for their own benefit. “been wronged, not by the Laws, but by men” (p 54). Socrates accepts death penalty because he wants the laws should be remain in place. Given opportunities such as exile or apology, he argues that if he escape from the prison, it will destroy the laws of the city and, eventually, the city because according to Socrates no city can survive without its laws being enforced. Therefore, Socrates steadfast by his believes of not violating any…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason Socrates believed that his death would be more harmful on the Athenian people because the children would lose their teacher. The children looked up to Socrates as their role model, they enjoyed watching him examine people and proving them unwise when they think that they are wise. They learnt from his philosophizing. Socrates predicted that his execution would make the children of Athens rebel. During the trial, he used the analogy of horses and horse trainers in comparison to teaching the children. He stated that not just anyone can train a horse; only an expert could do so. Most people would have a negative effect on the horses if they tried to train them. Therefore, saying that the same goes for children, it would take someone with expertise to better the children’s minds. Without an appropriate mentor the children would never learn as they age into adulthood which would affect Athens for years to come.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates believed that his purpose, as a moral individual, was to achieve true wisdom of virtue and justice. With this considered, one may ask, "Then why did he accept punishment for crimes he didn't commit?" Socrates didn't care for fate, because he was only concerned for whether or not he and others were doing the right thing. This belief is shown to be evident when Socrates says, "You are sadly mistaken, fellow, if you suppose that a man with even a grain of self-respect should reckon up the risks of living or dying, rather than simply consider, whenever he does something, whether his actions are just or unjust, the deeds of a good man or a bad one." (Defence of Socrates, 28a).…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Frankena (1973) Socrates argued that there were three typical patterns of reasoning in moral matters. The first belief was that no one should harm to another person. The principle was if an action was to the detriment of another human then it went counter to moral reasoning. If a person killed another person for whatever cause then it cannot be justified using moral reasoning. This belief has been used by those who oppose fighting a war, condemning a person to death for a crime, or by those choosing to object to abortions. Frankena (1973) uses Socrates example about escaping from jail to validate the point that the action would do harm to the state. Thus, it would hurt people.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates in essence, believes in god and is too wise for his own good. Throughout whole trial he spoke nothing but the truth however, because of the greed and jealousy of men they convicted him other wise simply because of their own intentions. Furthermore, searching for the truth couldn't be possible because of the reality of the situation: Socrates was considered the wisest man, people in an act of evil wanted to confront and destroy him and in essence, this couldn't be possible because in fact Socrates was the wisest man and was unknowing of it. This in reality represents the irony in the situation because Socrates doesn't consider himself to be the wisest man in Greece, but he is. In reality Socrates only escape from death was to lie and he didn't feel obliged to do so. In fact the truth was there the whole time and it was up to the people to pry through the illusion of this situation and understand what Socrates was saying. This represents the high cost of searching out the truth in this case, which was the causing of Socrates'…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Athenians were so close minded, they out casted anyone that didn't conform to their traditions. They should have been open to anything and not simply dislike a person or a situation because it didn’t follow their ideals. Socrates’ trial eventually led to his death and this illustrates that everyone has limitations. We can’t reject what we were taught or certain laws in society just because we don’t agree. Society functions because we work together and change together not because we do what we want. Furthermore, when Socrates was on trial he made a point to say that the democracy was poison to the people. Yet when his friend Crito offers him an escape from his death he denies the offer because he believes it is unjust to not face his execution. There are many theories behind why Socrates said no since he didn’t support the democracy; I believe it is because he had an open mind. (Crito,76-77). Yes, him being open-minded lead to his death; however, it indicates that he understood limitations of the law and respected societies perspectives.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrate's Conviction

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why, in a society relishing freedom and democracy, would a seventy-year-old philosopher be executed for what he was teaching? What could Socrates have done to prompt a jury of 500 Athenians send him to his death just a few years before he would have died naturally? He was charged with not believing in the gods worshipped by the city, introducing new divinities and for corrupting the youth. Socrates was a freethinker who went around Athens probing his fellow Athenians with questions and dialectal interrogations about religion and politics. He held contemporary views, that when he expressed them, provoked his listeners to anger. In 423 B.C., Socrates produced a play called Clouds, which at the time proved to be no threat to Athenian values and democracy. Characters in the play were taught how strengthen weak arguments by learning rhetorical skills and trickery and innovative divinities were introduced. However in 399 B.C., Socrates was charged with impiety. This was not the only charge brought against this philosopher; he was also accused for corrupting adolescences, Alcibiades and Critias. Should he have been condemned to death over such charges? Although religion and the state were central to ancient Athenian law, Socrates was executed unjustly.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society we are told that if we are put on trial we are judged by a jury of our own peers, a right an attorney, and that we are innocent until proven guilty. When Socrates was put on trial he was given none of these, to be fair he decided not to have a lawyer. Socrates was charged for not believing in the gods that the state believed in and corrupting the youth, brought to the court by Meletus and others.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though Socrates is proven guilty he has no regrets. He believes he did nothing wrong and is happy to share his knowledge with people. Socrates says, “is not to avoid death but to avoid unrighteousness.”(168-169) In this he is saying he is not upset about dying and he did the right in life. Again he shows this is true when he says, “I would rather die having spoken after my manner, than speak in your manner of life.”(163) He’s saying again he did the right thing and rather die than not have shared his knowledge and be a wise man. Socrates makes it clear he did the right thing in life, at least what he thinks the right thing is. He wants to help people in his life and succeeded in doing so, so he is not afraid of death. He is smart and wise and wants to keep teaching his knowledge. He states this when he says “ You will not easily find another like me, and therefore I advise you to spare me.”(110-111) Socrates makes it clear teaching his believes was obviously not a crime and has no regrets of doing so.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that he does not deserve punishment is the most compelling case that I found. The argument Socrates uses has been proven to be not only valid, but also sound which makes it a very compelling case for Socrates not to be punished. The jury however does not appeal to his sense of defending himself and sentences him to death. Socrates was wrongly sentenced to death because the punishment that should have been issued would be counseling. The main question is still raised from Socrates argument that if no one intentionally does harm which would lead to no punishment being issued, then why is there a court system for people to be tried. This would suggest that either Socrates argument is flawed that people do intentionally cause harm to others, (which is shown to not be true) or the second option the people of Athens are flawed in the way they persecute their own people in a system that is…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Argument

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this paper I will explain Socrates’ agreement at 50 a-b of the Crito, and explain my reason why would not cause his fellow citizens harm by breaking the law. Specially I will show that people can actually create a positive. I will explain that Socrates argument and show how depends on how what the unjust causes. Then I will argue that this assumption is to be questioned under the fact that citizens are not necessarily affected by the law breakers, and that by doing something unjust can be moral.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Apology

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Continuing on, Socrates states, “what’s best and easiest isn’t to put down other people, but to prepare oneself to be the best on can” (39 d). He says this in a last attempt to teach the people in the courtroom. He knows that younger people will step up in his place and continue questioning the higher authorities of Athens just as he did. He knows that the Athenians will never be free of Socrates just because he has been condemned to death. Socrates has taught many people and has many followers that will continue his work. He says the best and easiest thing to do isn’t to put down other people because more people will just step up after they put down the first. Putting people down for what they believe will not free the Athenians from questioning and they teachings of Socrates. It might even fuel Socrates followers’ cause. Socrates warns the jury that it would be easier if they did not worry about Socrates and his followers and to let them be and instead focus on themselves. If they bettered themselves and were able to answer Socrates questions, then they would truly be free.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nevertheless, this does not necessarily mean that they must blindly subject to the laws. Much like Socrates’ view, I reckon, as citizens, we should also have the right to challenge the laws, to persuade it, if we see something reprehensible, rather than mindlessly subjecting to the principle. For instance, it is common for individuals of today, and throughout the course of history, to express their discontent with the law. For this reason, they may choose to express their disapproval by challenging the law through modes of demonstrations and protests. Likewise, as the voice of the law had pointed out, Socrates had his chance to challenge the law, during his trial. However, just as protesters may encounter obstacles along the way, such as threats of charges and arrest due to their inability to convince the mass of their view, Socrates must face the verdict if he fails to convince the jury otherwise. In other words, as stated by the law, in agreeance with the rule, we have the ability to “persuade it as to the nature of justice” (50b), but if we are unable to achieve such action, we are to obey the law. Furthermore, citizens also have the right to move about freely, without restraints from the government. For example, if we are in disagreeing with the law, we have the freedom to relocate to an area that better satisfies our personal principles and ideologies. We have witnessed this phenomenon numerously throughout history. As learned from history, there have been countless amounts of immigrants and refugees who leave their countries due to the discontent of the nation’s laws, conditions, or treatments towards individuals. Similarly, the Athenian law made note that Socrates had the ability to leave Athens if he claims that he was unhappy with the government system. However, as mentioned previously, he had an implied agreement with the city by remaining in Athens for 70 years, and…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peloponnesian War Analysis

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Precisely at that moment, Socrates was the only one who knew that what he wished for would invariably displease the members of the jury and make them vote for his capital punishment. Moreover, he was only one who knew that he would not flee from the Athens. In other words, he was advisedly setting into motion a chain of events that would result in his imminent execution. In his Apology Socrates says: “I’ll even die not giving in.” (Plato, p. 95). Hence, could Socrates consciously sacrifice himself to the Gods for sings of those who he failed to educate? It is possible that in his opinion to be convicted and continue live bearing such reputation was to give in and betray everything that he believed in, because for Socrates his whole life was devoted to improving his “fellow man by making them to recognize their own ignorance” (Plato, p. 81). Therefore, I do not think that Socrates was a problem for Athenian society at all, so if I was on the jury I would have voted: “innocent” at both stages: verdict and…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays