"One will recall that there are two necklaces in the story. The first one is the more expensive one. It represents the true upper class of society, those that can truly afford to possess such an object. Madame Forestier feels comfortable allowing Madame Loisel to borrow the necklace. She is not afraid to let go of it. This suggests that her life savings are not tied up in it. She does not guard it so carefully that she is unwilling to let it out of her sight. She is comfortable taking a small risk with it.
"However, Madame Forestier is less than amicable when the necklace is returned a week late. This indicates that although, she was not devastated by the loss of the necklace, it still held a considerable value to her. Her reactions indicate that it was still an uncomfortable loss and held some value in her life. To the wealthy, class of Victorian France, their finery was s symbol of not only their wealth, but their power in society as well. This necklace was important to Madame Forestier as a symbol of her station in French society. We do not know how many pieces such as this that she owned, but this may have been an important piece to her."
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In “The Necklace,” a female character, Mathilde, is living in Paris during the 19th century. She is poor, yet undyingly wishes she was wealthy. One day the woman is invited to a prestigious ball within her city. She immediately she contacts a rich friend and borrows a fabulous necklace. Once the night is all said and done and she returns from the ball, she realizes that the borrowed necklace is lost. She reacts by lying about the necklace and buying her friend a new one. With her financial situation the way it is she goes spiraling into debt and never recovers. Later, once Mathilde admits to her friend that she lost and replaced the necklace, it is revealed that the borrowed necklace was a fake worth very little.…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the beginning of “The Necklace”, Mathilde is not satisfied with her life, for she is stuck in a middle-class lifestyle when she desperately feels that she is “born for every delicacy and luxury.” (de Maupassant) In the nineteenth century, the wealthiest people commonly threw elegant balls, and invited many of their friends. If de Maupassant decided to have this…
- 179 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In “The Necklace,” GUY DE MAUPASSANT character loisel Mathilde who is a very greedy and selfish woman, believes that she was born for every delicacy and luxury there is and feels that she was made for all beautiful jewels and clothes, which cause her emotional…
- 1277 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
You can read “The Necklace” as a story about greed, but this is also about pride. Mathilde Loisel is a very proud woman. She feels far above the humble circumstances and she is forced to live with her husband by her common birth. Her current situation disgusts her. She is also vain too, completely caught up in her own beauty. It is pride that prevents Mathilde from admitting they've lost an expensive necklace. After the loss of the necklace makes Mathilde poor, and her beauty fades, she may learn a pride of a different sort: pride in her own work and…
- 676 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The moment when Mme. Loisel and M. Loisel “took the case to the jeweler whose name they found inside. He consulted his records.’I didn’t sell the necklace, madame,’ he said. ‘I only supplied the case.’”(32). Mme. Loisel and her husband are both convinced the necklace is real due to the looks of the costume jewel and the case. We, after all know the necklace does not belong to the case which implies the necklace is not that expensive. The most distinct foreshadowing the necklace is inexpensive is Mme. Forestier’s reaction. As Mme. Loisel lost Mme. Forestier’s necklace, her husband tells “her you have broken the catch and are having it repaired. That will give us a little time to turn around’”(32). Just as, Mme. Loisel returned the decoy necklace to Mme. Forestier, her reaction is, “‘You should have brought it back sooner; I might have needed it.’”(33). Mme. Forestier reaction to it all, foreshadows that if the necklace was valuable, she would have been more worried and paranoid. Regardless of their mistake, they were hinted multiple times, yet they failed to think it is not real because they were outplayed by the…
- 358 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I agree that the writer’s goal was accomplish because through symbolism of a necklace, Maupassant was able to reveal the moral of the story. We see in the story that the main character who was obsessed with her look wasn’t satisfied with her life. She had a good husband who cared for her and did everything to make her happy. She did not see that. This can be applied to reality in the sense that we get caught up with what we look like or what we are wearing, that we go to lengths to make it happen. Through the symbol of a necklace, the author was able to convey to the readers the theme that vanity is worthless and there’s a price to pay for vanity and that we should be grateful for what we have.…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
After the party, Madame Loisel loses the necklace, resulting in tireless work, loans, and night jobs for her and her husband in order to pay back the equivalent of the price. The couple finally succeeds when all the money is paid ten years later, only for Mathilde to discover that the necklace was ironically a fake, and worth a very small percentage of what the couple paid. The theme of this story is that an overemphasis on material wealth can shrink the spirit and leave one open to the changeability of fortune. The situational irony highlights this moral because the Loisels would never have had to exhaust themselves if Madame Loisel wasn’t so obsessed with riches and wealth. From the very beginning of the story, she wastes her time dreaming of luxuries such as fine silks, beautiful furniture, and gourmet feasts. Even when she is at Madam Forestier’s house to try on necklaces to borrow, she is never satisfied until she has seen the very best. Madame Loisel’s preoccupation with appearance clouds her judgment as well. As soon as she realizes that she has lost the necklace, she should simply come clean to Madam Forestier. Instead, she is too concerned with how her reputation will be affected, so she keeps quiet. She later pays the price for this when she discovers that the necklace is “false [and]…worth five hundred francs at most.” The life that she gets instead as punishment during the ten years in debt is even more difficult and meager than her life to begin with, which stresses how fame and fortune is so fleeting and unimportant in the scheme of…
- 1345 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
“The Necklace” Maupassant focuses on femininity. He develops a character as a woman who possesses all the attributes needed to be desirable by other men. “She had no dresses, no jewelry, nothing. And she loved nothing else; she felt herself made for that only. She would so much have liked to please, to be envied, to be seductive and sought after (as cited in Clugston, 2011, para.6).” She’s in a marriage where she does not care for her husband and hates the house in which she resides. Because she is a…
- 2174 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Both “The Necklace” and “The Gift of the Magi” have plots that depend in large measure on the use of situational irony to create a surprise ending. “The Necklace” tells the story of Madame Mathilde Loise, a lowly clerk’s wife, who, in an effort to appear more debonaire than she is, borrows expensive jewels from Madame Jeanne Forestier, a wealthy friend. After the inevitable loss of the jewels, Madame Loisel and her husband secretly replace the jewels. Years later, Madame Loise, now impoverished, encounters Madame Forestier on the streets of Paris and admits to the secret. Madame Forestier, shocked by the change in Loise, explains that the necklace was merely costume jewelry. The situational irony that both the reader and Madame Loise experience…
- 256 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
It was after the ball when she realized she had lost the necklace, panicked, she comes up to her husband and says, “"I . . . I . . . I've no longer got Madame Forestier's necklace. . . ." (6) The fact that she cannot keep up with other people’s belongings, tells you that she isn’t responsible enough to keep up with her own things. She further verifies that she can’t take responsibility when she continually lies to her friend about it. Mr. Loisel suggests her to “tell her that you've broken the clasp of her necklace and are getting it mended.” (7) So that they can have more time to look for it. Lastly, when she bumps into her friend on the street after ten years of being in debt she says, “Yes, I’ve had some hard times since I saw you last; and many sorrows…and all on your account.” (9) Nonetheless, it was Mathilda’s fault that she lost the necklace and that she couldn’t own up and tell the truth. She does not want to accept the fact that she is responsible for her own…
- 559 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Guy de Maupassant, born into nobility, wrote “The Necklace,” along with many other literary works, some inspired by his nobility. “The Necklace” is rittled with themes of wealth, and status, all issues Maupassant would have dealt with. The main character, Mathilde deals with these issues as well. When Mathilde deals with these themes her character is revealed, some good, but mostly bad. In “The Necklace” Maupassant represents Mathilde’s character by revealing her greediness, her lies, and her love.…
- 1059 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde is seen as a poor woman who had low self-esteem and was married to a clerk. In this story, she was invited to a ball and borrowed a friend’s necklace. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace was lost. As a result, she had to search for a similar necklace and had to take out loans to make a purchase. She was forced to work for ten years to pay off the debt until one day when she saw her friend. Little did Mathilde know that the necklace she lost was worth much less than the new necklace she paid for.…
- 622 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Part of one’s identity is their desires. In The Necklace, Matilda pursues praise from others. In order to fulfill that desire, Matilda gets expensive jewelry and clothes. The author expresses how Matilda’s desires did not keep her happy. She ended up selling all of her family’s savings to prevent guilt. That act shows how little care she has of others and how selfish she is for losing the necklace and running to her family again for help. Maupassant states “Matilda runs her fingers over a pearl necklace and a golden brooch, then hesitates. Is there anything else?” (Maupassant 2) She showed little appreciation after her friend was so kind to help her out.…
- 517 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The meaning of Moupassant’s “The Necklace” is that one should not fall into the trap of wishing for better things and not recognizing what one has to be thankful for. Moupassant uses the main character, Mme. Loisel, to illustrate this point as she struggles with her self-image and her desire to always be better in the eyes of others, especially the upper class and the rich.…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I am a strong believer in being grateful for everything you have been blessed with because no matter how you might see it, life could always be worse. In the short story, The Necklace, the writer uses character, symbolism, and tone to display the theme that we should play the cards we are handed rather then lusting for something that is unreal because we could lose everything almost instantly.…
- 714 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays